Cited by 283Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Catastrophizing, depression and the sensory, affective and evaluative aspects of chronic pain

Geisser, Michael E., Robinson, Michael E., Keefe, Francis J., Weiner, Marni L.·1994·Pain

Abstract

Research has shown that catastrophizing is related to increased depression and chronic pain. However, some researchers have questioned the utility of catastrophizing as a separate construct, suggesting that it may just be a symptom of depression. The present investigation used path analysis to determine if catastrophizing was related to McGill Pain Questionnaire scores when controlling for depression as assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory in a group of 85 chronic pain patients. According to Fields' model of the relationship between pain and depression, we predicted that catastrophizing would mediate the the relationship between depression and the evaluative and affective aspects of pain, but not the sensory aspect. The resulting path coefficients appear to support these predictions. The results suggest that catastrophizing is a separate construct which may impact on pain perception and treatment. The data also provide some support for Field's neurobiological model of the relationship between depression and pain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90050-7

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pain catastrophizing has emerged as one of the most important predictors of pain, accounting for 7% to 31% of the variance in pain ratings.

    “Pain catastrophizing, the tendency to focus on pain and negatively evaluate one's ability to deal with pain, has emerged as one of the most important predictors of pain, accounting for 7% to 31% of the variance in pain ratings.27,119”
  • Evidence indicates that pain catastrophizing is an important predictor of pain outcomes even after controlling for depression.

    “evidence indicates that pain catastrophizing is an important predictor of pain outcomes even after controlling for depression.27,30,42,48,118”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geisser, M. E., Robinson, M. E., Keefe, F. J., & Weiner, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Geisser, Michael E.
Venue
Pain
Published
1994-10
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
79-83
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2122861239
Cited by
283
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 15
FWCI
3.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
pain catastrophizing, depression, chronic pain, McGill Pain Questionnaire, pain perception, mediation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review