Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

I like it, because I like myself: Associative self-anchoring and post-decisional change of implicit evaluations

Gawronski, Bertram, Bodenhausen, Galen V., Becker, Andrew P.·2007·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.001

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Ashburn-Nardo, 2001, Implicit associations as seeds of intergroup bias: how easily do they take root?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 789, 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.789 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.789
  2. Baron, 1986, The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Beggan, 1992, On the social nature of nonsocial perception: the mere ownership effect, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 229, 10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.229 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.229 · Paper page
  4. Bosson, 2000, Stalking the perfect measure of implicit self-esteem: the blind men and the elephant revisited?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 631, 10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.4.631 · Paper page
  5. Brehm, 1956, Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52, 384, 10.1037/h0041006 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cadinu, 1996, Self-anchoring and differentiation processes in the minimal group setting, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 661, 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.661 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Deutsch, R., Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (in press). At the boundaries of automaticity: negation as reflective operation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  8. Fazio, 1990, A practical guide to the use of response latency in social psychological research, Vol. 11, 74
  9. Frey, 1986, Recent research on selective exposure to information, Vol. 19, 41
  10. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (in press). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin.
  11. Gawronski, 2004, On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 535, 10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gawronski, B., Strack, F., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (in press). Attitudes and cognitive consistency: The role of associative and propositional processes. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  13. Gilbert, 1991, How mental systems believe, American Psychologist, 46, 107, 10.1037/0003-066X.46.2.107 · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.46.2.107 · Paper page
  14. Greenwald, 2002, A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept, Psychological Review, 109, 3, 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Harmon-Jones, 2002, Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: the effect of action orientation on postdecisional attitudes, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 711, 10.1177/0146167202289001 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kitayama, 1997, Implicit self-esteem in Japan: name letters and birthday numbers, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 736, 10.1177/0146167297237006 · DOI · Paper page
  17. LeBel, E. P., & Gawronski, B. (2006, January). Reasons versus feelings: Introspection and the relation between explicit and implicit attitudes. Poster presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Palm Springs, CA. · doi:10.1037/e633962013-308
  18. Millar, 1986, Effects of affective versus cognitive focus on the attitude-behavior relationship, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 270, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.270 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.2.270 · Paper page
  19. Nosek, 2002, Math=male, me=female, therefore math≠me, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 44, 10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Nuttin, 1985, Narcissism beyond Gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect, European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 353, 10.1002/ejsp.2420150309 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Otten, 2003, “Me and us” or “us and them”? The self as a heuristic for defining minimal ingroups, European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 1, 10.1080/10463280240000028 · DOI
  22. Otten, 1999, About the impact of automaticity in the Minimal Group Paradigm: evidence from affective priming tasks, European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 1049, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8<1049::AID-EJSP985>3.0.CO;2-Q · DOI
  23. Rubin, 1998, Social identity theory’s self-esteem hypothesis: a review and some suggestions for clarification, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 40, 10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_3 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Rudman, 2001, Implicit self-concept and evaluative implicit gender stereotypes: self and ingroup share desirable traits, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1164, 10.1177/0146167201279009 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Tajfel, 1971, Social categorization and intergroup behaviour, European Journal of Social Psychology, 1, 149, 10.1002/ejsp.2420010202 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Walther, 2003, I like her, because I like myself: self-evaluation as a source of interpersonal attitudes, Experimental Psychology, 50, 239, 10.1026//1618-3169.50.4.239 · DOI
  27. Wilson, 1986, Effects of introspection on attitude-behavior consistency: analyzing reasons versus focusing on feelings, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 249
  28. Wilson, 1989, Introspection, attitude change, and attitude-behavior consistency: the disruptive effects of explaining why we feel the way we do, Vol. 22, 287
  29. Wittenbrink, B. (in press). Measuring attitudes through priming. In B. Wittebrink, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies. New York: Guilford Press.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Becker, A. P.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
221-232
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.001
OpenAlex
W2032527315
Cited by
262
References
13
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.