The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Whole Trait Theory
Open accessAbstract
Personality researchers should modify models of traits to include mechanisms of differential reaction to situations. Whole Trait Theory does so via five main points. First, the descriptive side of traits should be conceptualized as density distributions of states. Second, it is important to provide an explanatory account of the Big 5 traits. Third, adding an explanatory account to the Big 5 creates two parts to traits, an explanatory part and a descriptive part, and these two parts should be recognized as separate entities that are joined into whole traits. Fourth, Whole Trait Theory proposes that the explanatory side of traits consists of social-cognitive mechanisms. Fifth, social-cognitive mechanisms that produce Big-5 states should be identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Whole-Trait Theory (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015) and the TESSERA framework (Wrzus & Roberts, 2017) proposed that states are manifesting as an interaction of traits with specific situations.”
From Investigating state and trait aspects of resilience using Generalizability theory (2024) · cites this paper as Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research
Krueger, R. F., & Johnson, W. (2008) · Cited by 7,884
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure
Goldberg, L. R. (1992) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · Cited by 5,530 · cited 1×
“The trait approach, as instantiated in the Big 5/HEXACO model (Ashton & Lee, 2009; Costa & McCrae, 2006; DeYoung, Weisberg, Quilty, & Peterson, 2013; Goldberg, 1992; Johnson, 1997, Perugini & Gallucci, 1997; see also Wright et al., 2013), has made remarkable progress in identifying the content of…”
MethodMadison, P., & Mischel, W. (1968) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1421067 · Cited by 4,395 · cited 1×
“The social cognitive approach starts with the observation that trait manifestations appear to be inconsistent (Cervone, 2005; Hartshorne & May, 1928; Mischel, 1968).”
BackgroundMischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.246 · Cited by 3,889 · cited 8×
“A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript A uthor M anuscript competencies, self-regulatory plans, and goals (Allport, 1937; Mischel & Shoda, 1995; Mischel, 1973).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPersonality: A Psychological Interpretation
Jenkins, J. G., & Allport, G. W. (1938) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1415717 · Cited by 3,215
Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality
Mischel, W. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0035002 · Cited by 3,181 · cited 6×
“Although the trait approach would allow for some variability in behavior, it does not appear to allow the high degree of variable responding required in the social-cognitive approach (Allport, 1937; Fleeson & Noftle, 2009; Mischel, 1973).”
BackgroundInfluentialRoberts, B. W., Kuncel, N. R., Shiner, R., Caspi, A., & Goldberg, L. R. (2007) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x · Cited by 2,361
Personality and the Prediction of Consequential Outcomes
Ozer, D. J., & Benet‐Martínez, V. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190127 · Cited by 2,307 · cited 1×
“Traits matter to important outcomes (Duckworth, Weir, Tsukayama, & Kwok, 2012; Ozer & Benet-Martínez, 2006; Roberts, Kuncel, Shiner, Caspi, & Goldberg, 2007; Turiano, Chapman, Gruenewald, & Mroczek, 2013), and observers agree about Big 5 levels of targets (Vazire, 2010).”
Depue, R. A., & Collins, P. F. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002046 · Cited by 2,046
A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality.
McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.61.3.204 · Cited by 1,992 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, although traits do a reasonable job of describing behavior and identity, even on that front they fall somewhat short (Kandler, Zimmerman, & McAdams, 2014; McAdams & Pals, 2006).”
BackgroundThe HEXACO-60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Personality
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1080/00223890902935878 · Cited by 1,709 · cited 1×
“The trait approach, as instantiated in the Big 5/HEXACO model (Ashton & Lee, 2009; Costa & McCrae, 2006; DeYoung, Weisberg, Quilty, & Peterson, 2013; Goldberg, 1992; Johnson, 1997, Perugini & Gallucci, 1997; see also Wright et al., 2013), has made remarkable progress in identifying the content of…”
MethodFleeson, W. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.1011 · Cited by 1,436 · cited 12×
“…in affect, something that is commonly known to vary so much that it is hard to conceive of it as a trait; and (iii) more than the amount of variability between individuals, meaning that individuals differ from themselves more than they differ from others (Fleeson, 2001; Noftle & Fleeson, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationA Critique of Eysenck’s Theory of Personality
Gray, J. A. (1981) · A Model for Personality · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-67783-0_8 · Cited by 1,374
Personality: A Psychological Interpretation.
Chapman, D. W., & Āllport, G. W. (1938) · Sociometry · doi:10.2307/2785590 · Cited by 1,100
Who knows what about a person? The self–other knowledge asymmetry (SOKA) model.
Vazire, S. (2010) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0017908 · Cited by 1,080
Beech, H. R. (1969) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(69)90024-2 · Cited by 1,072
Watson, D. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1020 · Cited by 1,060 · cited 1×
“The state concept has been used to characterize emotions and anxiety for some time (e.g., Gerstorf, Siedlecki, Tucker-Drob, & Salthouse, 2009; Watson, 1988).”
MethodDeYoung, C. G. (2015) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004 · Cited by 1,057
(2001) · PubMed · Cited by 1,034
Self-citationTesting Predictions From Personality Neuroscience: Brain Structure and the Big Five
DeYoung, C. G., Hirsh, J. B., Shane, M. S., Papademetris, X., Rajeevan, N., & Gray, J. R. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610370159 · Cited by 995 · cited 1×
“In short, trait theory has described the what, but few theories have attempted to explain the why or how (with a few, mostly biological, exceptions, e.g., Depue & Collins, 1999; DeYoung, 2010; DeYoung et al., 2010;H. J. Eysenck, 1997; Gray, 1981; see also DeYoung, 2014 and Read et al., 2010).”
Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate.
Kenrick, D. T., & Funder, D. C. (1988) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.43.1.23 · Cited by 968 · cited 1×
“This is a difficult move to make because of the long history of antagonism between social-cognitive and trait approaches (Funder, 2009; Kenrick & Funder, 1988; Lucas & Donnellan, 2009).”
BackgroundHandbook of personality development
(2007) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.44-2967 · Cited by 933
Personality Development: Continuity and Change Over the Life Course
McAdams, D. P., & Olson, B. D. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100507 · Cited by 931 · cited 2×
“It includes variables such as goals, expectancies, competencies, and plans (Mischel, 1973), but goes beyond them to include narratives, scripts, defenses, and other variables (Demorest, Popovska, & Dabova, 2012; McAdams & Olson, 2010).”
BackgroundToward an Integrative Science of the Person
Mischel, W. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.042902.130709 · Cited by 922 · cited 8×
“One distinctive feature that distinguishes Whole Trait Theory from existing social-cognitive approaches such as CAPS (Mischel, 2004; Mischel & Shoda, 1995) is its grounding in the Big 5.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialHandbook of Personality Psychology
(1997) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-134645-4.x5000-8 · Cited by 708
Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research.
Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.2.230 · Cited by 656
Fleeson, W. (2004) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00280.x · Cited by 649
Self-citationFleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016786 · Cited by 636 · cited 4×
“Additional evidence that distributions are the descriptive side of traits is that distribution parameters correlate with self-reported questionnaire scores on the corresponding traits (Fleeson & Gallagher, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPersonality Architecture: Within-Person Structures and Processes
Cervone, D. (2004) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070133 · Cited by 540 · cited 1×
“The social cognitive approach starts with the observation that trait manifestations appear to be inconsistent (Cervone, 2005; Hartshorne & May, 1928; Mischel, 1968).”
BackgroundCramer, A. O. J., van der Sluis, S., Noordhof, A., Wichers, M., Geschwind, N., Aggen, S. H., Kendler, K. S., & Borsboom, D. (2012) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1866 · Cited by 512 · cited 6×
“Finally, situations, behaviors, and the links between them may cause each other (Cramer et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialPersonality Neuroscience and the Biology of Traits
DeYoung, C. G. (2010) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00327.x · Cited by 462 · cited 1×
“In short, trait theory has described the what, but few theories have attempted to explain the why or how (with a few, mostly biological, exceptions, e.g., Depue & Collins, 1999; DeYoung, 2010; DeYoung et al., 2010;H. J. Eysenck, 1997; Gray, 1981; see also DeYoung, 2014 and Read et al., 2010).”
BackgroundSituation-based contingencies underlying trait-content manifestation in behavior
Fleeson, W. (2007) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2007.00458.x · Cited by 455 · cited 8×
“Big 5 personality states are predictable from features of the situation (Bleidorn, 2009; Church et al., 2008; Clifton & Kuper, 2011; Côté et al., 2012; Fleeson, 2007; Fournier, Moskowitz, & Zuroff, 2009; Huang & Ryan, 2011; Judge et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationPersonality Processes: Mechanisms by Which Personality Traits “Get Outside the Skin”
Hampson, S. E. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100419 · Cited by 454 · cited 4×
“Because of the person-situation debate, trait and social-cognitive theories have been largely at odds with each other (Fleeson, 2012; Funder, 2009; Hampson, 2012; Lucas & Donnellan, 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialSnyder, M., & Stukas, A. A. (1999) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.273 · Cited by 441 · cited 1×
“…behaviors) count as internal or environmental events that feedback into the process, continuously adjusting the interpretative process (Mischel, 1973), and impacts of the outputs on the situation also change the environmental events, creating new situations (Snyder, 2006; Snyder & Stukas, 1999).”
BackgroundPersonality Development in the Context of the Neo-Socioanalytic Model of Personality
Roberts, B. W., & Wood, D. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315805610.ch2 · Cited by 397 · cited 1×
“For example, Costa and McCrae (2006) have motives and cognitions as an outcome of traits, McAdams and Olson (2010) and Roberts and Wood (2006) hold motivational and trait domains as separate domains of personality functioning, and Winter and colleagues (1998) suggested motives provide the direction…”
BackgroundZillig, L. M. P., Hemenover, S. H., & Dienstbier, R. A. (2002) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167202289013 · Cited by 348
Baird, B. M., Le, K., & Lucas, R. E. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.512 · Cited by 346 · cited 2×
“First, the actual manifestation of traits in everyday life took a form amenable to social-cognitive explanations (Baird et al., 2006; Fleeson, 2001; Fleeson & Gallagher, 2009; Timothy Church et al., 2013).”
BackgroundEysenck, H. J. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1224 · Cited by 337
The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-0573 · Cited by 314
Self-Regulation Underlies Temperament and Personality: An Integrative Developmental Framework
Denissen, J. J. A., van Aken, M. A. G., Penke, L., & Wood, D. (2013) · Child Development Perspectives · doi:10.1111/cdep.12050 · Cited by 306
McCabe, K. O., & Fleeson, W. (2012) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797612444904 · Cited by 302 · cited 6×
“Big 5 personality states are also predictable from the goals an individual is pursuing at the moment (Bleidorn, 2009; Heller et al., 2007; McCabe & Fleeson, 2012; Perunovic et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationFleeson, W., & Wilt, J. A. (2010) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00653.x · Cited by 300 · cited 1×
“Whole Trait Theory starts with the assertion that the descriptive side of traits is best thought of as density distributions of states (Baird, Le, & Lucas, 2006; Fleeson, 2001, 2012; Fleeson & Wilt, 2010; Judge, Simon, Hurst, & Kelley, 2013; Timothy Church et al., 2013).”
BackgroundSelf-citationUnifying the Aspects of the Big Five, the Interpersonal Circumplex, and Trait Affiliation
DeYoung, C. G., Weisberg, Y. J., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2012) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/jopy.12020 · Cited by 293
Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era
Funder, D. C. (2009) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.041 · Cited by 281 · cited 3×
“Because of the person-situation debate, trait and social-cognitive theories have been largely at odds with each other (Fleeson, 2012; Funder, 2009; Hampson, 2012; Lucas & Donnellan, 2009).”
BackgroundVirtue as Social Intelligence: An Empirically Grounded Theory
Snow, N. E. (2009) · Cited by 278
Recurrent Personality Dimensions in Inclusive Lexical Studies: Indications for a Big Six Structure
Saucier, G. (2009) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00593.x · Cited by 271 · cited 1×
“Evidence for the Big 5 includes strong crossquestionnaire (Costa & McCrae, 2006) and cross-cultural replicability (Saucier, 2009).”
BackgroundStates and traits in psychological assessment.
Steyer, R., Ferring, D., & Schmitt, M. (1992) · Open Repository and Bibliography (University of Luxembourg) · Cited by 266
A neural network model of the structure and dynamics of human personality.
Read, S. J., Monroe, B. M., Brownstein, A. L., Yang, Y., Chopra, G., & Miller, L. C. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0018131 · Cited by 257 · cited 8×
“Fortunately, Whole Trait Theory is joined in this endeavor by theories engaged in at least partially overlapping activities (Baumert & Schmitt, 2012; Bleidorn, 2009; Cramer et al., 2012; Denissen, van Aken, Penke, & Wood, 2013; DeYoung, this volume; Little & Joseph, 2007; Perunovic, Heller, Ross, & Komar, 2011; Read e…”
BackgroundInfluentialP-Technique Demonstrated in Determining Psychophysiological Source Traits in a Normal Individual
Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K. S., & Rhymer, R. M. (1947) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02288941 · Cited by 253
Advances in personality science.
Cervone, D., & Mischel, W. (2002) · Cited by 249
Judge, T. A., Simon, L., Hurst, C., & Kelley, K. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034485 · Cited by 238
Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1998) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1006/jrpe.1997.2206 · Cited by 200 · cited 1×
“Finally, factor analyses of these states have revealed structures similar to the Big 5 (Borkenau & Ostendorf, 1998).”
BackgroundA model for personality at three levels
Revelle, W., & Condon, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2014.12.006 · Cited by 166
Units of Analysis for the Description and Explanation of Personality
Johnson, J. A. (1997) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012134645-4/50004-4 · Cited by 162
The Dynamics of Personality States, Goals, and Well-Being
Heller, D. A., Komar, J. A., & Lee, W. B. (2007) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167207301010 · Cited by 159 · cited 3×
“Second, social-cognitive mechanisms were shown to predict the actual manifestation of traits, arguing that they are indeed at least part of the explanation of traits (Church et al., 2008; Clifton & Kuper, 2011; Fleeson, 2007; Heller et al., 2007; Judge et al., 2013; McCabe & Fleeson, 2012; McNiel, Lowman, & Fleeson, 2…”
BackgroundWho Does Well in Life? Conscientious Adults Excel in Both Objective and Subjective Success
Duckworth, A. L., Weir, D. R., Tsukayama, E., & Kwok, D. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00356 · Cited by 159
Noftle, E. E., & Fleeson, W. (2010) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0018199 · Cited by 152 · cited 1×
“…in affect, something that is commonly known to vary so much that it is hard to conceive of it as a trait; and (iii) more than the amount of variability between individuals, meaning that individuals differ from themselves more than they differ from others (Fleeson, 2001; Noftle & Fleeson, 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe person in psychology : selected essays
Āllport, G. W. (1968) · Beacon Press eBooks · Cited by 150
Personality and the leading behavioral contributors of mortality.
Turiano, N. A., Chapman, B. P., Gruenewald, T. L., & Mroczek, D. K. (2015) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000038 · Cited by 146
The effect of state extraversion on four types of affect
McNiel, J. M., Lowman, J., & Fleeson, W. (2009) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.738 · Cited by 145
Self-citationConceptions of Narcissism and the DSM-5 Pathological Personality Traits
Wright, A. G. C., Pincus, A. L., Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191113486692 · Cited by 129 · cited 1×
“…(Ashton & Lee, 2009; Costa & McCrae, 2006; DeYoung, Weisberg, Quilty, & Peterson, 2013; Goldberg, 1992; Johnson, 1997, Perugini & Gallucci, 1997; see also Wright et al., 2013), has made remarkable progress in identifying the content of broad traits and in providing evidence for their existence.”
BackgroundChurch, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Reyes, J. A. S., Salanga, M. G. C., Miramontes, L. A., & Adams, N. B. (2008) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.007 · Cited by 127 · cited 3×
“Second, social-cognitive mechanisms were shown to predict the actual manifestation of traits, arguing that they are indeed at least part of the explanation of traits (Church et al., 2008; Clifton & Kuper, 2011; Fleeson, 2007; Heller et al., 2007; Judge et al., 2013; McCabe & Fleeson, 2012; McNiel, Lowman, & Fleeson, 2…”
BackgroundIn favor of the synthetic resolution to the person–situation debate
Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. E. (2009) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.008 · Cited by 124 · cited 1×
“Although the trait approach would allow for some variability in behavior, it does not appear to allow the high degree of variable responding required in the social-cognitive approach (Allport, 1937; Fleeson & Noftle, 2009; Mischel, 1973).”
BackgroundSelf-citationChurch, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Ching, C. M., Zhang, H., Shen, J., Mazuera‐Arias, R., Rincon, B. C., Morio, H., Tanaka‐Matsumi, J., Takaoka, S., et al. (2013) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.002 · Cited by 124 · cited 5×
“Whole Trait Theory starts with the assertion that the descriptive side of traits is best thought of as density distributions of states (Baird, Le, & Lucas, 2006; Fleeson, 2001, 2012; Fleeson & Wilt, 2010; Judge, Simon, Hurst, & Kelley, 2013; Timothy Church et al., 2013).”
BackgroundInfluentialLinking personality states, current social roles and major life goals
Bleidorn, W. (2009) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.731 · Cited by 117 · cited 4×
“Fortunately, Whole Trait Theory is joined in this endeavor by theories engaged in at least partially overlapping activities (Baumert & Schmitt, 2012; Bleidorn, 2009; Cramer et al., 2012; Denissen, van Aken, Penke, & Wood, 2013; DeYoung, this volume; Little & Joseph, 2007; Perunovic, Heller, Ross, &…”
BackgroundInfluentialHartshorne, H., May, M. A., & Inquiry, C. E. (1930) · MacMillan Co eBooks · doi:10.1037/13386-000 · Cited by 114 · cited 3×
“(Hartshorne & May, 1928, p.385).”
BackgroundHuang, J. L. W., & Ryan, A. M. (2011) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01216.x · Cited by 109 · cited 2×
“…situational, work, cultural, motivational, and interpersonal processes involved in causing Big 5 personality states (Côté, Moskowitz, & Zuroff, 2012; Fleeson, 2007; Heller, Komar, & Lee, 2007; Huang & Ryan, 2011; Judge et al., 2013; McCabe & Fleeson, 2012; Read et al., 2010; Church et al., 2013).”
BackgroundFournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2009) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.01.023 · Cited by 109
Perspectives on the PersonRapid Growth and Opportunities for Integration
Fleeson, W. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398991.013.0003 · Cited by 87 · cited 11×
“Big 5 personality states are also predictable from the goals an individual is pursuing at the moment (Bleidorn, 2009; Heller et al., 2007; McCabe & Fleeson, 2012; Perunovic et al., 2011).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationCôté, S., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2011) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0025313 · Cited by 76 · cited 1×
“Big 5 personality states are predictable from features of the situation (Bleidorn, 2009; Church et al., 2008; Clifton & Kuper, 2011; Côté et al., 2012; Fleeson, 2007; Fournier, Moskowitz, & Zuroff, 2009; Huang & Ryan, 2011; Judge et al., 2013).”
BackgroundThe Key Ingredients of Personality Traits
Yu, Y., Read, S. J., Denson, T. F., Xu, Y., Jin, Z., & Pedersen, W. C. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167213505871 · Cited by 72
If the person–situation debate is really over, why does it still generate so much negative affect?
Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2009) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2009.02.009 · Cited by 65 · cited 2×
“Because of the person-situation debate, trait and social-cognitive theories have been largely at odds with each other (Fleeson, 2012; Funder, 2009; Hampson, 2012; Lucas & Donnellan, 2009).”
BackgroundKatainen, S., Räikkönen, K., & Keltikangas‐Järvinen, L. (1997) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-0984(199711)11:4 · Cited by 44
Shoda, Y., & LeeTiernan, S. (2002) · Cited by 41
Fleeson, W., & Jolley, S. (2015) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315805610.ch3 · Cited by 34 · cited 2×
“We propose that several processes, including social-cognitive ones described by (but not identical to) CAPS (Mischel & Shoda, 1995), are the determinants of states (Fleeson & Jolley, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationThe Role of Scripts in Personal Consistency and Individual Differences
Demorest, A. P., Popovska, A., & Dabova, M. (2011) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2011.00727.x · Cited by 33 · cited 1×
“For example, the script of “The unknown-fear” may lead to reduced extraversion behaviors (Demorest et al., 2012).”
BackgroundPersonal projects and free traits: Mutable selves and well beings.
Little, B. R., & Joseph, M. (2007) · doi:10.4324/9781315089928-14 · Cited by 32 · cited 1×
“…overlapping activities (Baumert & Schmitt, 2012; Bleidorn, 2009; Cramer et al., 2012; Denissen, van Aken, Penke, & Wood, 2013; DeYoung, this volume; Little & Joseph, 2007; Perunovic, Heller, Ross, & Komar, 2011; Read et al., 2010; Snow, 2009) Whole Trait Theory makes five primary points, as shown…”
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2006) · Cited by 31
Clifton, A. D., & Kuper, L. E. (2010) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00686.x · Cited by 30 · cited 2×
“…shown to predict the actual manifestation of traits, arguing that they are indeed at least part of the explanation of traits (Church et al., 2008; Clifton & Kuper, 2011; Fleeson, 2007; Heller et al., 2007; Judge et al., 2013; McCabe & Fleeson, 2012; McNiel, Lowman, & Fleeson, 2010; Read et al.,…”
BackgroundPersonality and Information Processing
Baumert, A., & Schmitt, M. (2012) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1850 · Cited by 29 · cited 1×
“Fortunately, Whole Trait Theory is joined in this endeavor by theories engaged in at least partially overlapping activities (Baumert & Schmitt, 2012; Bleidorn, 2009; Cramer et al., 2012; Denissen, van Aken, Penke, & Wood, 2013; DeYoung, this volume; Little & Joseph, 2007; Perunovic, Heller, Ross, &…”
BackgroundGerstorf, D., Siedlecki, K. L., Tucker–Drob, E. M., & Salthouse, T. A. (2009) · International Journal of Behavioral Development · doi:10.1177/0165025408098013 · Cited by 24
Perunovic, W. Q. E., Heller, D. A., Ross, M., & Komar, S. (2011) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550611405071 · Cited by 16 · cited 1×
“Big 5 personality states are also predictable from the goals an individual is pursuing at the moment (Bleidorn, 2009; Heller et al., 2007; McCabe & Fleeson, 2012; Perunovic et al., 2011).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1982). Analyzing the construction of consistency in personality. Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 233–262).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations
Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.03.001 · Cited by 1,080
“For example, although self-ratings of personality traits are moderately heritable (40–55% range; Bouchard & McGue, 2003), personality expression varies across contexts (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015) and trait levels of personality change over time (Roberts, Walton, & Viechtbauer, 2006).”
BackgroundDweck, C. S. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000082 · Cited by 683
A conceptual framework for the neurobiological study of resilience
Kalisch, R., Müller, M. B., & Tüscher, O. (2015) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1400082x · Cited by 669
Processes of Personality Development in Adulthood: The TESSERA Framework
Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316652279 · Cited by 559
“Personality trait change presumably comes about because repeated states get ingrained and become long-term, consistent patterns (Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2015; Magidson et al., 2014; Roberts, 2009; W. Wood & Neal, 2007), the processes are detailed in the section “Processes of Transferring Short-Term…”
BackgroundInfluentialPost–traumatic growth as positive personality change: Evidence, controversies and future directions
Jayawickreme, E., & Blackie, L. E. R. (2014) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.1963 · Cited by 555
“…regarding the existence and consistency of personality to more fundamental questions about the mechanisms underlying personality (Fleeson, 2012; Fleeson & Jayawickreme, 2014), research on how different types of adverse and traumatic life events affect personality can provide important insights…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fleeson, W., & Jayawickreme, E.
- Affiliations
- Wake Forest University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fleeson, William
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 56
- Pages
- 82-92
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4472377
- OpenAlex
- W2059608342
- Cited by
- 839
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2026: 80 · 2025: 93 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 108 · 2020: 132 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 46 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 13
- FWCI
- 40.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Templeton World Charity Foundation
- John Templeton Foundation
- National Institute of Mental Health of the National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Keywords
- Whole Trait Theory, personality traits, Big Five personality traits, trait models, trait structure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review