The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What changes, and for whom? A study of the impact of learning analytics-based process feedback in a large course
Open accessOverview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another promise of GenAI in supporting human learning is its potential to provide timely, specific, and constructive feedback, a key element of high-quality instruction and essential for effective learning [34][35][36].”
From Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“Studies [135,136] demonstrated how analyzing feedback data helped instructors pinpoint gaps in students' procedural skills.”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [135]
In the citing paper
“This identification led to more targeted interventions and improved learning outcomes, ensuring that students received the support they needed to address specific areas of difficulty.”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [135]
Citations
Cites
Discovering Statistics Using SPSS
Field, A. P., & Miles, J. N. V. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 28,269
(2002) · Cited by 13,211
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
Austin, P. C. (2011) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2011.568786 · Cited by 12,242
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065003245 · Cited by 3,334
Discovering statistics using R
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-2114 · Cited by 2,548
Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J. T., & Graesser, A. C. (1998) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410602350 · Cited by 2,138
Studying as Self-Regulated Learning
(1998) · Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice · doi:10.4324/9781410602350-19 · Cited by 1,589
Let’s not forget: Learning analytics are about learning
Gašević, D., Dawson, S., & Siemens, G. (2015) · TechTrends · doi:10.1007/s11528-014-0822-x · Cited by 1,049
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Promises and challenges of generative artificial intelligence for human learning
Yan, L., Greiff, S., Teuber, Z., & Gašević, D. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02004-5 · Cited by 499
Self-citationAutomatic feedback in online learning environments: A systematic literature review
Cavalcanti, A. P., Barbosa, A., Carvalho, R., Freitas, F., Tsai, Y.-S., Gašević, D., & Mello, R. F. (2021) · Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100027 · Cited by 440
Self-citationBanihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., van Ginkel, S., Macfadyen, L. P., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2022.100489 · Cited by 246
Molenaar, I., Mooij, S. D., Azevedo, R., Bannert, M., Järvelä, S., & Gašević, D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107540 · Cited by 217
Self-citationEffects of real-time analytics-based personalized scaffolds on students’ self-regulated learning
Lim, L., Bannert, M., van der Graaf, J., Singh, S., Fan, Y., Surendrannair, S., Rakovic, M., Molenaar, I., Moore, J., & Gašević, D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107547 · Cited by 198
“…by process analyses, as theorized by SRL models (e.g., Zimmerman, 2002), such as first analyzing the task, monitoring while performing various cognitive activities, and evaluating learning (Bannert, Reimann, & Sonnenberg, 2014; Lim et al., 2021; Paans, Molenaar, Segers, & Verhoeven, 2019).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationFidan, M., & Gencel, N. (2022) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331221077901 · Cited by 186
Maier, U., & Klotz, C. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100080 · Cited by 218
Heikkinen, S., Saqr, M., Malmberg, J., & Tedre, M. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11281-4 · Cited by 124
“In other cases, some researchers used focus groups (Balavijendran & Burnie, 2018; Lim et al., 2021; Lim et al., 2020), observations of facial expressions (Bouchet et al.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialYan, L., Martínez‐Maldonado, R., & Gašević, D. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3636555.3636856 · Cited by 175
“Similar opportunities may also apply to the illustration and presentation of LA. Prior LA research has demonstrated the benefits of data-driven personalised feedback in improving learners’ academic achievement [57, 75].”
BackgroundSelf-citationLiu, Z.-M., Hwang, G.-J., Chen, C.-Q., Chen, X.-D., & Ye, X.-D. (2026) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2024.2389923 · Cited by 115
“However, existing scaffolds often fail to adequately account for the dynamic nature of SRL processes, lacking adapt-ability and personalization (Lim et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2023).”
Kew, S. N., & Tasir, Z. (2021) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-021-09541-2 · Cited by 116
Yang, C. C. Y., & Ogata, H. (2022) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11291-2 · Cited by 98
“These findings are consistent with those reported by The findings relating to the provision of LA-based feedback are consistent with those reported by Lim et al. (2021); that is, using the LA-based feedback in a course that implemented the BL setting can improve students’ learning achievements.”
BackgroundResultLim, L.-A., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Pardo, A., Fudge, A., & Gentili, S. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1782831 · Cited by 113
“A key focus in learning analytics research is facilitating ‘ the provision of automated, scaled and real-time feedback to learners ’ (Pardo et al. 2019, 167).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationAnalytics of Learning Strategies: Role of Course Design and Delivery Modality
Matcha, W., Gašević, D., Uzir, N. A., Jovanović, J., Pardo, A., Lim, L.-A., Maldonado‐Mahauad, J., Gentili, S., Pérez‐Sanagustín, M., & Tsai, Y. (2020) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2020.72.3 · Cited by 87
“Previous studies showed that by customizing the feedback to suit the given learning situation, learners could be provided with help for improving their academic performance (Matcha, Gašević, Ahmad Uzir, Jovanović, & Pardo, 2019; Lim et al., 2019).”
BackgroundSelf-citationLearning analytics for online game-Based learning: a systematic literature review
Banihashem, S. K., Dehghanzadeh, H., Clark, D. B., Noroozi, O., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2023) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2023.2255301 · Cited by 98
“LA assists learners with adaptive learning by providing real-time feedback and re fl ections on the learning process (Lim et al. 2021).”
Gašević, D., Greiff, S., & Shaffer, D. W. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107304 · Cited by 82
“The use of learning analytics has also shown its potential to enhance both student retention (Arnold & Pistilli, 2012) and quality of feedback (Lim et al., 2021; Pardo, 2018), and to inform teaching practice (Martínez-Maldonado et al., 2022).”
BackgroundSelf-citationZheng, L., Niu, J., & Zhong, L. (2021) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13156 · Cited by 79
Student Opinions About Personalized Recommendation and Feedback Based on Learning Analytics
Yılmaz, F. G. K., & Yılmaz, R. (2020) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-020-09460-8 · Cited by 72
Students’ sense-making of personalised feedback based on learning analytics
Lim, L.-A., Dawson, S., Gašević, D., Joksimović, S., Fudge, A., Pardo, A., & Gentili, S. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.6370 · Cited by 66
“Most recent empirical studies have indicated that personalised, LA-based feedback yields observable, positive benefits for students’ SRL in terms of learning strategies and performance (Lim et al., 2019; Matcha et al., 2019), as well as time management (Ahmad Uzir et al., 2019).”
BackgroundSelf-citationCai, Z., Gui, Y., Mao, P., Wang, Z., Hao, X., Fan, X., & Tai, R. H. (2023) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100521 · Cited by 83
Buckingham Shum, S., Lim, L.-A., Boud, D., Bearman, M., & Dawson, P. (2023) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-023-00410-9 · Cited by 77
“Finally, there is emerging evidence that learners’ attributes have some influence on their feedback literacy, such as prior academic performance (Lim et al., 2021a), self-efficacy and baseline self-regulation (Tsai et al., 2021), or performance goals (Brown et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationAbdullah, S. I. N. W., Arokiyasamy, K., Goh, S. L., Culas, A. J., & Manaf, N. M. A. (2022) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-022-00197-8 · Cited by 51
Mejeh, M., Sarbach, L., & Hascher, T. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12510-8 · Cited by 93
“External feedback can assist learners in adapting, selecting as well as utilizing regulatory strategies, thereby stimulating internal feedback processes and enhancing SRL skills (Lim et al., 2021).”
BackgroundData frontiers and frontiers of power in (higher) education: a view of/from the Global South
Prinsloo, P. (2020) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1723537 · Cited by 50
Lim, L.-A., Gasevic, D., Matcha, W., Ahmad Uzir, N., & Dawson, S. (2021) · LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference · doi:10.1145/3448139.3448174 · Cited by 47
“To date, studies have found benefits of this novel approach to feedback on students’ satisfaction with feedback [25] and course performance [15, 25].”
BackgroundResultSelf-citationKnobbout, J., & van der Stappen, E. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2020.2999970 · Cited by 46
Bauer, E., Sailer, M., Niklas, F., Greiff, S., Sarbu‐Rothsching, S., Zottmann, J., Kiesewetter, J., Stadler, M. J., Fischer, M. R., Seidel, T., et al. (2025) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13123 · Cited by 63
Valle, N., Antonenko, P., do Valle, D. R., Dawson, K., Huggins‐Manley, A. C., & Baiser, B. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104288 · Cited by 51
Alalawi, K., Athauda, R., Chiong, R., & Renner, I. W. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12923-5 · Cited by 69
“…PSM attempts to remove bias by identifying control and treatment groups from the study cohort in such a way that students had a similar probability of being assigned to the control and treatment group based on a set of baseline characteristic variables (Lim et al., 2021 ; Mojarad et al., 2018 ).”
Analytics of learning strategies
Matcha, W., Gašević, D., Jovanović, J., Uzir, N. A., Oliver, C., Murray, A. D., & Gašević, D. (2020) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3375462.3375534 · Cited by 47
“on the choice of learning strategies [44, 21], student satisfaction with feedback [49], and academic performance have already been reported in the literature [35].”
BackgroundSelf-citationUrbina, S., Villatoro, S., & Salinas, J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13137281 · Cited by 43
Learning analytics in higher education – Stakeholders, strategy and scale
Gašević, D., Tsai, Y., & Drachsler, H. (2021) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100833 · Cited by 43
Self-citationStudent appreciation of data-driven feedback: A pilot study on OnTask
Tsai, Y.-S., Mello, R. F., Jovanović, J., & Gašević, D. (2021) · LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference · doi:10.1145/3448139.3448212 · Cited by 41
“So far, existing literature about OnTask has looked at student satisfaction [22], student experience through qualitative insights [16], and the association between feedback experience and learning outcomes [17].”
BackgroundEarly morning university classes are associated with impaired sleep and academic performance
Yeo, S. C., Lai, C. K., Tan, J., Lim, S., Chandramoghan, Y., Tan, T. K., & Gooley, J. J. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01531-x · Cited by 58
Mousavi, A., Schmidt, M., Squires, V., & Wilson, K. (2020) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-020-00210-6 · Cited by 43
“Lim and colleagues looked at the effect of OnTask ’ s personalized feedback administration on student self regulated learning and academic performance, finding positive effects of both provided by the intervention (Lim et al. 2019).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIraj, H., Fudge, A. L., Khan, H., Faulkner, M., Pardo, A., & Kovanović, V. (2021) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2021.7184 · Cited by 41
“…feedback systems opened new opportunities for providing feedback to students and have proved to be effective for engaging students (Dawson et al., 2018; Lim et al., 2019), boosting students’ satisfaction (Pardo et al., 2019), and improving outcomes (Dawson et al., 2018; Pardo et al., 2019).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationFormative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189
Lipnevich, A. A., Mattern, K., & Feddock, C. (2026) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2025.2569623 · Cited by 37
Understanding students' engagement with personalised feedback messages
Iraj, H., Fudge, A. L., Faulkner, M., Pardo, A., & Kovanović, V. (2020) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3375462.3375527 · Cited by 40
“This might be explained by the point that acting on feedback messages nudged students to engage early with the course and study regularly throughout the semester [41].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationChen, J. (2024) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2024.103388 · Cited by 33
Bauer, E., Richters, C., Pickal, A. J., Klippert, M., Sailer, M., & Stadler, M. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13609 · Cited by 33
Supporting actionable intelligence
Jovanović, J., Dawson, S., Joksimovíc, S., & Siemens, G. (2020) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3375462.3375474 · Cited by 31
“…to feedback provision at scale, such as those implemented in Student Relationship Engagement System, SRES [21] and the OnTask tool [29], allow course instructors to offer personalised process-oriented feedback to students [20], thus supporting students’ learning even in large-scale courses.”
MethodSelf-citationDart, S., & Spratt, B. (2020) · Student Success · doi:10.5204/ssj.1543 · Cited by 31
“One technology-based approach to student support is personalised emails, where analytical insights from online engagement and course performance are used to develop messages customised to individuals (Lim et al., 2019).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialCausal Inference and Bias in Learning Analytics
Weidlich, J., Gašević, D., & Drachsler, H. (2022) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2022.7577 · Cited by 27
“A widely used method of this approach is propensity score matching (Rosenbaum & Rubin, 1983; Austin, 2011), which has also been employed in the LA literature (Lim et al., 2021).”
MethodSelf-citationNicolay, B., Krieger, F., Stadler, M. J., Gobert, J. D., & Greiff, S. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106594 · Cited by 26
“Generally, such thorough investigations of performance-related data provide a deep insight into how students approach complex problems, and are frequently performed in the context of learning analytics (Kim, Yoon, Jo, & Branch, 2018; Lim et al., 2019; Nistor & Hernández-Garcíac, 2018).”
Analyzing the Efficacy of ECoach in Supporting Gateway Course Success Through Tailored Support
Matz, R. L., Schulz, K. W., Hanley, E., Derry, H. A., Hayward, B., Koester, B. P., Hayward, C., & McKay, T. A. (2021) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3448139.3448160 · Cited by 23
“Reflecting on the alignment (or lack thereof) between students’ intended performance, preparatory strategies, and actual exam performance is a key component of self-regulated learning behavior [7], which has been shown to help students process their learning and effort regulation [28] and specifically in similar intel…”
BackgroundWang, Y., Gao, C.-L., & Ye, X. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-12238-x · Cited by 22
“…methodologies, researchers could analyze and forecast students’ academic performance, and this in-depth analysis allows instructors or automated systems to craft learner-centric instruction tailored to individual needs (as evidenced by Lim et al., 2021; Şahin, 2023; Shabani & Eshaghian, 2014).”
Hu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101874 · Cited by 30
Hadwin, A. F. (2019) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101287 · Cited by 21
Feedback literacy matters: unlocking the potential of learning analytics-based feedback
Tepgeç, M., Heil, J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2367587 · Cited by 18
“…feedback systems, which provide richer data and more targeted insights for potentially more effective learning outcomes, strengthens the long-established significance of feedback in shaping the learning process (Pardo et al. 2019; Lim et al. 2021; Ifenthaler, Schumacher, and Kuzilek 2023).”
Scaffolding Feedback Literacy: Designing a Feedback Analytics Tool with Students
Jin, F. J.-Y., Maheshi, B., Martínez‐Maldonado, R., Gašević, D., & Tsai, Y. (2024) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2024.8339 · Cited by 18
“The themes of feedback characteristics (Ryan et al., 2023; Hattie & Timperley, 2007; Lim, Dawson, et al., 2021), agent characteristics (Jin et al., 2022), and learning design (Jin et al., 2022) were used to analyze additional causes of challenges perceived by students in the feedback process.”
Self-citationFeedback for student learning in higher education
Carless, D. R. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.14066-7 · Cited by 24
Lewis, S., Heath, G., Lim, L., & Roberts, R. (2021) · Student Success · doi:10.5204/ssj.1623 · Cited by 17
“These findings of different online activity patterns and increased academic performance provide further evidence of the impact of personalised feedback previously demonstrated by other researchers in this field (e.g., Lim et al., 2019; Pardo et al. 2017b).”
BackgroundSelf-citationQi, X., Sun, G., & Yue, L. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su151612562 · Cited by 17
“Align course features with Feedback message details [21].”
BackgroundMcCarthy, K. S., Crossley, S. A., Meyers, K., Boser, U., Allen, L. K., Chaudhri, V. K., Collins‐Thompson, K., D’Mello, S. K., Choudhury, M. D., Garg, K., et al. (2022) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000063 · Cited by 20
Liu, Y., Wang, W., & Xu, E. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251336707 · Cited by 27
Chen, A., Lian, J., Kuang, X., & Jia, J. (2025) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101054 · Cited by 18
Ceallaigh, T. J. Ó., O’ Brien, E., Tømte, C., Kulaksız, T., & Connolly, C. (2025) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2025.2563696 · Cited by 14
“It also offers timely, specific, and constructive feedback, an essential component of effective instruction (L. A. Lim et al. 2021; Pardo et al. 2019).”
A feedback model applied in a ubiquitous microlearning environment using SECA rules
Tabares, M. S., Vallejo, P., Montoya, A., & Correa, D. (2022) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-021-09306-x · Cited by 18
“According to Lim et al. (2019), “a challenge for contemporary educators is how to provide feedback to all students in large courses in a personalized, timely and instructive manner.””
BackgroundLearning Analytics in Higher Education
Stokes, J., & Fudge, A. L. (2023) · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199756810-0297 · Cited by 13
Brass, T., Kennedy, J., Gabriel, F. C., Neill, B., Devis, D., & Leonard, S. N. (2023) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2023.1173099 · Cited by 12
Dever, D. A., Wiedbusch, M. D., Romero, S. M., Smith, K., Patel, M., Sonnenfeld, N. A., Lester, J. C., & Azevedo, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1280566 · Cited by 11
Kia, F. S., Pardo, A., Dawson, S., & O'Brien, H. L. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2139351 · Cited by 11
“However, there are several studies that have provided such insight at the course level with very encouraging results, as shown by lim et al. (2021b). A further limitation of the study was that the tool was available for instructor use on a course-by-course basis, preventing us from examining the impact of its use at t…”
ResultSelf-citationTechnology-Enhanced Feedback System Usability in the Context of Self-Regulation Promotion
Žerovnik, A. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14090948 · Cited by 23
Jung, Y., & Wise, A. F. (2025) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105280 · Cited by 11
Yang, Y. P., & Song, Y. (2022) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-022-00251-x · Cited by 10
Content-Focused Formative Feedback Combining Achievement, Qualitative and Learning Analytics Data
Martínez, M. C., Serra, R., Sundaramoorthy, P., Booij, T. B. N., Vertegaal, C. J. C., Bounik, Z., Hastenberg, K. A. P. V., & Bentum, M. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13101014 · Cited by 10
“[35] explored the impact of LA-based automatic feedback on student self-regulation and performance in a large undergraduate course.”
BackgroundGenerating actionable predictions regarding MOOC learners’ engagement in peer reviews
Er, E., Gómez-Sánchez, E., Bote-Lorenzo, M., Dimitriadis, Y., & Asensio-Pérez, J. (2019) · Behavior and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2019.1669222 · Cited by 12
Quadir, B., Chang, M., & Yang, J. C. (2021) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100034 · Cited by 9
Merikko, J., Ng, K., Saqr, M., & Ihantola, P. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3207274 · Cited by 9
“Receiving personalized feedback with this approach has 73 been associated with a positive impact on student percep74 tion of feedback quality [10] and higher academic achieve75 ment [12].”
BackgroundPsathas, G., Tegos, S. D., Demetriadis, S., & Tsiatsos, Τ. (2023) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-023-09394-0 · Cited by 8
“According to Lim et al. (2019), individualized support based on LA leads to better learning outcomes.”
BackgroundTechnology-enhanced Learning and Learning Analytics for personalized STEM learning: A scoping review
Qushem, U. B., Christopoulos, A., Kaliisa, R., Khalil, M., Salakoski, T., & Laakso, M. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102827 · Cited by 16
Kyne, S. H., Lee, M. M. H., & Reyes, C. T. (2023) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d3rp00032j · Cited by 11
SECA: A Feedback Rules Model in a Ubiquitous Microlearning Context
Tabares, M. S., Vallejo, P., Montoya, A., Sanchez, J., & Correa, D. (2021) · International Conference on Data Science, E-Learning and Information Systems (DATA) · doi:10.1145/3460620.3460745 · Cited by 8
“[Lim et al. 2019], “a challenge for contemporary educators is how to provide feedback to all students in large courses in a personalised, timely and instructive manner.”
BackgroundPrediction of student performance in blended learning by utilizing learning analytics data
Ozerova, G. P., & Федоровна, П. Г. (2019) · Science for Education Today · doi:10.15293/2658-6762.1906.05 · Cited by 8
Establishing Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence in Automated FeedbackPreprint
Lin, J., Sha, L., Li, Y., Gašević, D., & Chen, G. (2022) · EdArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/5efxn · Cited by 10
Self-citationHu, Y.-H., Liao, B.-K., & Hsieh, C.-L. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2277741 · Cited by 11
“LADs serve as e ff ective learning sca ff olds for learners (Lim et al., 2021) and have been designed to support SRL (Matcha et al., 2020; Siemens & Long, 2011).”
Ma’arif, M. (2020) · JURNAL PAJAR (Pendidikan dan Pengajaran) · doi:10.33578/pjr.v4i1.7894 · Cited by 7
Halder, D., & Panda, S. (2026) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-025-00428-8 · Cited by 13
“Continuous feedback on readiness, self-efficacy, and persistence sustains autonomy and PL (Sáiz et al., 2020; Lim et al., 2021).”
A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Feedback Timing on Learning Outcomes in Computer-Assisted Learning
Kandemir, E. N., Esposito, E., Gurgand, L., & Ramus, F. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-026-10117-8 · Cited by 7
CEALLAIGH, T. Ó., & Murphy, S. (2026) · Computers and Education Open · doi:10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100367 · Cited by 10
Modelling the unique contributions of task understanding to academic challenges and performance
Olivares, L. M. B., Rostampour, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2024) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-024-09402-0 · Cited by 7
“Similarly, there may be value sampling these task-specific self-reports for multiple study episodes and coupling those with multi-modal traces of studying (Engelmann & Bannert, 2021; Greene, et al., 2021; Järvelä, et al., 2021; Lim, et al., 2021; Taub, et al., 2021).”
Tang, X., Jiang, L., Liu, G., & Li, H. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1610550 · Cited by 6
An Innovative Framework to Improve Course and Student Outcomes
Alalawi, K., Athauda, R., & Chiong, R. (2021) · International Conference on Innovative Technologies in Intelligent Systems and Industrial Applications (CITISIA) · doi:10.1109/citisia53721.2021.9719985 · Cited by 6
Wang, Z., Cao, Y., & Gong, S. (2022) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331221132079 · Cited by 6
InPath Forum: A Real-Time Learning Analytics and Performance Ranking Forum System
Yi, A. C. Y., Ying, T. K., Yee, S. J., Wee, M. C., & Tin, T. T. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3227430 · Cited by 6
“[14], [15].”
Zhang, L., Wu, M., & Ouyang, F. (2023) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-023-11940-0 · Cited by 6
“…students’ information and trace data, LA tools have been widely applied to help students make reflection, promote students to increase awareness of the learning process, and support instructors to provide learning guidance (Lim et al., 2019; Papamitsiou and Economides, 2015; Pardo et al., 2018).”
Powerful Student-Facing Dashboard Design Through Effective Feedback, Visualization, and Gamification
Bayrak, F., Kibar, P. N., & Kocadere, S. A. (2021) · Advances in analytics for learning and teaching · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81222-5_7 · Cited by 6
Lim, L.-A., Atif, A., & Farmer, I. W. (2022) · ASCILITE Publications · doi:10.14742/apubs.2022.55 · Cited by 6
“Emerging research in learning analytics feedback interventions has shown benefits for students’ self-regulated learning (Lim et al., 2020) and performance (Lim et al., 2021) in blended learning settings.”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationZhou, Q., Suraworachet, W., & Cukurova, M. (2021) · doi:10.35542/osf.io/u3g4n · Cited by 6
“Previous research has reinforced the usual higher predictive accuracy of models generated from multimodal compared to unimodal data [19-21] SRL research with MMLA has been introduced in many contexts such as individual distance learning [22-24] and collaborative learning [25-28].”
ResultInvestigating Student and Teacher Perceptions in e-Learning with Learning Analytics and Ontologies
Costa, L., da Silveira, A. C., Souza, M., Salvador, L. N., & Santos, C. A. S. (2023) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v18i08.32411 · Cited by 5
Human-centered Approaches to Data-informed Feedback
Tsai, Y., & Martínez‐Maldonado, R. (2022) · Solar eBooks · doi:10.18608/hla22.021 · Cited by 5
Fries, A., Pirotte, M., Vanhee, L., Bonnet, P., Quatresooz, P., Debruyne, C., Marée, R., & Defaweux, V. (2023) · Anatomical Sciences Education · doi:10.1002/ase.2346 · Cited by 5
“Learning analytics can produce and transmit information about students' progress as learners, enabling the teacher to regulate and improve existing pedagogical practices (Lim et al., 2021).”
BackgroundUsing Institutional Data to Drive Quality, Improvement, and Innovation
Dart, S., & Cunningham, S. (2023) · University development and administration · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-9438-8_29-1 · Cited by 5
Feedback Assisted by Technology: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research
Huang, W., Stephens, J. M., & Brown, G. (2025) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.1061 · Cited by 7
A meta-analysis on the effect of learning analytics interventions on students’ academic performance
Kokoç, M., Bütüner, S. Ö., & Güler, M. (2025) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2025.2536571 · Cited by 7
The paradigm wars rage: the need for an integrated approach for the future of higher education
Dollinger, M. (2023) · Advancing Scholarship and Research in Higher Education · doi:10.59197/asrhe.v4i1.8117 · Cited by 3
Sun, Y., Xu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · International Conference on Education Technology and Computer · doi:10.1145/3629296.3629307 · Cited by 4
Sauchelli, I. B., Heath, G., Richardson, A., Lewis, S., & Lim, L.-A. (2023) · Student Success · doi:10.5204/ssj.2825 · Cited by 4
“Lim et al. (2021) demonstrated positive changes in SRL when technology-mediated feedback was introduced into a large first-year course.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationPayne, A. L., Compton, M., & Kennedy, S. (2023) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-31875-7_7 · Cited by 4
Heikkinen, S., Saqr, M., Malmberg, J., & Tedre, M. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1738740/v1 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Lim, L.-A., Gentili, S., Pardo, A., Kovanović, V., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S.
- Affiliations
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Lim, Lisa-Angelique
- ORCID
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 72
- Pages
- 101202
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2945685654
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 52
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 18
- FWCI
- 17.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Office for Learning and Teaching
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- learning analytics, process feedback, student self-regulation, academic performance, personalized feedback, prior academic achievement, e-book usage
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review