Cited by 71Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsPharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects

Neuroinflammation in healthy aging: A PET study using a novel Translocator Protein 18kDa (TSPO) radioligand, [18F]-FEPPA

Open access
Suridjan, I., Rusjan, P.M., Voineskos, A.N., Selvanathan, T., Setiawan, E., Strafella, A.P., Wilson, A.A., Meyer, J.H. +2 more·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

One of the cellular markers of neuroinflammation is increased microglia activation, characterized by overexpression of mitochondrial 18kDa Translocator Protein (TSPO). TSPO expression can be quantified in-vivo using the positron emission tomography (PET) radioligand [(18)F]-FEPPA. This study examined microglial activation as measured with [(18)F]-FEPPA PET across the adult lifespan in a group of healthy volunteers. We performed genotyping for the rs6971 TS.PO gene polymorphism to control for the known variability in binding affinity. Thirty-three healthy volunteers (age range: 19-82years; 22 high affinity binders (HAB), 11 mixed affinity binders (MAB)) underwent [(18)F]-FEPPA PET scans, acquired on the High Resolution Research Tomograph (HRRT) and analyzed using a 2-tissue compartment model. Regression analyses were performed to examine the effect of age adjusting for genetic status on [(18)F]-FEPPA total distribution volumes (VT) in the hippocampus, temporal, and prefrontal cortex. We found no significant effect of age on [(18)F]-FEPPA VT (F (1,30)=0.918; p=0.346), and a significant effect of genetic polymorphism (F (1,30)=8.767; p=0.006). This is the first in-vivo study to evaluate age-related changes in TSPO binding, using the new generation TSPO radioligands. Increased neuroinflammation, as measured with [(18)F]-FEPPA PET was not associated with normal aging, suggesting that healthy elderly individuals may serve as useful benchmark against patients with neurodegenerative disorders where neuroinflammation may be present.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.021

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some PET studies have shown increased TSPO ligand-binding activity in the brains of older adults, while other studies did not.

    “Although some PET studies have shown increased TSPO ligand-binding activity in the brains of older adults, other studies did not (Suridjan et al, 2014).”

    From Microglia Priming with Aging and Stress (2017) · cites this paper as Suridjan et al, 2014

  • Discrepancies in TSPO PET findings have been attributed to difference in ligand types, off-target binding, uneven distribution of the radioactive ligand in the brain parenchyma, and tissue-dependent differences in ligand affinity.

    “These discrepancies have been attributed to the difference in ligand types, off-target binding (such as the vascular endothelial cells), uneven distribution of the radioactive ligand in the brain parenchyma, and tissue-dependent differences in ligand affinity (Suridjan et al, 2014;Turkheimer et al, 2015).”

    From Microglia Priming with Aging and Stress (2017) · cites this paper as Suridjan et al, 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suridjan, I., Rusjan, P. M., Voineskos, A. N., Selvanathan, T., Setiawan, E., Strafella, A. P., Wilson, A. A., Meyer, J. H., Houle, S., & Mizrahi, R.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Mizrahi, R.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
84
Pages
868-875
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028274953
Cited by
71
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 6
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Scottish Grant Charitable Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects
Keywords
neuroinflammation, healthy aging, microglial activation, TSPO, [18F]FEPPA, PET radiotracer, binding affinity, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, temporal cortex, volume of distribution, healthy older adults
MeSH terms
Aging, Anilides, Brain, Female, Fluorine Radioisotopes, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Inflammation, Male, Middle Aged, Pyridines, Microglia, Receptors, GABA, Radiopharmaceuticals, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review