Cited by 435Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Research Topics

Disruption of cortical association networks in schizophrenia and psychotic bipolar disorder

Open access
Baker, Justin T., Holmes, Avram J., Masters, Grace A., Yeo, B. T. Thomas, Krienen, Fenna, Buckner, Randy L., Öngür, Dost·2014·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Psychotic disorders (including schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and psychotic bipolar disorder) are devastating illnesses characterized by breakdown in the integration of information processing. Recent advances in neuroimaging allow for the estimation of brain networks on the basis of intrinsic functional connectivity, but the specific network abnormalities in psychotic disorders are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To compare intrinsic functional connectivity across the cerebral cortex in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders or psychotic bipolar disorder and healthy controls. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We studied 100 patients from an academic psychiatric hospital (28 patients with schizophrenia, 32 patients with schizoaffective disorder, and 40 patients with bipolar disorder with psychosis) and 100 healthy controls matched for age, sex, race, handedness, and scan quality from December 2009 to October 2011. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Functional connectivity profiles across 122 regions that covered the entire cerebral cortex. RESULTS: Relative to the healthy controls, individuals with a psychotic illness had disruption across several brain networks, with preferential reductions in functional connectivity within the frontoparietal control network (P < .05, corrected for family-wise error rate). This functionally defined network includes portions of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, posteromedial prefrontal cortex, lateral parietal cortex, and posterior temporal cortex. This effect was seen across diagnoses and persisted after matching patients and controls on the basis of scan quality. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our study results support the view that cortical information processing is disrupted in psychosis and provides new evidence that disruptions within the frontoparietal control network may be a shared feature across both schizophrenia and affective psychosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.3469

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Complex, distributed disruptions in resting-state networks are consistently implicated in Schizophrenia, ADHD, and Autism.

    “Complex, distributed disruptions in resting-state networks are consistently implicated in Schizophrenia (Baker et al., 2014; Khadka et al., 2013; Satterthwaite et al., 2015), ADHD (Castellanos and Aoki, 2016; Fair et al., 2012b), and Autism (Kessler et al., 2016; Moseley et al., 2015; Supekar et al., 2013)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, J. T., Holmes, A. J., Masters, G. A., Yeo, B. T. T., Krienen, F., Buckner, R. L., & Öngür, D.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Psychotic Disorders Division, McLean Hospital, Belmont, Massachusetts3Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Corresponding author
Baker, Justin T.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2014-02-01
Volume
71
Issue
2
Pages
109
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170422206
Cited by
435
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 1
FWCI
14.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k23mh104515-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH094594, K23-MH104515, K23MH079982, K01MH099232)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
schizophrenia, psychotic bipolar disorder, schizoaffective disorder, intrinsic functional connectivity, frontoparietal network, cerebral cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, lateral parietal cortex, posterior temporal cortex, psychosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Association, Bipolar Disorder, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Nerve Net, Parietal Lobe, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Prefrontal Cortex, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review