Cited by 60Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Functional connectivity change as shared signal dynamics

Open access
Cole, Michael W., Yang, Genevieve J., Murray, John D., Repovš, Grega, Anticevic, Alan·2016·Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Abstract

Background An increasing number of neuroscientific studies gain insights by focusing on differences in functional connectivity-between groups, individuals, temporal windows, or task conditions. We found using simulations that additional insights into such differences can be gained by forgoing variance normalization, a procedure used by most functional connectivity measures. Simulations indicated that these functional connectivity measures are sensitive to increases in independent fluctuations (unshared signal) in time series, consistently reducing functional connectivity estimates (e.g., correlations) even though such changes are unrelated to corresponding fluctuations (shared signal) between those time series. This is inconsistent with the common notion of functional connectivity as the amount of inter-region interaction.New method Simulations revealed that a version of correlation without variance normalization - covariance - was able to isolate differences in shared signal, increasing interpretability of observed functional connectivity change. Simulations also revealed cases problematic for non-normalized methods, leading to a "covariance conjunction" method combining the benefits of both normalized and non-normalized approaches.Results We found that covariance and covariance conjunction methods can detect functional connectivity changes across a variety of tasks and rest in both clinical and non-clinical functional MRI datasets.Comparison with existing method(s) We verified using a variety of tasks and rest in both clinical and non-clinical functional MRI datasets that it matters in practice whether correlation, covariance, or covariance conjunction methods are used.Conclusions These results demonstrate the practical and theoretical utility of isolating changes in shared signal, improving the ability to interpret observed functional connectivity change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.11.011

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cole, M. W., Yang, G. J., Murray, J. D., Repovš, G., & Anticevic, A.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Ljubljana (SI)
Corresponding author
Cole, Michael W.
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-02
Volume
259
Pages
22-39
ISSN
0165-0270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178864546
Cited by
60
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • 16 NIH Institutes and Centers
  • NIH Blueprint for Neuroscience Research
  • McDonnell Center for Systems Neuroscience at Washington University
  • National Institute of Health Center of Biomedical Research Excellence (COBRE) (1P20RR021938-01A2)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
functional connectivity, variance normalization, covariance, correlation, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Computer Simulation, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Neurological, Schizophrenia, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review