Cited by 19Digital Mental Health InterventionsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Treatment and Access

Effectiveness of the internet-based Unified Protocol transdiagnostic intervention for the treatment of depression, anxiety and related disorders in a primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Timulak, Ladislav, Richards, Derek, Bhandal-Griffin, Louise, Healy, Patrick, Azevedo, Juliana, Connon, Graham, Martin, Elaine, Kearney, Aoife +9 more·2022·Trials

Abstract

Background: Research has shown that internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) can be a very promising solution to increase access to and the dissemination of evidence-based treatments to all of the population in need. However, iCBT is still underutilized in clinical contexts, such as primary care. In order to achieve the effective implementation of these protocols, more studies in ecological settings are needed. The Unified Protocol (UP) is a transdiagnostic CBT protocol for the treatment of emotional disorders, which includes depression, anxiety and related disorders, that has shown its efficacy across different contexts and populations. An internet-based UP (iUP) programme has recently been developed as an emerging internet-based treatment for emotional disorders. However, the internet-delivered version of the UP (iUP) has not yet been examined empirically. The current project seeks to analyse the effectiveness of the iUP as a treatment for depression, anxiety and related emotional disorders in a primary care public health setting. Methods: The current study will employ a parallel-group, randomized controlled trial design. Participants will be randomly assigned to (a) the internet-based Unified Protocol (iUP), or (b) enhanced waiting list control (eWLC). Randomization will follow a 2:1 allocation ratio, with sample size calculations suggesting a required sample of 120 (iUP=80; eWLC=40). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) will be used for assessing potential participants. The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) and the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale (ODSIS) as well as other standardized questionnaires will be used for assessments at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks and 12 weeks from baseline and for the iUP condition during the follow-up. Discussion: Combining the advantages of a transdiagnostic treatment with an online delivery format may have the potential to significantly lower the burden of emotional disorders in public health primary care setting. Anxiety and depression, often comorbid, are the most prevalent psychological disorders in primary care. Because the iUP allows for the treatment of different disorders and comorbidity, this treatment could represent an adequate choice for patients that demand mental health care in a primary care setting. Trial registration: ISRCTN18056450 https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN18056450.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13063-022-06551-y

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research on online UP and online interventions for AjD revealed a between-group effect size of d = 0.5 and a within-group effect size of d = 0.63.

    “Previous research on an online UP intervention and online interventions for AjD has revealed a between-group effect size at the level of d = 0.5 and a within-group effect size at the level of d = 0.63 [42, 87].”

    From Effectiveness and mediators of change of an online CBT intervention for students with adjustment disorder—study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (2023) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Method > Sample size section uses a post-treatment between-group effect size of d = 0.5 for its power calculation, describing it as in line with previous research. The paper does not report a within-group effect size of d = 0.63 or link that figure to online interventions for adjustment disorder. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [36]Barlow DH Farchione TJ Sauer-Zavala S Latin HM Ellard KK Bullis JR Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Workbook (2nd ed) 2018 New York Oxford University Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Timulak, L., Richards, D., Bhandal-Griffin, L., Healy, P., Azevedo, J., Connon, G., Martin, E., Kearney, A., O’Kelly, C., Enrique, A., Eilert, N., O’Brien, S., Harty, S., González-Robles, A., Eustis, E. H., Barlow, D. H., & Farchione, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Trinity College Dublin (IE)
  • Health Service Executive (IE)
  • Universidad de Zaragoza (ES)
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Trials
Published
2022-08-31
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
721-721
ISSN
1745-6215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293767748
Cited by
19
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Trinity's Access to Research Output (TARA) (Trinity College Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zaguan (University of Zaragoza Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
SilverCloud Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, Unified Protocol, transdiagnostic treatment, depression, anxiety, primary care, online intervention, emotional disorders, comorbidities, waitlist control
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Humans, Primary Health Care, Treatment Outcome, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review