Cited by 121Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchEnvironmental Chemistry and AnalysisPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Side-chain fluorinated polymer surfactants in biosolids from wastewater treatment plants

Letcher, Robert J., Chu, Shaogang, Smyth, Shirley-Anne·2020·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Abstract

High concentrations of the main components in Scotchgard™ fabric protector products (pre-2002 and post-2002; side-chain fluorinated polymer surfactants, S1 and S2, respectively) were detected in biosolids samples from twenty pan-Canadian wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). Based on mass spectrometric analysis, S1 and S2 can be named as side-chain perfluorooctane sulfonamide-urethane polymer and side-chain perfluorobutane sulfonamide-urethane polymer, respectively. S1 (with C 8 F 17 side-chain) concentrations ranged from 1.08-105 ng/g d.w. and S2 (with C 4 F 9 side-chain) concentrations ranged from 37.5-2051 ng/g d.w., which were much higher than that of other commonly monitored perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). S1 and S2 concentrations were significantly correlated (p < 0.001; r 2 = 0.6142) indicating similar source origins. A negative linear correlation was observed (p < 0.05) between concentrations of S1 (or S2) with the volume of WWTP treated wastewater per day per person (m 3/person/day). The total concentration of 22 other PFAS ranged from 4.93 to 92.6 ng/g d.w., and approximately thirty times lower than S1 and S2 concentrations. The calculated elemental fluorine concentrations of ƩF S1&S2 were generally much higher than the sum of the other PFAS. PFAS concentrations in biosolids are likely underestimated without consideration of S1 and S2.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122044

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Letcher, R. J., Chu, S., & Smyth, S.-A.
Affiliations
Environment and Climate Change Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Letcher, Robert J.
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
388
Pages
122044
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999485676
Cited by
121
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ecotoxicology and Wildlife Health Division (Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • ECCC’s Chemicals Management Plan
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
biosolids, wastewater treatment plants, perfluorinated compounds, PFAS contamination, elemental fluorine, source apportionment
MeSH terms
Biosolids, Canada, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbon Polymers, Surface-Active Agents, Waste Disposal, Fluid, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Water Purification, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review