Cited by 693Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsComposting and Vermicomposting Techniques

Quality variations of poultry litter biochar generated at different pyrolysis temperatures

Song, Weiping, Guo, Mingxin·2012·Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jaap.2011.11.018

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, W., & Guo, M.
Affiliations
Delaware State University (US)
Corresponding author
Guo, Mingxin
Venue
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
94
Pages
138-145
ISSN
0165-2370 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000100608
Cited by
693
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 36 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 81 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Keywords
poultry litter, biochar, pyrolysis temperature, slow pyrolysis, biochar quality, organic carbon, nitrogen loss, cation exchange capacity, BET surface area, ash content, carbon sequestration, agricultural waste recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review