Cited by 89Motor Control and AdaptationNeurological disorders and treatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Distinct striatal regions for planning and executing novel and automated movement sequences

JANKOWSKI, J, SCHEEF, L, HUPPE, C, BOECKER, H·2009·NeuroImage

Abstract

The basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical circuits are viewed as segregated parallel feed back loops crucially involved in motor control, cognition, and emotional processing. Their role in planning novel, as compared to overlearned movement patterns is as yet not well defined. We tested for the involvement of the associative striatum (caudate/anterior putamen) in the generation of novel movement patterns, which is a critical cognitive requirement for non-routine motor behavior. Using event related functional MRI in 14 right-handed male subjects, we analyzed brain activity in the planning phase of four digit finger sequences. Subjects either executed a single overlearned four digit sequence (RECALL), or self-determined four digit sequences of varying order (GENERATE). In both conditions, RECALL and GENERATE, planning was associated with activation in mesial/lateral premotor cortices, motor cingulate cortex, superior parietal cortex, basal ganglia, insula, thalamus, and midbrain nuclei. When contrasting the planning phase of GENERATE with the planning phase of RECALL, there was significantly higher activation within this distributed network. At the level of the basal ganglia, the planning phase of GENERATE was associated with differentially higher activation located specifically within the associative striatum bilaterally. On the other hand, the execution phase during both conditions was associated with a shift of activity towards the posterior part of the putamen. Our data show the specific involvement of the associative striatum during the planning of non-routine movement patterns and illustrate the propagation of activity from rostral to dorsal basal ganglia sites during different stages of motor processing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.10.059

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JANKOWSKI, J., SCHEEF, L., HUPPE, C., & BOECKER, H.
Affiliations
University of Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
JANKOWSKI, J
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02-15
Volume
44
Issue
4
Pages
1369-1379
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972524658
Cited by
89
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of South Carolina
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
associative striatum, caudate nucleus, anterior putamen, basal ganglia, thalamocortical circuits, motor execution, premotor cortex
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Corpus Striatum, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Skills, Movement, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review