Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 690

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Business Model: What It Is and What It Is Not

DaSilva, Carlos M., Trkman, Peter·2014·Long Range Planning
DOI 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.004

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Akkermans, 1995, Developing a logistics strategy through participative business modelling, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15, 100, 10.1108/01443579510102927 · doi:10.1108/01443579510102927
  2. Ambrosini, 2009, What are dynamic capabilities and are they a useful construct in strategic management?, International Journal of Management Reviews, 11, 29, 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2008.00251.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. Amit, 2001, Value creation in e-business, Strategic Management Journal, 22, 493, 10.1002/smj.187 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Andersen, 2010, Sense and sensibility: two approaches for using existing theory in theory-building qualitative research, Industrial Marketing Management, 39, 49, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2009.02.008 · DOI
  5. Barrett, 2004, How do the demands for airport services differ between full-service carriers and low-cost carriers?, Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, 33, 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2003.10.006 · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2003.10.006
  6. Bellman, 1957, On the construction of a multi-stage, multi-person business game, Operations Research, 5, 469, 10.1287/opre.5.4.469 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bunduchi, 2008, Trust, power and transaction costs in B2B exchanges – a socio-economic approach, Industrial Marketing Management, 37, 610, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.05.003 · DOI
  8. Cappelli, 2009, The future of the US business model and the rise of competitors, The Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 5, 10.5465/AMP.2009.39985536 · DOI
  9. Casadesus-Masanell, 2010, From strategy to business models and onto tactics, Long Range Planning, 43, 195, 10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Casadesus-Masanell, 2010, Strategies to fight Ad-sponsored rivals, Management Science, 56, 1484, 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1199 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Chesbrough, 2002, The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from xerox corporation's technology spin-off companies, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 529, 10.1093/icc/11.3.529 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Chesbrough, 2007, Business model innovation: it's not just about technology anymore, Strategy & Leadership, 35, 12, 10.1108/10878570710833714 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Cicchetti, 1973, Economic models and planning outdoor recreation, Operations Research, 21, 1104, 10.1287/opre.21.5.1104 · doi:10.1287/opre.21.5.1104
  14. Ciliberto, 2009, Market structure and multiple equilibria in airline markets, Econometrica, 77, 1791, 10.3982/ECTA5368 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Dave, 1998, Business modelling and simulation, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49, 180, 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600005 · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600005
  16. Faucher-King, 2008, The “modernization” of the labour party, 1994–2007: the successes and difficulties of importing the business model in politics, Politix, 21, 125, 10.3917/pox.081.0125 · doi:10.3917/pox.081.0125
  17. Garfield, 2011, The revolution will not be monetized, Spectrum, IEEE, 48, 34, 10.1109/MSPEC.2011.5779787 · doi:10.1109/mspec.2011.5779787
  18. George, 2011, The business model in practice and its implications for entrepreneurship research, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 83, 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00424.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ghaziani, 2005, Keywords and cultural change: frame analysis of business model public talk, 1975–2000, Sociological Forum, 20, 523, 10.1007/s11206-005-9057-0 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gilbert, 2003, Rebuilding big pharma's business model, In Vivo: The Business and Medicine Report, 21, 73
  21. Hansen, 1989, Determinants of firm performance: the relative importance of economic and organizational factors, Strategic Management Journal, 10, 399, 10.1002/smj.4250100502 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Johnson, 2008, Reinventing your business model, Harvard Business Review, 86, 50
  23. Jones, 1960, Educators, electrons, and business models: a problem in synthesis, Accounting Review, 35, 619
  24. Lawton, 2005, When being the lowest cost is not enough: Building a successful low-fare airline business model in Asia, Journal of Air Transport Management, 11, 355, 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.03.001 · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.03.001
  25. Lindman, 2007, Remarks on the quality of the construction of business concepts, European Business Review, 19, 196, 10.1108/09555340710746464 · DOI
  26. Magretta, 2002, Why business models matter, Harvard Business Review, 80, 86
  27. Mahadevan, 2000, Business models for Internet-based e-commerce: an anatomy, California Management Review, 42, 55, 10.2307/41166053 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Manafy, 2006, Time for a business-model remix? Music distribution in the wake of the Sony BMG DRM debacle, EContent-Digital Content Strategies and Resources, 29, 8
  29. McIvor, 2009, How the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm inform outsourcing evaluation, Journal of Operations Management, 27, 45, 10.1016/j.jom.2008.03.004 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Morris, 2005, The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective, Journal of Business Research, 58, 726, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.11.001 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Newhouse, 1970, Toward a theory of nonprofit institutions: an economic model of a hospital, The American Economic Review, 60, 64
  32. Njegovan, 2006, Elasticities of demand for leisure air travel: a system modelling approach, Journal of Air Transport Management, 12, 33, 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.09.003 · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2005.09.003
  33. Osterwalder, 2005, Clarifying business models: origins, present, and future of the concept, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 1
  34. Ouyang, 2009, From business process models to process-oriented software systems, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 19, 10.1145/1555392.1555395 · doi:10.1145/1555392.1555395
  35. Patel, 1997, The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much variety, Research Policy, 26, 141, 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00005-X · DOI · Paper page
  36. Pavlou, 2011, Understanding the elusive black box of dynamic capabilities, Decision Sciences, 42, 239, 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00287.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. Pavlovski, 2008, vol. 79, 103
  38. Ploesser, 2009, Learning from context to improve business processes, BPTrends, 6, 1
  39. Porter, 2001, Strategy and the Internet, Harvard Business Review, 79, 62
  40. Pynnonen, 2008, From business concept innovation to a business system: a case study of a virtual city portal, International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 2, 314, 10.1504/IJBIR.2008.017524 · doi:10.1504/ijbir.2008.017524
  41. Recker, 2009, Business process modeling – a comparative analysis, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 10, 333, 10.17705/1jais.00193 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Silverman, 1999, Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: Toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics, Management Science, 45, 1109, 10.1287/mnsc.45.8.1109 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Shafer, 2005, The power of business models, Business Horizons, 48, 199, 10.1016/j.bushor.2004.10.014 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Singh, 2006, Corporate governance, crony capitalism and economic crises: Should the US business model replace the Asian way of “doing business”?, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14, 220, 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00504.x · DOI
  45. Skerlavaj, 2007, Organizational learning culture – the missing link between business process change and organizational performance, International Journal of Production Economics, 106, 346, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.07.009 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Sovinc, 2009, Secovlje salina nature park, Slovenia – new business model for preservation of wetlands at risk, Global NEST. The International Journal, 11, 19
  47. Swatman, 2006, The changing digital content landscape: an evaluation of e-business model development in European online news and music, Internet Research, 16, 53, 10.1108/10662240610642541 · DOI
  48. Teece, 2010, Business models, business strategy and innovation, Long Range Planning, 43, 172, 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Thornton, 2003, Sorting through the dot bomb rubble: how did the high-profile e-tailers fail?, International Journal of Information Management, 23, 121, 10.1016/S0268-4012(02)00104-4 · DOI
  50. Tretheway, 2004, Distortions of airline revenues: why the network airline business model is broken, Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, 3, 10.1016/j.jairtraman.2003.10.010 · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2003.10.010
  51. Vardi, N., 2010. Al Qaeda's new business model. Forbes 185 (3), 60–66.
  52. Venkatraman, 1998, Real strategies for virtual organizing, Sloan Management Review, 40, 33
  53. Voelpel, 2005, Escaping the red queen effect in competitive strategy: sense-testing business models, European Management Journal, 23, 37, 10.1016/j.emj.2004.12.008 · DOI
  54. Wang, 2011, Supporting process design for e-business via an integrated process repository, Information Technology and Management, 12, 1, 10.1007/s10799-010-0076-z · doi:10.1007/s10799-010-0076-z
  55. Zott, 2010, Business model design: an activity system perspective, Long Range Planning, 43, 216, 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 690

Metadata

Authors
DaSilva, C. M., & Trkman, P.
Venue
Long Range Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
47
Issue
6
Pages
379-389
ISSN
0024-6301 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.004
OpenAlex
W3121193739
Cited by
690
References
8
FWCI
73.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BD/60200/2009)
  • Research Agency of Slovenia (J5—4012)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Business Model: What It Is and What It Is Not. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.004
The paper
DaSilva, C. M., & Trkman, P. (2014). Business Model: What It Is and What It Is Not. Long Range Planning. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.08.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.