Cited by 508Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Spurious group differences due to head motion in a diffusion MRI study

Open access
Yendiki, Anastasia, Koldewyn, Kami, Kakunoori, Sita, Kanwisher, Nancy, Fischl, Bruce·2014·NeuroImage

Abstract

Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) has become a popular imaging modality for probing the microstructural properties of white matter and comparing them between populations in vivo. However, the contrast in DW-MRI arises from the microscopic random motion of water molecules in brain tissues, which makes it particularly sensitive to macroscopic head motion. Although this has been known since the introduction of DW-MRI, most studies that use this modality for group comparisons do not report measures of head motion for each group and rely on registration-based correction methods that cannot eliminate the full effects of head motion on the DW-MRI contrast. In this work we use data from children with autism and typically developing children to investigate the effects of head motion on differences in anisotropy and diffusivity measures between groups. We show that group differences in head motion can induce group differences in DW-MRI measures, and that this is the case even when comparing groups that include control subjects only, where no anisotropy or diffusivity differences are expected. We also show that such effects can be more prominent in some white-matter pathways than others, and that they can be ameliorated by including motion as a nuisance regressor in the analyses. Our results demonstrate the importance of taking head motion into account in any population study where one group might exhibit more head motion than the other.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.027

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bhat H Tisdall MD van der Kouwe AJW Feiweier T Heberlein K Epi navigator based prospective motion correction technique for diffusion neuroimaging Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med 2012 20 113
  2. Joelle E Sarlls Philip Shaw Adleman NE Rooopchansingh V Straightforward Method to Improve Sensitivity in Diffusion Imaging Studies of Subjects Who Move Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med 2012 20 3551

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yendiki, A., Koldewyn, K., Kakunoori, S., Kanwisher, N., & Fischl, B.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Yendiki, Anastasia
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
88
Pages
79-90
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053465090
Cited by
508
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 31
FWCI
35.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PMC
Funders
  • The Autism & Dyslexia Project
  • Ellison Medical Foundation
  • National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (K99/R00-EB008129, R01-EB006758)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P41-RR14075, U24-RR021382)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG022381, 5R01-AG008122-22)
  • National Center for Alternative Medicine (RC1-AT005728-01)
  • National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01-NS052585-01, 1R21-NS072652-01, 1R01-NS070963)
  • Shared Instrumentation Grants (1S10RR023401, 1S10RR019307, 1S10RR023043)
  • National Institutes of Health Blueprint for Neuroscience Research (5U01-MH093765)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
head movement, diffusion-weighted imaging, white matter microstructure, fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, autism spectrum disorder, children, motion correction, white matter tracts
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Head, Humans, Motion, Artifacts, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review