Cited by 69Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Psychophysiological activity and reactivity in children and adolescents with conduct problems: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Open access
Fanti, Kostas A., Eisenbarth, Hedwig, Goble, Poppy, Demetriou, Chara, Kyranides, Melina Nicole, Goodwin, Daniel, Zhang, Junhua, Bobak, Billy +1 more·2019·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis to estimate the association between psychophysiological activity and reactivity at baseline or after a psychological task with conduct problems (CP) among children and adolescents. We systematically reviewed published studies reporting autonomic nervous system activity in youth with CP and meta-analyzed the relationship between CP and autonomic baseline as well as task-related reactivity in 66 studies (N = 10,227). Across 34 included case-control studies that were based on CP cut-off scores, we found a significant pooled effect for task related Skin-Conductance, Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia, and cardiac Pre-Ejection Period, but no significant group differences for Heart Rate nor for any baseline measures. Findings suggested reduced parasympathetic and sympathetic reactivity to emotional tasks, pointing to co-inhibition of the two systems. However, across 32 studies with correlational design we only found a significant negative correlation of baseline and task-related heart rate with CP. The present meta-analysis derived several conclusions that have the potential to inform biological vulnerability models and biologically driven interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.02.016

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fanti, K. A., Eisenbarth, H., Goble, P., Demetriou, C., Kyranides, M. N., Goodwin, D., Zhang, J., Bobak, B., & Cortese, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
  • Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
  • Yancheng Teachers University (CN)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Fanti, Kostas A.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-05
Volume
100
Pages
98-107
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2915715684
Cited by
69
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
conduct problems, psychophysiological reactivity, autonomic nervous system, skin conductance, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, pre-ejection period, heart rate, children and adolescents, biological vulnerability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Arousal, Autonomic Nervous System, Child, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychophysiology, Stress, Psychological, Conduct Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review