Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The role of individual differences in L2 writing

Open access
Kormos, Judit·2012·Journal of Second Language Writing
DOI 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Ackerman, 2003, Aptitude complexes and trait complexes, Educational Psychologist, 38, 85, 10.1207/S15326985EP3802_3 · DOI
  2. Adams, 2008, Working memory and writing in bilingual students, International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, 13, 10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034417 · DOI
  3. Anderson, 2005, Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness, Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 134, 258, 10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.258 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Andringa, 2011, The effect of explicit and implicit instruction on free written response task performance, Language Learning, 61, 868, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00623.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baddeley, 1974, Working memory, Vol. 8, 47
  6. Bitchener, 2012, A reflection on the language learning potential of written corrective feedback, Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 348, 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.006 · DOI
  7. Clément, 1983, Orientations in second language acquisition: I. The effects of ethnicity, milieu, and target language on their emergence, Language Learning, 33, 273, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1983.tb00542.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. Corno, 1993, The best-laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research, Educational Researcher, 22, 14, 10.3102/0013189X022002014 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Csizér, 2005, The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort, Modern Language Journal, 89, 19, 10.1111/j.0026-7902.2005.00263.x · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dörnyei, 2000, The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance, Language Teaching Research, 4, 275, 10.1177/136216880000400305 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Ehrman, 1995, Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success, Modern Language Journal, 79, 67, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05417.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gardner, 2006, The socio-educational model of second language acquisition: A research paradigm, EUROSLA Yearbook, 6, 237, 10.1075/eurosla.6.14gar · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gardner, 1959, Motivational variables in second language acquisition, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 13, 266, 10.1037/h0083787 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Gathercole, 1999, Cognitive approaches to the development of short-term memory, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 410, 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01388-1 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Grigorenko, 2001, Developmental dyslexia: An update on genes brains and environments, The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 91, 10.1111/1469-7610.00704 · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00704 · Paper page
  16. Grigorenko, 2000, A theory based approach to the measurement of foreign language learning ability: The Canal-F theory and test, Modern Language Journal, 84, 390, 10.1111/0026-7902.00076 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hayes, 2006, Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts?, Written Communication, 23, 135, 10.1177/0741088306286283 · DOI
  18. Hoskyn, 2003, The relationship between working memory and writing in younger and older adults, Reading and Writing, 16, 759, 10.1023/A:1027320226283 · DOI
  19. Kormos, 2008, Phonological short term-memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 261, 10.1017/S1366728908003416 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Kormos, 2012, The role of task complexity, modality and aptitude in narrative task performance, Language Learning, 62, 439, 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00695.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Mackey, A., & Sachs, R. (in press). Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback, and L2 development. Language Learning.
  22. Manchón, 2009, Individual differences in foreign language learning: The dynamics of beliefs about L2 writing, Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada, 22, 245
  23. Masgoret, 2003, Attitudes, motivation and second language learning: A meta-analysis of studies conducted by Gardner and associates, Language Learning, 53, 123, 10.1111/1467-9922.00212 · DOI · Paper page
  24. McCutchen, 1994, Individual differences in writing: Implications of translating fluency, Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 256, 10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.256 · DOI
  25. Mota Fortkamp, 2007, Relationship among individual differences in working memory capacity, noticing, and L2 speech production, Signo, 32, 42
  26. Noels, 2001, Intrinsic, extrinsic and integrative orientations of French Canadian learners of English, Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 424, 10.3138/cmlr.57.3.424 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Pajares, 2003, Self-efficacy beliefs motivation and achievement in writing: A review of the literature, Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 139, 10.1080/10573560308222 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Robinson, 1995, Attention, memory and the noticing hypothesis, Language Learning, 45, 283, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1995.tb00441.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. Robinson, 2001, Individual differences. Cognitive abilities aptitude complexes and learning conditions in second language acquisition, Second Language Research, 17, 368, 10.1191/026765801681495877 · doi:10.1191/026765801681495877
  30. Robinson, 2005, Aptitude and second language acquisition, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 45, 10.1017/S0267190505000036 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Seidlhofer, 2005, English as a lingua franca, ELT Journal, 59, 339, 10.1093/elt/cci064 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Sheen, 2007, The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles, TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255, 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00059.x · DOI · Paper page
  33. Snow, 1992, Aptitude theory: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow, Educational Psychologist, 27, 5, 10.1207/s15326985ep2701_3 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Swanson, 1996, Individual differences in children's writing: A function of working memory or reading or both processes?, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 8, 357, 10.1007/BF00395114 · DOI
  35. Wengelin, 2009, Combined eyetracking and keystroke-logging methods for studying cognitive processes in text production, Behavior Research Methods, 41, 337, 10.3758/BRM.41.2.337 · DOI
  36. Williams, 2012, The potential role(s) of writing in second language development, Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 321, 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.007 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Yashima, 2002, Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context, Modern Language Journal, 86, 54, 10.1111/1540-4781.00136 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Zimmerman, 2000, Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82, 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kormos, J.
Venue
Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-12
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
390-403
ISSN
1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jslw.2012.09.003
OpenAlex
W2045331832
Cited by
370
References
17
FWCI
122.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.