Cited by 494Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsExtracellular vesicles in diseaseNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Exosome reduction in vivo is associated with lower amyloid plaque load in the 5XFAD mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

Open access
Dinkins, Michael B., Dasgupta, Somsankar, Wang, Guanghu, Zhu, Gu, Bieberich, Erhard·2014·Neurobiology of Aging

Abstract

We present evidence here that exosomes stimulate aggregation of amyloid beta (Aβ)1-42 in vitro and in vivo and interfere with uptake of Aβ by primary cultured astrocytes and microglia in vitro. Exosome secretion is prevented by the inhibition of neutral sphingomyelinase 2 (nSMase2), a key regulatory enzyme generating ceramide from sphingomyelin, with GW4869. Using the 5XFAD mouse, we show that intraperitoneal injection of GW4869 reduces the levels of brain and serum exosomes, brain ceramide, and Aβ1-42 plaque load. Reduction of total Aβ1-42 as well as number of plaques in brain sections was significantly greater (40% reduction) in male than female mice. Our results suggest that GW4869 reduces amyloid plaque formation in vivo by preventing exosome secretion and identifies nSMase2 as a potential drug target in AD by interfering with exosome secretion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.02.012

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dinkins, M. B., Dasgupta, S., Wang, G., Zhu, G., & Bieberich, E.
Affiliations
Augusta University (US)
Corresponding author
Bieberich, Erhard
Venue
Neurobiology of Aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
1792-1800
ISSN
0197-4580 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991931811
Cited by
494
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 4
FWCI
17.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurobiology of Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01-AG034389)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
exosomes, amyloid-beta 42, amyloid plaques, Alzheimer's disease, 5xFAD mice, neutral sphingomyelinase 2, GW4869, ceramide, exosome secretion, astrocytes, microglia, sex differences
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Aniline Compounds, Animals, Astrocytes, Benzylidene Compounds, Brain, Cells, Cultured, Ceramides, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Peptide Fragments, Sphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Microglia, Exosomes, Plaque, Amyloid, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Protein Aggregation, Pathological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review