The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Whole Trait Theory
Open accessAbstract
Personality researchers should modify models of traits to include mechanisms of differential reaction to situations. Whole Trait Theory does so via five main points. First, the descriptive side of traits should be conceptualized as density distributions of states. Second, it is important to provide an explanatory account of the Big 5 traits. Third, adding an explanatory account to the Big 5 creates two parts to traits, an explanatory part and a descriptive part, and these two parts should be recognized as separate entities that are joined into whole traits. Fourth, Whole Trait Theory proposes that the explanatory side of traits consists of social-cognitive mechanisms. Fifth, social-cognitive mechanisms that produce Big-5 states should be identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Whole-Trait Theory (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015) and the TESSERA framework (Wrzus & Roberts, 2017) proposed that states are manifesting as an interaction of traits with specific situations.”
From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research
Krueger, R. F., & Johnson, W. (2008) · Cited by 7,884
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530 · cited 1×
“The trait approach, as instantiated in the Big 5/HEXACO model (Ashton & Lee, 2009; Costa & McCrae, 2006; DeYoung, Weisberg, Quilty, & Peterson, 2013; Goldberg, 1992; Johnson, 1997, Perugini & Gallucci, 1997; see also Wright et al., 2013), has made remarkable progress in identifying the content of…”
MethodMadison, P., & Mischel, W. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421067 · Cited by 4,395 · cited 1×
“The social cognitive approach starts with the observation that trait manifestations appear to be inconsistent (Cervone, 2005; Hartshorne & May, 1928; Mischel, 1968).”
BackgroundMischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246 · Cited by 3,889 · cited 8×
“A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript competencies, self-regulatory plans, and goals (Allport, 1937; Mischel & Shoda, 1995; Mischel, 1973).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPersonality: A Psychological Interpretation
Jenkins, J. G., & Allport, G. W. (1938) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415717 · Cited by 3,215
Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality
Mischel, W. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0035002 · Cited by 3,181 · cited 6×
“Although the trait approach would allow for some variability in behavior, it does not appear to allow the high degree of variable responding required in the social-cognitive approach (Allport, 1937; Fleeson & Noftle, 2009; Mischel, 1973).”
BackgroundInfluentialRoberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x · Cited by 2,361
Personality and the Prediction of Consequential Outcomes
Ozer, D. J., & Benet‐Martínez, V. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 · Cited by 2,307 · cited 1×
“Traits matter to important outcomes (Duckworth, Weir, Tsukayama, & Kwok, 2012; Ozer & Benet-Martínez, 2006; Roberts, Kuncel, Shiner, Caspi, & Goldberg, 2007; Turiano, Chapman, Gruenewald, & Mroczek, 2013), and observers agree about Big 5 levels of targets (Vazire, 2010).”
Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002046 · Cited by 2,046
A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality.
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.3.204 · Cited by 1,992 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, although traits do a reasonable job of describing behavior and identity, even on that front they fall somewhat short (Kandler, Zimmerman, & McAdams, 2014; McAdams & Pals, 2006).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1982). Analyzing the construction of consistency in personality. Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 233–262).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 839
The Narcissism in Situations Framework: Person and Situation Effects on State NarcissismPreprint
Maaß, U., Lüdtke, O., & Ziegler, M. D. (2018) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/usg8k · Cited by 5
Horstmann, K. T., Rauthmann, J. F., Sherman, R. A., & Ziegler, M. D. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/bcmyt · Cited by 4
Abrahams, L., Rauthmann, J. F., & Fruyt, F. D. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/3rhdy · Cited by 3
Individual Differences in Contingencies Between Situation Characteristics and Personality StatesPreprint
Kuper, N., Breil, S. M., Horstmann, K. T., Roemer, L., Lischetzke, T., Sherman, R. A., Back, M. D., Denissen, J. J. A., & Rauthmann, J. F. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/7phng · Cited by 4
Werner, M. A., Borgmann, M., & Laan, E. T. M. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/9a2nk · Cited by 4
Veilleux, J. C., Clift, J. B., Brott, K. H., Warner, E. A., Schreiber, R. E., Henderson, H., & Shelton, D. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2dcvf · Cited by 4
Using youth-specific approaches to illuminate character-well-being relations
Abbasi‐Asl, R., Yu, D. L., Hasse, A., Lerner, R. M., Tirrell, J. M., Dowling, E. M., Sim, A., Lerner, J. V., Zhang, R., Keces, N., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Adolescence and Youth · doi:10.1080/02673843.2025.2498053 · Cited by 3
“Beginning in the third decade of the 21 st century, whole trait theory (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015; Jayawickreme & Fleeson, 2017; Jayawickreme et al., 2014) – which posits that personality traits are best understood as distributions of personality states, capturing both an individual’s average…”
Narrative Agency and Communion as Predictors of Trait and State Self‐Esteem Dynamics
Guðmundsdóttir, G. R., de Moor, E. L., & Reitz, A. K. (2025) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.70000 · Cited by 3
Behavioral Tendencies of Happiness: A Person‐In‐Context Approach to Construct Measurement
Robinson, M. D., Irvin, R. L., Asad, M. R., Fereidouni, H., Rahier, L. L., & Lawrence, G. A. (2025) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.70011 · Cited by 3
Ten Concerns About Volitional Personality-Change Interventions—and How to Address Them
Haehner, P., Asselmann, E., Baumgardt, S., Brüggmann, L., Denissen, J. J. A., Harzer, C., Juchem, C. M., Krämer, M. D., Kuper, N., Puhlmann, L. M. C., et al. (2026) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916261466950 · Cited by 3
Individual differences in violent extremism
Obaidi, M., Bergh, R., Benningstad, N. C. G., & Dovidio, J. F. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-025-00509-y · Cited by 4
“Personality research distinguishes between state variability (immediate changes within an individual in response to new circumstances) and trait variability (consistent differences between individuals 274–276 ).”
Wu, Y., Xu, J., Shen, Y., Wang, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12889 · Cited by 3
Aesthetic Dispositions, Aesthetic Engagement, and Meaning in Life
Wilt, J. A., Exline, J. J., Schlegel, R. J., & Sherman, A. (2024) · Empirical Studies of the Arts · doi:10.1177/02762374241248117 · Cited by 3
“This rationale aligns with personality approaches that distinguish between states, which are dynamic and occur over shorter times, and traits, which represent aggregates of states (e.g., Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015; Wrzus & Roberts, 2017).”
Individual differences in escalation of commitment: a multi-level adaptive learning perspective
Wong, K. F. E., Kwong, J. Y. Y., & Yik, M. (2024) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-024-00339-7 · Cited by 3
“…this framework in four dimensions of individual differences that represent the full range of understanding the dynamics of individual differences [13, 14], namely, (a) the origin of individual differences, (b) the emergence of individual differences, (c) the stability of individual differences,…”
A hierarchical trait and state model for decoding dyadic social interactions
Wu, Q., Nakauchi, S., Shehata, M., & Shinsuke Shimojo, A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-95916-9 · Cited by 3
The Plot Thickens: Personality and Its Development
Lapsley, D. K. (2016) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000447251 · Cited by 3
“Whole trait theory, for example, views social cognitive mechanisms as the explanatory side of traits [Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015].”
BackgroundThomas, L. B., Fadeeva, A., & Oliver, E. J. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109767 · Cited by 3
Barber, S. J., Kireeva, D., Seliger, J., & Jayawickreme, E. (2020) · Innovation in Aging · doi:10.1093/geroni/igaa010 · Cited by 3
Self-citationPersonality Affect Construal Theory
Thapa, S., Beck, E. D., & Tay, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108573887.004 · Cited by 3
Modelo predictivo de conducta de infidelidad sexual entre personas casadas
de la Rubia, J. M. (2020) · CienciaUAT · doi:10.29059/cienciauat.v15i1.1383 · Cited by 3
Personality Factors Predicting Cyberbullying and Online Harassment
Ildırım, E. (2020) · Advances in human resources management and organizational development book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4912-4.ch007 · Cited by 3
Personality Traits and Mental Disorders
Hakulinen, C. A., Jokela, M. M., Mika Kivimaki, B., & Elovainio, M. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.018 · Cited by 4
Anxiety, Depression and Cognitive Dysfunction
Eysenck, M. W., & Holmes, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.033 · Cited by 3
Vaid, S. S., Abdullah, S., Thomaz, E., & Harari, G. M. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819200-9.00020-x · Cited by 3
Intra-individual variability in personality: A methodological review
Ness, A. M., Foley, K. O., & Heggestad, E. D. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819200-9.00007-7 · Cited by 3
Salgado, J. F., Anderson, N. R., & Moscoso, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.040 · Cited by 4
The psychological profile of group rhythmic gymnasts
Manos, M., & Popescu, L. (2019) · Discobolul – Physical Education, Sport and Kinetotherapy Journal · doi:10.35189/iphm.icpesk.2019.19 · Cited by 2
“Several theoretical frameworks of integrated personality have been developed so far (Cervone, 2004; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015), but empirical research is still in its early stages (Beckmann & Wood, 2017).”
BackgroundReinelt, T., Frey, C., Oertel, R., Suppiger, D., & Natalucci, G. (2022) · Journal of Open Psychology Data · doi:10.5334/jopd.63 · Cited by 2
Meyer, J., Schmidt, F. T. C., Fleckenstein, J., & Köller, O. (2022) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjep.12543 · Cited by 4
Leveraging the Experience Sampling Method to Study Meaning in Everyday Life
Heintzelman, S. J., & Mohideen, F. (2022) · Atlantis highlights in social sciences, education and humanities/Atlantis Highlights in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities · doi:10.2991/978-94-6463-096-1_4 · Cited by 3
Ye, S. S., So, J. J. M., Ng, T. K., & Ma, M. Z. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1074334 · Cited by 3
“According to the whole trait theory (Fleeson and Jayawickreme, 2015), behaviors are not only influenced by relatively stable traits, but also the momentary states and situational factors.”
BackgroundAitken, J. A., Keeler, K. R., Dalal, R. S., & Kriz, S. (2023) · Journal of Business and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10869-023-09892-w · Cited by 4
“…as the mean of the temporal density distribution (for seminal work in the personality and social psychology literature, see Fleeson, 2001; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015; for empirical examples in organizational journals, see Green et al., 2019; Matta et al., 2017; Matta et al., 2020).”
Downscaling with benefits: A road forward for capturing intra-individual variations in personality
Schock, A.-K., Hausinger, T., & Pletzer, B. A. (2024) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2024.112636 · Cited by 3
Stevenor, B. A., Hickman, L., Zickar, M. J., Wimbush, F., & Beck, W. (2024) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12480 · Cited by 5
Roemer, L., Rammstedt, B., & Lechner, C. M. (2024) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2024.102522 · Cited by 3
Response to the critiques (and encouragements) on our critique of motivation constructs
Murayama, K., & Jach, H. K. (2025) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x24001353 · Cited by 3
Reynolds, C. J., Jayawickreme, E., Wheat, R., Stokes, E., Santos, C., Fleeson, W., & Furr, R. M. (2025) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070251338199 · Cited by 5
“Whole Trait Theory (WTT; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015, 2021) is one such dynamic theory that also fosters engagement with the philosophical literature on virtue and character development and has emerged as an important model of moral traits (Doris, 2022; Jeffrey & Beary, 2023; Wright et al., 2021).”
Self-citationModels of Personality Structure
Raad, B. D., & Barelds, D. P. H. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.012 · Cited by 4
Cognitive Processes and Models
Matthews, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.028 · Cited by 5
Integrative processes and personality coherence across levels of functioning
Fournier, M. A. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813995-0.00017-0 · Cited by 4
Basic Needs, Goals and Motivation
Szalma, J. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.030 · Cited by 3
Energy and Personality: A Bridge between Physics and Psychology
Caselles, A., Micó, J. C., & Amigó, S. (2021) · Mathematics · doi:10.3390/math9121339 · Cited by 3
Personality in Cross-Cultural Perspective
Dragūns, J. G., & Tanaka‐Matsumi, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.037 · Cited by 4
Arumäe, K., Vainik, U., & Mõttus, R. (2022) · Personality Science · doi:10.5964/ps.7583 · Cited by 3
“If personality traits represent the frequency of trait-relevant expressions (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015) such as certain kinds of behav iors, the current results are consistent with the view that personality traits can increase body weight through, for instance, altering the frequency of…”
ResultConnections to, Implications of, and Directions for a Cybernetic Theory of Psychopathology
Hopwood, C. J., & Schwaba, T. (2018) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2018.1513683 · Cited by 2
“…and the recent emphasis among basic personality psychologists on dynamic and relatively proximal processes hypothesized to give rise to betweenand within-person personality variation (e.g., Back et al., 2011; Baumert et al., 2017; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015; Roberts, 2018; Wrzus & Roberts, 2017).”
BackgroundModeling Dynamic Personality Theories in a Continuous-time Framework: An IllustrationPreprint
Hecht, M., Horstmann, K. T., Arnold, M., Sherman, R. A., & Voelkle, M. C. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/q97pz · Cited by 3
Little, B. R., & Balsari‐Palsule, S. (2020) · The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1002/9781119547143.ch51 · Cited by 3
Rein, M. T., Vogelsmeier, L. V. D. E., & Bolsinova, M. A. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/47bry · Cited by 4
Andresen, P. K., Schuurman, N. K., & Hamaker, E. L. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nqseu · Cited by 3
Reply: The PHIOMM Framework for Implementing Mindfulness in Public Health, With Groundwork
Oman, D. (2025) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-025-02553-4 · Cited by 4
Çelik, P., Storme, M., & Myszkowski, N. (2022) · Group Decision and Negotiation · doi:10.1007/s10726-022-09778-x · Cited by 2
“This could explain why classic and broad personality traits – which describe average behavioral tendencies across situations (Fleeson 2004; Fleeson and Jayawickreme 2015) – have limited predictive value for negotiation outcomes (Sharma et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialPrimary affective systems and personality: Disentangling the within‐person reciprocal relationships
Ion, A. (2023) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12908 · Cited by 2
O'Connor, P. J., Wiewiora, A. M., & Spark, A. (2024) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/87569728241299290 · Cited by 2
“Consistent with theoretical perspectives of within-person variation (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015, 2021), we expect that the effects of state Tolerance of Ambiguity will be signi fi cant, even when controlling for the effects of trait Tolerance of Ambiguity (i.e., we believe that variation in…”
InfluentialIntroversion in Leaders: Role-Congruent Leader Behavior and Thriving in Daily Working Life
Schmidbauer, J., Niessen, C., Spark, A., O'Connor, P. J., & Jimmieson, N. L. (2025) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/00218863251342832 · Cited by 2
“Traits are de fi ned as density distributions of states, with introversion characterized by a distribution centered toward the introverted end of the extraversion continuum (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015).”
The envy-contempt spiral: affective self-regulation in grandiose narcissism
Raftopoulos, A., & Unterrainer, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1620201 · Cited by 2
“These approaches focus on processes that explain personality dynamics (e.g., 18, 70).”
Beyond Tech: The Human Element in Industry 5.0 Projects
Santos, J. M. R. C. A., Freitas, F. S., & Fernandes, G. (2025) · Project Management Journal · doi:10.1177/87569728251349774 · Cited by 3
“…being the predominant theoretical framework for understanding personality structure and individual differences (Langston & Sykes, 1997; McCrae, 1999), the Big Five model has been shown not to give a thorough explanation of how individual traits manifest in behaviors (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015).”
Buades‐Rotger, M., Catena, A. M., Recio, G., Cano-Gallent, M., Maymí, J. N. I., Masip, A. F., & Gallardo‐Pujol, D. (2025) · Health & Justice · doi:10.1186/s40352-025-00351-7 · Cited by 3
Vohra, P., Irvin, R. L., Asad, M. R., & Robinson, M. D. (2025) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104672 · Cited by 2
Dowgwillo, E. A., & Pincus, A. L. (2025) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223891.2025.2584681 · Cited by 2
“Together, these findings not only provide support for the construct validity of SB-PNI scores but also align with broader trait theories that suggest that trait variables influence our state experiences (Allport, 1937; Fleeson, 2001; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015).”
Li, F., Mao, H., Zhang, S., & Lin, X. (2025) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-025-03806-6 · Cited by 2
“Based on the state-trait continuum theory [55], whole trait theory [68], and the cognitive-affective personality system model [69], this study positioned all variables at the level of relatively stable individual characteristics.”
Stress Generation Across Hours, Days, and 1 Month
Haehner, P., Schellenberg, L., Krämer, M. D., Wright, A. J., Bleidorn, W., & Hopwood, C. J. (2026) · Clinical Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/21677026261471782 · Cited by 2
Narrative Identity in the Social World
McLean, K. C., Syed, M., Haraldsson, K. G., & Lowe, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.035 · Cited by 2
Lynam, D. R., Vize, C. E., & Miller, J. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.043 · Cited by 2
Jayawickreme, E., & Zachry, C. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.032 · Cited by 2
Self-citationThe Role of Individual Cultural Values in Personal Innovativeness
Rathnayake, N. D. N. B. (2021) · Wayamba Journal of Management · doi:10.4038/wjm.v12i1.7515 · Cited by 2
Murtadho, A. M., Supriatna, E., & Suhendar, S. (2021) · JELL (Journal of English Language and Literature) STIBA-IEC Jakarta · doi:10.37110/jell.v6i2.127 · Cited by 2
“For example: Public speaking anxiety, impatience while waiting in line, etc. (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015).”
BackgroundErdös, T., Wilt, J. A., & Tichelmann, M. (2022) · Journal of Management Development · doi:10.1108/jmd-02-2022-0034 · Cited by 4
Personality dynamics: The integration of process and trait
Wu, F., & Yueqin, H. U. (2023) · Advances in Psychological Science · doi:10.3724/sp.j.1042.2023.01269 · Cited by 2
Kingsbury, C., & Bernard, P. (2023) · Health Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.5334/hpb.43 · Cited by 2
Мамаева-Найлз, В. Д. (2023) · Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University Psychology · doi:10.21638/spbu16.2023.306 · Cited by 2
Mousavi, S. Z., Borhani, K., Gharibzadeh, S., & Bakouie, F. (2023) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2023.101116 · Cited by 3
Zampetakis, L. A. (2024) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.1500 · Cited by 2
Kirschner, M., Golsteijn, R. H. J., van Tuijl, P., van den Broek, L., Savelberg, H. H. C. M., & de Groot, R. H. M. (2024) · Mental health and physical activity · doi:10.1016/j.mhpa.2024.100636 · Cited by 2
Impulsivity, Digital Maturity, and Morality of Pakistani TikTok Users
Gulzar, T., Nazir, A., Mehmood, H., & Noureen, A. (2024) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/2024/6002586 · Cited by 7
“In the context of morality, whole trait theory states that people have enduring traits, which include empathy or a dedication to honesty, which can a ff ect how they make moral decisions [20].”
Kuijpers, E., Wille, B., Vossen, J., & Hofmans, J. (2025) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070241309491 · Cited by 3
“…models that capture within-person variability, or fl uctuations around one ’ s baseline (e.g., TESSERA model, Wrzus & Roberts, 2017; Whole Trait theory, Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015; DATA model, Woods et al., 2019), the PersDyn model is especially relevant for our purpose because it stresses the…”
InfluentialMeasuring personality Traits:Simulations Exploring (Mis)Alignment between methods and measurands
Durkee, P. K. (2025) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104601 · Cited by 2
Evaluating the predictive validity of behavioral signatures in situational judgment tests
Leyens, T., Mussel, P., Hewig, J. S., & Hofmans, J. (2025) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104604 · Cited by 2
Extraversion’s link to reward sensitivity: evidence from an emotion dynamics task
Robinson, M. D., Asad, M. R., Irvin, R. L., Fereidouni, H., & Talabad, P. Z. (2025) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-025-10131-3 · Cited by 2
“The explanatory approach to personality seeks to identify mechanisms, which are often motivational in nature (Per - vin, 1994 ; Watson, 2000 ), that link a personality trait to its state-related manifestations (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015 ; Hampson, 2012 ).”
Revisiting the IPIP-NEO personality hierarchy with taxonomic graph analysis
Samo, A., Garrido, L. E., Abad, F. J., Golino, H. F., McAbee, S. T., & Christensen, A. P. (2025) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070251352590 · Cited by 3
“…the pursuit of goals (Conscientiousness) that emerges from low emotional volatility (Neuroticism), and an orientation toward exploring novel internal (Openness to Experience) and external (Sociability) states in the pursuit of goals, respectively (DeYoung, 2006, 2015; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015).”
Beyond the text: Voice as a stable marker of self-esteem
Zang, X., Wang, S., & Yang, J. (2025) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2025.104636 · Cited by 2
Measured but Not Induced Perspective-taking Predicts Success in Coalition Formation
Cantiani, A., van Beest, I., & Erle, T. M. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672251349706 · Cited by 2
“According to Whole Trait Theory, people differ in their base-line tendency to produce such states.”
InfluentialHisler, G. C., Križan, Z., Manuck, S. B., Marsland, A. L., Hasler, B. P., & Wright, A. G. (2025) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/08902070251408107 · Cited by 2
“Though personality states vary across time, a person ’ s mean level and distribution of these states are thought to compose their trait levels (DeYoung, 2015; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015).”
Perspectives and Advances in Personality
Coulacoglou, C., & Saklofske, D. H. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-802219-1.00009-2 · Cited by 4
The Bingah scale: A development of the happiness measurement scale in the Sundanese
Augustiya, T., Lestari, A., Budiman, H., Maharani, R. S., & Anggraini, M. (2020) · Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya · doi:10.15575/jpib.v3i1.6478 · Cited by 2
“Peneliti menggunakan metode kuantitatif, dimana data yang tersaji berisi angka-angka dan 64 JPIB : Jurnal Psikologi Islam dan Budaya, April 2020, Vol.3 No.1 hasil pengolahan datanya menggunakan program-program statistika (Baumert dkk., 2017; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2014).”
BackgroundA Review of Quantitative Methods to Measure Workplace Affect
Yang, L., McMahon, K., & Zhen, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108573887.007 · Cited by 2
Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2020) · The Clinical Supervisor · doi:10.1080/07325223.2020.1830459 · Cited by 3
Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.020 · Cited by 4
Waring, S. V., Sharpinskyi, K., & Kelly, A. C. (2022) · Body Image · doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.08.005 · Cited by 4
PARENTAL ROLE ORIENTATION’S INFLUENCE ON CHILDREN’S PERSONALITY FORMATION
Meng, Z., Luen, L. C., & Abidin, N. H. Z. (2023) · International Journal of Education & Technology · doi:10.59021/ijetech.v1i3.22 · Cited by 2
“Fleeson & Jayawickreme’s personality trait theory explains the formation of personality through traits, where a list of personality traits can be used to describe individuals and explain the reasons for trait formation through external behaviour (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015).”
BackgroundThe framework for creating a psychological assessment tool based on interactive storytelling
Prys, M., Różewski, P., & Ziegler, M. D. (2019) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.395 · Cited by 2
Models of Physical Health and Personality
Heilmayr, D., & Friedman, H. S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108264822.019 · Cited by 2
Primal world beliefs correlate strongly but differentially with character strengthsPreprint
Stahlmann, A. G., & Ruch, W. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/qv2bp · Cited by 2
Kingsbury, C., & Bernard, P. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zm39x · Cited by 2
Schmitt, M., & Blum, G. S. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1922-1 · Cited by 2
Stability and Change in Dispositional Envy: Longitudinal Evidence on Envy as a Stable TraitPreprint
Erz, E., & Rentzsch, K. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/enyw2 · Cited by 2
Kroencke, L., Kuper, N., Mota, S., Utesch, K., Zeigler‐Hill, V., & Back, M. D. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/sz2jh · Cited by 2
The Structure of Self-Related Core BeliefsPreprint
Mussel, P. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ky4vu · Cited by 2
Theses for a metatheory of personality
Konstabel, K. (2019) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.003 · Cited by 1
Just because it’s dark doesn’t mean that we can’t go there
Harms, P. D., Wood, D., & DeSimone, J. A. (2019) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2019.40 · Cited by 1
Murillo, I. P., Arroyo-Zúñiga, D., & Paniagua, A. A. (2022) · Wimb Lu · doi:10.15517/wl.v17i2.52724 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E.
- Affiliations
- Wake Forest University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fleeson, William
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- 82-92
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4472377
- OpenAlex
- W2059608342
- Cited by
- 839
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 13
- FWCI
- 40.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Templeton World Charity Foundation
- John Templeton Foundation
- National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- Whole Trait Theory, personality traits, Big Five personality traits, trait models, trait structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review