CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 79

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A review on recent advances of biochar from agricultural and forestry wastes: Preparation, modification and applications in wastewater treatment

Yu, Shixin, Zhang, Wen, Dong, Xiaowan, Wang, Fangshu, Yang, Wen, Liu, Changqing, Chen, Dong·2024·Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
DOI 10.1016/j.jece.2023.111638
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jece.2023.111638

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There exist several forms of AOPs, including ozone, ozone/hydrogen peroxide, ozone/UV, UV/TiO2, UV/hydrogen peroxide, Fenton reactions, Photo-Fenton reactions, ultrasonic irradiation, heat/persulfate, UV/persulfate, Fe(II)/persulfate, and OH-/persulfate.

    “There exist several forms of AOPs, including ozone, ozone/hydrogen peroxide, ozone/UV, UV/TiO 2 , UV/hydrogen peroxide, Fenton reactions, Photo-Fenton reactions, ultrasonic irradiation, heat/persulfate, UV/persulfate, Fe(II)/persulfate, and OH-/persulfate [252].”

    From Recent Advances in the Remediation of Textile-Dye-Containing Wastewater: Prioritizing Human Health and Sustainable Wastewater Treatment (2024) · cites this paper as [252]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 176

  1. DOTTO, 2020, Current scenario and challenges in adsorption for water treatment, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8, 10.1016/j.jece.2020.103988 · DOI
  2. SARAVANAN, 2022, A detailed review on advanced oxidation process in treatment of wastewater: mechanism, challenges and future outlook, Chemosphere, 308, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136524 · DOI
  3. ARREGUI, 2019, Laccases: structure, function, and potential application in water bioremediation, Microb. Cell Factor., 18, 10.1186/s12934-019-1248-0 · DOI
  4. AL-ANZI, 2017, Recent developments of carbon based nanomaterials and membranes for oily wastewater treatment, RSC Adv., 7, 20981, 10.1039/C7RA02501G · DOI
  5. KHAN, 2022, Recent advances in functional materials for wastewatertreatment: from materials to technological innovations, J. Mar. Sci. Eng., 10, 10.3390/jmse10040534 · DOI
  6. SARAVANAN, 2022, Insights on synthesis and applications of graphene-based materials in wastewater treatment: a review, Chemosphere, 298, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134284 · DOI
  7. SCARISOREANU, 2020, Ag, Au and Pt decorated TiO2 biocompatible nanospheres for UV & vis photocatalytic water treatment, Appl. Surf. Sci., 509, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.145217 · DOI
  8. AZAM, 2022, A review on activated carbon modifications for the treatment of wastewater containing anionic dyes, Chemosphere, 306, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135566 · DOI
  9. KUMAR, 2018, Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as futuristic options for wastewater treatment, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 62, 130, 10.1016/j.jiec.2017.12.051 · DOI
  10. LEE, 2016, Progress and challenges of carbon nanotube membrane in water treatment, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 999, 10.1080/10643389.2016.1191894 · DOI
  11. GUPTA, 2022, Agro-forestry waste management- a review, Chemosphere, 287, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132321 · DOI
  12. XIAO, 2017, Recent developments in biochar utilization as an additive in organic solid waste composting: a review, Bioresour. Technol., 246, 203, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.090 · DOI
  13. CRUZ, 2020, Agrowaste derived biochars impregnated with ZnO for removal of arsenic and lead in water, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8, 10.1016/j.jece.2020.103800 · DOI
  14. CHE, 2023, Super facile one-step synthesis of sugarcane bagasse derived N-doped porous biochar for adsorption of ciprofloxacin, J. Environ. Manag., 335, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117566 · DOI
  15. TOMUL, 2020, Peanut shells-derived biochars prepared from different carbonization processes: comparison of characterization and mechanism of naproxen adsorption in water, Sci. Total Environ., 726, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137828 · DOI
  16. SANG, 2022, Degradation of ciprofloxacin using heterogeneous Fenton catalysts derived from natural pyrite and rice straw biochar, J. Clean. Prod., 378, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134459 · DOI
  17. ZHUO, 2022, Highly efficient activation of persulfate by encapsulated nano-Fe0 biochar for acetaminophen degradation: rich electron environment and dominant effect of superoxide radical, Chem. Eng. J., 440, 10.1016/j.cej.2022.135947 · DOI
  18. AN, 2022, Application of biochar activated persulfate in the treatment of typical azo pigment wastewater, J. Environ. Manag., 324, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116323 · DOI
  19. LI, 2022, Efficient removal of tetracycline by H2O2 activated with iron-doped biochar: performance, mechanism, and degradation pathways, Chin. Chem. Lett., 33, 2105, 10.1016/j.cclet.2021.08.054 · DOI
  20. IMAM, 2021, Application of laccase immobilized rice straw biochar for anthracene degradation, Environ. Pollut., 268
  21. GHAFFAR, 2018, Biochar composite membrane for high performance pollutant management: Fabrication, structural characteristics and synergistic mechanisms, Environ. Pollut., 233, 1013, 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.09.099 · DOI
  22. CHENG, 2021, Improving sulfonamide antibiotics removal from swine wastewater by supplying a new pomelo peel derived biochar in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor, Bioresour. Technol., 319, 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124160 · DOI
  23. JAFRI, 2018, A review on production and characterization of biochars for application in direct carbon fuel cells, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 118, 152, 10.1016/j.psep.2018.06.036 · DOI
  24. SHRIVASTAVA, 2021, Comparative investigation of yield and quality of bio-oil and biochar from pyrolysis of woody and non-woody biomasses, Energies, 14, 10.3390/en14041092 · DOI
  25. ESPíNDOLA, 2021, Nanocellulose recovery from domestic wastewater, J. Clean. Prod., 280, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124507 · DOI
  26. LU, 2016, Characteristic of heavy metals in biochar derived from sewage sludge, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 18, 725, 10.1007/s10163-015-0366-y · DOI
  27. PHOUNGTHONG, 2018, Leaching characteristics and phytotoxic effects of sewage sludge biochar, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 20, 2089, 10.1007/s10163-018-0763-0 · DOI
  28. WANG, 2020, New trends in biochar pyrolysis and modification strategies: feedstock, pyrolysis conditions, sustainability concerns and implications for soil amendment, Soil Use Manag., 36, 358, 10.1111/sum.12592 · DOI · Paper page
  29. MO, 2018, A review on agro-industrial waste (AIW) derived adsorbents for water and wastewater treatment, J. Environ. Manag., 227, 395, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.069 · DOI
  30. ANASTOPOULOS, 2017, A review on waste-derived adsorbents from sugar industry for pollutant removal in water and wastewater, J. Mol. Liq., 240, 179, 10.1016/j.molliq.2017.05.063 · DOI
  31. SAXENA, 2017, Adsorption of heavy metals from wastewater using agricultural–industrial wastes as biosorbents, Water Sci., 31, 189, 10.1016/j.wsj.2017.09.002 · DOI
  32. SINGH, 2017, Adsorption of heavy metals from waste waters using waste biomass, Int J. Eng. Res Technol., 1, 423
  33. YAN, 2014, Dynamic modeling of biogas upgrading in hollow fiber membrane contactors, Energy fuels, 28, 5745, 10.1021/ef501435q · DOI
  34. KUMAR, 2020, Hydochar and biochar: production, physicochemical properties and techno-economic analysis], Bioresour. Technol., 310, 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123442 · DOI
  35. ZAMA, 2017, The role of biochar properties in influencing the sorption and desorption of Pb (II), Cd (II) and As (III) in aqueous solution, J. Clean. Prod., 148, 127, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.125 · DOI
  36. MUKOME, 2013, Use of chemical and physical characteristics to investigate trends in biochar feedstocks, J. Agric. Food Chem., 61, 2196, 10.1021/jf3049142 · DOI · Paper page
  37. YARGICOGLU, 2015, Physical and chemical characterization of waste wood derived biochars, Waste Manag., 36, 256, 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.10.029 · DOI · Paper page
  38. VERHEIJEN, 2010, Biochar application to soils, A Crit. Sci. Rev. Eff. Soil Prop. Process. Funct. EUR, 24099, 2183
  39. KLOSS, 2012, Characterization of slow pyrolysis biochars: effects of feedstocks and pyrolysis temperature on biochar properties, J. Environ. Qual., 41, 990, 10.2134/jeq2011.0070 · DOI · Paper page
  40. LEE, 2013, Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500C, Bioresour. Technol., 148, 196, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.135 · DOI · Paper page
  41. LEE, 2013, Production and characterization of biochar from various biomass materials by slow pyrolysis, Tech. Bull. Food Fertil. Technol. Cent.
  42. MUKHERJEE, 2011, Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars, Geoderma, 163, 247, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.021 · DOI · Paper page
  43. ZHANG, 2015, Effects of pyrolysis temperature and heating time on biochar obtained from the pyrolysis of straw and lignosulfonate, Bioresour. Technol., 176, 288, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.011 · DOI · Paper page
  44. SHEN, 2019, Effect of production temperature on lead removal mechanisms by rice straw biochars, Sci. Total Environ., 655, 751, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.282 · DOI
  45. HU, 2023, Adsorption of phosphorus in water by metal-modified large-size biochar: realizing the recovery and recycling of phosphorus, Sustain. Chem. Pharm., 36
  46. ALI, 2022, Characteristics of biochars derived from the pyrolysis and co-pyrolysis of rubberwood sawdust and sewage sludge for further applications, Sustainability, 14, 10.3390/su14073829 · DOI
  47. H EL-GAMAL, 2017, Comparison between properties of biochar produced by traditional and controlled pyrolysis, Alex. Sci. Exch. J., 38, 412
  48. YUAN, 2011, The forms of alkalis in the biochar produced from crop residues at different temperatures, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 3488, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.018 · DOI · Paper page
  49. DING, 2014, Pyrolytic temperatures impact lead sorption mechanisms by bagasse biochars, Chemosphere, 105, 68, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.042 · DOI · Paper page
  50. AL-WABEL, 2013, Pyrolysis temperature induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from conocarpus wastes, Bioresour. Technol., 131, 374, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.165 · DOI · Paper page
  51. VAMVUKA, 2011, Effects of heating rate and water leaching of perennial energy crops on pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics, Renew. Energy, 36, 2433, 10.1016/j.renene.2011.02.013 · DOI
  52. AZARGOHAR, 2011, The direct oxidation of hydrogen sulphide over activated carbons prepared from lignite coal and biochar, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 89, 844, 10.1002/cjce.20430 · DOI
  53. GHANI, 2013, Biochar production from waste rubber-wood-sawdust and its potential use in C sequestration: chemical and physical characterization, Ind. Crops Prod., 44, 18, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.017 · DOI · Paper page
  54. GOMEZ-EYLES, 2013, The potential of biochar amendments to remediate contaminated soils, Biochar Soil biota, 4, 100
  55. KASOZI, 2010, Catechol and humic acid sorption onto a range of laboratory-produced black carbons (biochars), Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 6189, 10.1021/es1014423 · DOI · Paper page
  56. BANIK, 2018, Impact of pyrolysis temperature and feedstock on surface charge and functional group chemistry of biochars, J. Environ. Qual., 47, 452, 10.2134/jeq2017.11.0432 · DOI
  57. SONG, 2012, Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 94, 138, 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.018 · DOI · Paper page
  58. TOMCZYK, 2020, Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects, Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol., 19, 191, 10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3 · DOI · Paper page
  59. QIAN, 2015, Recent advances in utilization of biochar, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 42, 1055, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.074 · DOI
  60. BREWER, 2011, Criteria to select biochars for field studies based on biochar chemical properties, Bioenergy Res., 4, 312, 10.1007/s12155-011-9133-7 · DOI
  61. YOU, 2017, A critical review on sustainable biochar system through gasification: energy and environmental applications, Bioresour. Technol., 246, 242, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.177 · DOI
  62. BREWER, 2009, Characterization of biochar from fast pyrolysis and gasification systems, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy. Off. Publ. Am. Inst. Chem. Eng., 28, 386, 10.1002/ep.10378 · DOI
  63. CZERWIŃSKA, 2022, Hydrothermal carbonization process: fundamentals, main parameter characteristics and possible applications including an effective method of SARS-CoV-2 mitigation in sewage sludge. A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 154, 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111873 · DOI
  64. LI, 2016, Biochar from microwave pyrolysis of biomass: a review, Biomass Bioenergy, 94, 228, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.010 · DOI
  65. DURáN-JIMéNEZ, 2018, Microwave pyrolysis of pecan nut shell and thermogravimetric, textural and spectroscopic characterization of carbonaceous products, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 135, 160, 10.1016/j.jaap.2018.09.007 · DOI
  66. ETHAIB, 2020, Microwave-assisted pyrolysis of biomass waste: a mini review, Processes, 8, 1190, 10.3390/pr8091190 · DOI
  67. PALLARéS, 2018, Production and characterization of activated carbon from barley straw by physical activation with carbon dioxide and steam, Biomass Bioenergy, 115, 64, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.04.015 · DOI
  68. ANTAL, 2003, Flash carbonization of biomass, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 42, 3690, 10.1021/ie0301839 · DOI
  69. WEI-HSIN, 2015, A state of the art review of biomass torrefaction, densification and application, Renew. Sustain Energy Rev., 44, 847, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.039 · DOI
  70. PAN, 2021, Preparation of biochar and biochar composites and their application in a Fenton-like process for wastewater decontamination: a review, Sci. Total Environ., 754, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142104 · DOI
  71. ZHAO, 2018, Effect of pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, and residence time on rapeseed stem derived biochar, J. Clean. Prod., 174, 977, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.013 · DOI · Paper page
  72. INGUANZO, 2002, On the pyrolysis of sewage sludge: the influence of pyrolysis conditions on solid, liquid and gas fractions, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 63, 209, 10.1016/S0165-2370(01)00155-3 · DOI
  73. GUIZANI, 2017, Biomass fast pyrolysis in a drop tube reactor for bio oil production: experiments and modeling, Fuel, 207, 71, 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.06.068 · DOI
  74. INGUANZO, 2001, Reactivity of pyrolyzed sewage sludge in air and CO2, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 58, 943, 10.1016/S0165-2370(00)00143-1 · DOI
  75. SINGH, 2010, Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment, Soil Res., 48, 516, 10.1071/SR10058 · DOI · Paper page
  76. ZORNOZA, 2016, Stability, nutrient availability and hydrophobicity of biochars derived from manure, crop residues, and municipal solid waste for their use as soil amendments, Chemosphere, 144, 122, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.08.046 · DOI
  77. LU, 1995, Surface area development of sewage sludge during pyrolysis, Fuel, 74, 344, 10.1016/0016-2361(95)93465-P · DOI
  78. XIANG, 2020, Biochar technology in wastewater treatment: a critical review, Chemosphere, 252, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126539 · DOI · Paper page
  79. WANG, 2018, Recent advances in engineered biochar productions and applications, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 2158, 10.1080/10643389.2017.1418580 · DOI
  80. TAN, 2016, Biochar-based nano-composites for the decontamination of wastewater: a review, Bioresour. Technol., 212, 318, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.093 · DOI
  81. LIU, 2019, From rice straw to magnetically recoverable nitrogen doped biochar: efficient activation of peroxymonosulfate for the degradation of metolachlor, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 254, 312, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.05.014 · DOI
  82. GAN, 2015, Effect of porous zinc–biochar nanocomposites on Cr (VI) adsorption from aqueous solution, Rsc Adv., 5, 35107, 10.1039/C5RA04416B · DOI · Paper page
  83. TANG, 2015, Preparation and characterization of a novel graphene/biochar composite for aqueous phenanthrene and mercury removal, Bioresour. Technol., 196, 355, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.047 · DOI
  84. INYANG, 2014, Synthesis, characterization, and dye sorption ability of carbon nanotube–biochar nanocomposites, Chem. Eng. J., 236, 39, 10.1016/j.cej.2013.09.074 · DOI
  85. INYANG, 2015, Sorption and cosorption of lead and sulfapyridine on carbon nanotube-modified biochars, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 22, 1868, 10.1007/s11356-014-2740-z · DOI
  86. YAO, 2011, Biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugar beet tailings: characterization and phosphate removal potential, Bioresour. Technol., 102, 6273, 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.006 · DOI · Paper page
  87. TANG, 2019, Influence of pyrolysis temperature on production of digested sludge biochar and its application for ammonium removal from municipal wastewater, J. Clean. Prod., 209, 927, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.268 · DOI
  88. WANG, 2017, Biochar provides a safe and value-added solution for hyperaccumulating plant disposal: a case study of Phytolacca acinosa Roxb.(Phytolaccaceae), Chemosphere, 178, 59, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.02.121 · DOI
  89. YAO, 2013, Engineered carbon (biochar) prepared by direct pyrolysis of Mg-accumulated tomato tissues: characterization and phosphate removal potential, Bioresour. Technol., 138, 8, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.057 · DOI
  90. RAJAPAKSHA, 2015, Enhanced sulfamethazine removal by steam-activated invasive plant-derived biochar, J. Hazard. Mater., 290, 43, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.046 · DOI · Paper page
  91. LIMA, 2005, Adsorption of selected environmentally important metals by poultry manure‐based granular activated carbons, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. Int. Res. Process Environ. Clean. Technol., 80, 1054
  92. LYU, 2017, Ball-milled carbon nanomaterials for energy and environmental applications, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 5, 9568, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02170 · DOI
  93. PETERSON, 2012, Increasing biochar surface area: optimization of ball milling parameters, Powder Technol., 228, 115, 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.05.005 · DOI
  94. LYU, 2018, Effects of ball milling on the physicochemical and sorptive properties of biochar: experimental observations and governing mechanisms, Environ. Pollut., 233, 54, 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.037 · DOI
  95. LYU, 2018, Experimental and modeling investigations of ball-milled biochar for the removal of aqueous methylene blue, Chem. Eng. J., 335, 110, 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.130 · DOI
  96. LI, 2016, Effect of nitric acid modification on the lead(II) adsorption of mesoporous biochars with different mesopore size distributions, Clean. Technol. Environ. Policy, 18, 797, 10.1007/s10098-015-1056-0 · DOI
  97. VITHANAGE, 2015, Acid-activated biochar increased sulfamethazine retention in soils, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 22, 2175, 10.1007/s11356-014-3434-2 · DOI
  98. DING, 2016, Removal of lead, copper, cadmium, zinc, and nickel from aqueous solutions by alkali-modified biochar: batch and column tests, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 33, 239, 10.1016/j.jiec.2015.10.007 · DOI
  99. HAN, 2015, Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution using porous biochar obtained by KOH activation of peanut shell biochar, BioResources, 10, 2836, 10.15376/biores.10.2.2836-2849 · DOI
  100. AN, 2019, Unraveling sorption of nickel from aqueous solution by KMnO4 and KOH-modified peanut shell biochar: implicit mechanism, Chemosphere, 214, 846, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.10.007 · DOI
  101. WANG, 2018, H2O2 treatment enhanced the heavy metals removal by manure biochar in aqueous solutions, Sci. Total Environ., 628–629, 1139, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.137 · DOI
  102. YI, 2020, Magnetic biochar for environmental remediation: a review, Bioresour. Technol., 298, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122468 · DOI
  103. HUANG, 2021, Magnetic biochars have lower adsorption but higher separation effectiveness for Cd2+ from aqueous solution compared to nonmagnetic biochars, Environ. Pollut., 275, 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116485 · DOI
  104. GONG, 2016, Nitrogen-doped porous carbon nanosheets derived from poly(ionic liquid)s: hierarchical pore structures for efficient CO2 capture and dye removal, J. Mater. Chem. A, 4, 7313, 10.1039/C6TA01945E · DOI
  105. HE, 2021, Efficient degradation of diclofenac sodium by periodate activation using Fe/Cu bimetallic modified sewage sludge biochar/UV system, Sci. Total Environ., 783, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146974 · DOI
  106. XU, 2022, Adsorption of micropollutants from wastewater using iron and nitrogen co-doped biochar: performance, kinetics and mechanism studies, J. Hazard. Mater., 424, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127606 · DOI
  107. PENG, 2022, Efficient adsorption-photocatalytic removal of tetracycline hydrochloride over La2S3-modified biochar with S,N-codoping, J. Water Process Eng., 49, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.103038 · DOI
  108. ZUBAIR, 2021, Sustainable wastewater treatment by biochar/layered double hydroxide composites: progress, challenges, and outlook, Bioresour. Technol., 319, 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124128 · DOI
  109. TAN, 2016, Biochar-based nano-composites for the decontamination of wastewater: a review, Bioresour. Technol., 212, 318, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.093 · DOI
  110. GUPTA, 2022, A critical review on biochar-based catalysts for the abatement of toxic pollutants from water via advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), Sci. Total Environ., 849, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157831 · DOI
  111. HAN, 2016, Adsorption kinetics of magnetic biochar derived from peanut hull on removal of Cr (VI) from aqueous solution: Effects of production conditions and particle size, Chemosphere, 145, 336, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.050 · DOI
  112. CRUZ, 2020, Agrowaste derived biochars impregnated with ZnO for removal of arsenic and lead in water, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8, 10.1016/j.jece.2020.103800 · DOI
  113. WANG, 2019, Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: a review, J. Clean. Prod., 227, 1002, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.282 · DOI · Paper page
  114. DIVBAND HAFSHEJANI, 2016, Removal of nitrate from aqueous solution by modified sugarcane bagasse biochar, Ecol. Eng., 95, 101, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.035 · DOI
  115. ZHANG, 2012, Synthesis of porous MgO-biochar nanocomposites for removal of phosphate and nitrate from aqueous solutions, Chem. Eng. J., 210, 26, 10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.052 · DOI · Paper page
  116. VYAVAHARE, 2021, Sorption of brilliant green dye using soybean straw-derived biochar: characterization, kinetics, thermodynamics and toxicity studies, Environ. Geochem Health, 43, 2913, 10.1007/s10653-020-00804-y · DOI
  117. WANG, 2023, Diatom biochar recovered Au(III) efficiently from both synthetic and real electroplating wastewaters, ACS EST Water, 3, 1395, 10.1021/acsestwater.3c00066 · DOI
  118. LI, 2023, A novel role of various hydrogen bonds in adsorption, desorption and co-adsorption of PPCPs on corn straw-derived biochars, Sci. Total Environ., 861, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160623 · DOI
  119. WU, 2022, Hydroxyapatite tailored hierarchical porous biochar composite immobilized Cd(II) and Pb(II) and mitigated their hazardous effects in contaminated water and soil, J. Hazard Mater., 437, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129330 · DOI
  120. BHAVANI, 2022, Recent advancements on the sustainable biochar based semiconducting materials for photocatalytic applications: a state of the art review, J. Clean. Prod., 330, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129899 · DOI
  121. SUN, 2021, Biochar cathode: reinforcing electro-Fenton pathway against four-electron reduction by controlled carbonization and surface chemistry, Sci. Total Environ., 754, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142136 · DOI
  122. DENG, 2020, Biochar-mediated Fenton-like reaction for the degradation of sulfamethazine: role of environmentally persistent free radicals, Chemosphere, 255, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126975 · DOI
  123. YI, 2021, Magnetic biochar derived from Eichhornia crassipes for highly efficient Fenton-like degradation of antibiotics: mechanism and contributions, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9, 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106258 · DOI
  124. ZHOU, 2021, New notion of biochar: a review on the mechanism of biochar applications in advannced oxidation processes, Chem. Eng. J., 416, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129027 · DOI
  125. DENG, 2018, Nanoscale zero-valent iron/biochar composite as an activator for Fenton-like removal of sulfamethazine, Sep. Purif. Technol., 202, 130, 10.1016/j.seppur.2018.03.048 · DOI
  126. RUBEENA, 2018, Iron impregnated biochars as heterogeneous Fenton catalyst for the degradation of acid red 1 dye, J. Environ. Manag., 226, 320, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.055 · DOI
  127. PARK, 2018, Degradation of Orange G by Fenton-like reaction with Fe-impregnated biochar catalyst, Bioresour. Technol., 249, 368, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.030 · DOI
  128. HUANG, 2016, Influence of morphological and chemical features of biochar on hydrogen peroxide activation: implications on sulfamethazine degradation, RSC Adv., 6, 73186, 10.1039/C6RA11850J · DOI
  129. DEVI, 2020, Activity and stability of biochar in hydrogen peroxide based oxidation system for degradation of naphthenic acid, Chemosphere, 241, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125007 · DOI
  130. SHAN, 2020, A review of recent developments in catalytic applications of biochar-based materials, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 162, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105036 · DOI
  131. KUMAR, 2023, Waste to catalyst: role of agricultural waste in water and wastewater treatment, Sci. Total Environ., 858
  132. LI, 2020, Biochar-activated persulfate for organic contaminants removal: efficiency, mechanisms and influencing factors, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 198, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110653 · DOI
  133. HUANG, 2021, Efficient activation of persulfate by a magnetic recyclable rape straw biochar catalyst for the degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride in water, Sci. Total Environ., 758, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143957 · DOI
  134. LI, 2021, Clinoptilolite mediated activation of peroxymonosulfate through spherical dispersion and oriented array of NiFe2O4: Upgrading synergy and performance, J. Hazard. Mater., 407, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.124736 · DOI
  135. YAO, 2022, Magnetic MgFe(2)O(4)/biochar derived from pomelo peel as a persulfate activator for levofloxacin degradation: effects and mechanistic consideration, Bioresour. Technol., 346, 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.126547 · DOI
  136. LI, 2020, High-efficiency degradation of organic pollutants with Fe, N co-doped biochar catalysts via persulfate activation, J. Hazard Mater., 397, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122764 · DOI
  137. CAI, 2020, FeCu-biochar enhances the removal of antibacterial sulfapyridine from groundwater by activation of persulfate, Environ. Chem. Lett., 18, 1693, 10.1007/s10311-020-01026-5 · DOI
  138. HU, 2021, Singlet oxygen-dominated activation of peroxymonosulfate by passion fruit shell derived biochar for catalytic degradation of tetracycline through a non-radical oxidation pathway, J. Hazard Mater., 419, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126495 · DOI
  139. YANG, 2021, Catalyst bridging-mediated electron transfer for nonradical degradation of bisphenol A via natural manganese ore-cornstalk biochar composite activated peroxymonosulfate, Chem. Eng. J., 426, 10.1016/j.cej.2021.131777 · DOI
  140. YAO, 2020, Synergistic adsorption and electrocatalytic reduction of bromate by Pd/N-doped loofah sponge-derived biochar electrode, J. Hazard Mater., 386, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121651 · DOI
  141. ZHANG, 2022, A novel biochar electrode for efficient electroreduction of nitrate: selective and regulation of halogen, Chemosphere, 288
  142. LIU, 2021, Role of the biochar modified with ZnCl2 and FeCl3 on the electrochemical degradation of nitrobenzene, Chemosphere, 275, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129966 · DOI
  143. DU, 2021, Nanostructured electrodes for electrocatalytic advanced oxidation processes: from materials preparation to mechanisms understanding and wastewater treatment applications, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 296, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120332 · DOI
  144. ZHANG, 2022, Radical and non-radical cooperative degradation in metal-free electro-Fenton based on nitrogen self-doped biochar, J. Hazard Mater., 435, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129063 · DOI
  145. DENG, 2019, A biochar modified nickel-foam cathode with iron-foam catalyst in electro-Fenton for sulfamerazine degradation, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 256, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117796 · DOI
  146. LUO, 2022, High H2O2 selectivity and enhanced Fe2+ regeneration toward an effective electro-Fenton process based on a self-doped porous biochar cathode, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 315, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121523 · DOI
  147. DENG, 2019, Waste-wood-derived biochar cathode and its application in electro-Fenton for sulfathiazole treatment at alkaline pH with pyrophosphate electrolyte, J. Hazard Mater., 377, 249, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.05.077 · DOI
  148. CHEN, 2022, Recent advances in waste-derived functional materials for wastewater remediation, Eco-Environ. Health, 1, 86, 10.1016/j.eehl.2022.05.001 · DOI
  149. TOLOSANA-MORANCHEL, 2019, Nature and photoreactivity of TiO2-rGO nanocomposites in aqueous suspensions under UV-A irradiation, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 241, 375, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.070 · DOI
  150. ZHANG, 2019, Self-template synthesis of double-shell TiO2@ZIF-8 hollow nanospheres via sonocrystallization with enhanced photocatalytic activities in hydrogen generation, Appl. Catal. B Environ., 241, 149, 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.09.036 · DOI
  151. ZHANG, 2018, Treatment of wastewater containing reactive brilliant blue KN-R using TiO2/BC composite as heterogeneous photocatalyst and adsorbent, Chemosphere, 206, 777, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.073 · DOI
  152. HOU, 2022, The role of biochar in the photocatalytic treatment of a mixture of Cr(VI) and phenol pollutants: biochar as a carrier for transferring and storing electrons, Sci. Total Environ., 844, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157145 · DOI
  153. KAUR, 2019, Solar light active silver/iron oxide/zinc oxide heterostructure for photodegradation of ciprofloxacin, transformation products and antibacterial activity, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 557, 236, 10.1016/j.jcis.2019.09.017 · DOI
  154. YU, 2021, ZnO/biochar nanocomposites via solvent free ball milling for enhanced adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue, J. Hazard Mater., 415, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125511 · DOI
  155. AMIR, 2022, Integrated adsorptive and photocatalytic degradation of pharmaceutical micropollutant, ciprofloxacin employing biochar-ZnO composite photocatalysts, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 115, 171, 10.1016/j.jiec.2022.07.050 · DOI
  156. ANUPAMA, 2021, A comprehensive evaluation of inherent properties and applications of nano-biochar prepared from different methods and feedstocks, J. Clean. Prod., 320, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128759 · DOI
  157. MAO, 2021, Facile assembled N, S-codoped corn straw biochar loaded Bi(2)WO(6) with the enhanced electron-rich feature for the efficient photocatalytic removal of ciprofloxacin and Cr(VI), Chemosphere, 263, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127988 · DOI
  158. GENG, 2020, Using wood flour waste to produce biochar as the support to enhance the visible-light photocatalytic performance of BiOBr for organic and inorganic contaminants removal, Chemosphere, 250, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126291 · DOI
  159. PI, 2015, g-C3N4 Modified biochar as an adsorptive and photocatalytic material for decontamination of aqueous organic pollutants, Appl. Surf. Sci., 358, 231, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.08.176 · DOI
  160. KANG, 2022, Honeycomb like CdS/sulphur-modified biochar composites with enhanced adsorption-photocatalytic capacity for effective removal of rhodamine B, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 10, 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106942 · DOI
  161. GENG, 2018, Highly efficient visible-light photocatalyst based on cellulose derived carbon nanofiber/BiOBr composites, Cellulose, 25, 4133, 10.1007/s10570-018-1851-y · DOI
  162. WANG, 2022, A new biocomposite based on microbial autocrine laccase-rice straw: preparation, characterization and application, Ind. Crops Prod., 189, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115746 · DOI
  163. MORSI, 2020, Laccases and peroxidases: the smart, greener and futuristic biocatalytic tools to mitigate recalcitrant emerging pollutants, Sci. Total Environ., 714, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136572 · DOI
  164. SHOKRI, 2021, Laccase immobilization onto natural polysaccharides for biosensing and biodegradation, Carbohydr. Polym., 262, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117963 · DOI
  165. GARCíA-DELGADO, 2015, Combination of biochar amendment and mycoremediation for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons immobilization and biodegradation in creosote-contaminated soil, J. Hazard. Mater., 285, 259, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.12.002 · DOI
  166. GOPIRAMAN M., MUNEESWARAN M., KIM I.S. Highly Porous Ru/C and Cu/C Nanocatalysts Derived from Custard Apple for Rapid and Selective Reduction of p-Nitrophenol [J]. 2019. · DOI
  167. JIANG, 2022, Halohydrin dehalogenase immobilization in magnetic biochar for sustainable halocarbon biodegradation and biotransformation, Environ. Technol. Innov., 27
  168. ZHANG, 2020, Immobilization of laccase on magnetically separable biochar for highly efficient removal of bisphenol A in water, RSC Adv., 10, 4795, 10.1039/C9RA08800H · DOI
  169. WANG, 2021, Study on adsorption-degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol by modified biochar immobilized laccase, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 19, 1393, 10.1007/s13762-021-03151-2 · DOI
  170. SUN, 2022, Role of spent coffee ground biochar in an anaerobic membrane bioreactor for treating synthetic swine wastewater, J. Water Process Eng., 49, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2022.102981 · DOI
  171. SIMA, 2017, Robust biochar-assisted alleviation of membrane fouling in MBRs by indirect mechanism, Sep. Purif. Technol., 184, 195, 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.04.046 · DOI
  172. ZHANG, 2022, Advancing strategies of biofouling control in water-treated polymeric membranes, Polymers, 14, 10.3390/polym14061167 · DOI
  173. HE, 2018, Treatment of methylene blue containing wastewater by a cost-effective micro-scale biochar/polysulfone mixed matrix hollow fiber membrane: performance and mechanism studies, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 512, 190, 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.09.106 · DOI
  174. XIANG, 2021, Potential hazards of biochar: the negative environmental impacts of biochar applications, J. Hazard Mater., 420, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126611 · DOI · Paper page
  175. HARINDINTWALI, 2023, Effects of ball milling on biochar adsorption of contaminants in water: a meta-analysis, Sci. Total Environ., 882, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163643 · DOI
  176. RAMANAYAKA, 2020, Nanobiochar: production, properties, and multifunctional applications, Environ. Sci.: Nano, 7, 3279

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yu, S., Zhang, W., Dong, X., Wang, F., Yang, W., Liu, C., & Chen, D.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-02
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
111638
ISSN
2213-3437
DOI
10.1016/j.jece.2023.111638
Cited by
79
References
28
Language
en
Licence
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd (310074/G10)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review