Cited by 74Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesSleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Transcranial electrical stimulation during sleep enhances declarative (but not procedural) memory consolidation: Evidence from a meta-analysis

Barham, Michael P., Enticott, Peter G., Conduit, Russell, Lum, Jarrad A.G.·2016·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

This meta-analysis summarizes research examining whether transcranial electrical stimulation (transcranial direct current stimulation with oscillating and constant currents; transcranial alternating current stimulation), administered during sleep, can modulate declarative and procedural memory consolidation. Included in the meta-analysis were 13 experiments that represented data from 179 participants. Study findings were summarized using standardized mean difference (SMD) which is an effect size that summarizes differences in standard deviation units. Results showed electrical stimulation during sleep could enhance (SMD=0.447; p=.003) or disrupt (SMD=-0.476, p=.030) declarative memory consolidation. However, transcranial electric stimulation does not appear to be able to enhance (SMD=0.154, p=.279) or disrupt (SMD=0.076, p=.675) procedural memory consolidation. This meta-analysis provides strong evidence that TES is able to modulate some consolidation processes. Additional research is required to determine the mechanisms by which transcranial electrical stimulation is able to influence declarative memory consolidation. Finally, it is yet to be determined whether transcranial electrical stimulation can modulate procedural memory consolidation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.01.009

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barham, M. P., Enticott, P. G., Conduit, R., & Lum, J. A. G.
Affiliations
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lum, Jarrad A.G.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
63
Pages
65-77
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2289293589
Cited by
74
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
transcranial electrical stimulation, sleep, memory consolidation, declarative memory, procedural memory, transcranial direct current stimulation, transcranial alternating current stimulation, non-invasive brain stimulation
MeSH terms
Memory Consolidation, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Sleep, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review