Cited by 67Memory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Extinction learning in childhood anxiety disorders, obsessive compulsive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder: implications for treatment

Open access
McGuire, Joseph F., Orr, Scott P., Essoe, Joey K.-Y., McCracken, James T., Storch, Eric A., Piacentini, John·2016·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Threat conditioning and extinction play an important role in anxiety disorders, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Although these conditions commonly affect children, threat conditioning and extinction have been primarily studied in adults. However, differences in phenomenology and neural architecture prohibit the generalization of adult findings to youth. AREAS COVERED: A comprehensive literature search using PubMed and PsycInfo was conducted to identify studies that have used differential conditioning tasks to examine threat acquisition and extinction in youth. The information obtained from this review helps to clarify the influence of these processes on the etiology and treatment of youth with OCD, PTSD and other anxiety disorders. Thirty studies of threat conditioning and extinction were identified Expert commentary: Youth with anxiety disorders, OCD, and PTSD have largely comparable threat acquisition relative to unaffected controls, with some distinctions noted for youth with PTSD or youth who have suffered maltreatment. However, impaired extinction was consistently observed across youth with these disorders and appears to be consistent with deficiencies in inhibitory learning. Incorporating strategies to improve inhibitory learning may improve extinction learning within extinction-based treatments like cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Strategies to improve inhibitory learning in CBT are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14737175.2016.1199276

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inhibitory learning mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in fear extinction for children with anxiety disorders as well as adults.

    “Inhibitory learning mechanisms have been suggested to play a role in fear extinction for children with anxiety disorders as well as adults (McGuire, Orr, Essoe et al., 2016; McGuire, Orr, Wu et al., 2016), but more research examining the inhibitory learning model in exposure with children is needed.”

    From Enhancing Inhibitory Learning: The Utility of Variability in Exposure (2019) · cites this paper as McGuire, Orr, Essoe et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8](POTS) POTS Cognitive-behavior therapy, sertraline, and their combination for children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder JAMA 292 16 1969 1976 2004 15507582

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGuire, J. F., Orr, S. P., Essoe, J. K.-Y., McCracken, J. T., Storch, E. A., & Piacentini, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
McGuire, Joseph F.
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2016-06-27
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
1155-1174
ISSN
  • 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8360
OpenAlex
W2412831890
Cited by
67
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4
FWCI
0.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH073517)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
extinction learning, fear conditioning, childhood anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, inhibitory learning, differential conditioning, cognitive behavioral therapy, maltreatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Humans, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review