Cited by 335Functional Brain Connectivity StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: A publicly available resource for the study of normal and abnormal brain development in youth

Open access

Abstract

The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (PNC) is a large-scale study of child development that combines neuroimaging, diverse clinical and cognitive phenotypes, and genomics. Data from this rich resource is now publicly available through the Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP). Here we focus on the data from the PNC that is available through dbGaP and describe how users can access this data, which is evolving to be a significant resource for the broader neuroscience community for studies of normal and abnormal neurodevelopment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.03.056

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 44 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Satterthwaite, T. D., Connolly, J. J., Ruparel, K., Calkins, M. E., Jackson, C., Elliott, M. A., Roalf, D. R., Hopson, R., Prabhakaran, K., Behr, M., Qiu, H., Mentch, F. D., Chiavacci, R., Sleiman, P. M. A., Gur, R. C., Hakonarson, H., & Gur, R. E.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Satterthwaite, Theodore D.
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
124
Issue
Pt B
Pages
1115-1119
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030561475
Cited by
335
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 11
FWCI
14.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH089983, MH089924, MH019112, U01HG006830, K23MH098130, K01MH102609, K08MH79364)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort, brain development, child development, neuroimaging, genomics, clinical phenotype, cognitive phenotypes, public data, dbGaP, data access
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain, Child, Child Development, Developmental Disabilities, Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Nervous System, Internet, Genomics, Information Dissemination, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review