Cited by 694Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and PhilosophyPersonal Information Management and User Behavior

The “online brain”: How the Internet may be changing our cognition

Open access
Firth, Joseph, Torous, John, Stubbs, Brendon, Firth, Josh A., Steiner, Genevieve Z., Smith, Lee, Alvarez‐Jimenez, Mario, Gleeson, John +3 more·2019·World Psychiatry

Abstract

The impact of the Internet across multiple aspects of modern society is clear. However, the influence that it may have on our brain structure and functioning remains a central topic of investigation. Here we draw on recent psychological, psychiatric and neuroimaging findings to examine several key hypotheses on how the Internet may be changing our cognition. Specifically, we explore how unique features of the online world may be influencing: a) attentional capacities, as the constantly evolving stream of online information encourages our divided attention across multiple media sources, at the expense of sustained concentration; b) memory processes, as this vast and ubiquitous source of online information begins to shift the way we retrieve, store, and even value knowledge; and c) social cognition, as the ability for online social settings to resemble and evoke real‐world social processes creates a new interplay between the Internet and our social lives, including our self‐concepts and self‐esteem. Overall, the available evidence indicates that the Internet can produce both acute and sustained alterations in each of these areas of cognition, which may be reflected in changes in the brain. However, an emerging priority for future research is to determine the effects of extensive online media usage on cognitive development in youth, and examine how this may differ from cognitive outcomes and brain impact of uses of Internet in the elderly. We conclude by proposing how Internet research could be integrated into broader research settings to study how this unprecedented new facet of society can affect our cognition and the brain across the life course.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/wps.20617

Cites

136 of 136 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Students who exceed 2 hours of daily social media screen time tend to perform worse on cognitive assessments than those with restricted screen time.

    “Moreover, students who exceed 2 hours of daily screen time on social media tend to exhibit poorer performance on cognitive assessments in comparison to those with restricted screen time (Firth, Torous, Stubbs, Steiner, Smith,2019).”

    From SCROLLING AND SUSTAINED ATTENTION: HOW SOCIAL MEDIA INFLUENCE SUSTAINED ATTENTION OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS (2024) · cites this paper as Firth, Torous, Stubbs, Steiner, Smith,2019

    In “Cognitive consequences of the attention-grabbing Internet” (page not provided), the paper reports poorer performance on some cognitive tasks among frequent media multitaskers. It does not establish the claimed comparison between students spending more than two hours a day on social media and students with restricted screen time; its social-media discussion concerns mental health rather than cognitive assessments. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The study's findings are consistent with previous research indicating that excessive reliance on AI tools can negatively impact critical thinking skills.

    “Our findings are consistent with previous research indicating that excessive reliance on AI tools can negatively impact critical thinking skills.”

    From AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking (2025) · cites this paper as Firth et al. [24]

    In “How does a supernormal stimulus interact with normal cognition?” (page unavailable), the paper reports that less analytical thinkers used smartphones more for online information searches and discusses possible cognitive miserliness. It also suggests reliance on online searching may impede memory retrieval. These passages concern Internet use, not AI tools, and do not show that reliance on AI harms critical-thinking skills. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Children who used digital tools for more than 2 hours per day had lower scores on cognitive tests than those who used them less.

    “Children who used digital tools for more than 2 h per day had lower scores on cognitive tests than those who used them less (Firth et al., 2019).”

    From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Firth et al., 2019

    The Conclusions and Directions section (page unavailable) reports that more frequent Internet use over three years in children was linked to lower verbal intelligence at follow-up. It does not report a comparison of children using digital tools for more than two hours per day with those using them less, or cognitive-test scores for those groups. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Social isolation is associated with poor health outcomes and increased mortality.

    “Paradoxically, social media use is linked to social isolation (ie, a lack of social connections and quality relationships with others),21 which is associated with poor health outcomes and increased mortality.1”

    From Brain health consequences of digital technology use (2020) · cites this paper as [1]

  • Society has transitioned from the information age to the age of interruption.

    “We have indeed transitioned now from the information age to the age of interruption (Firth et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. [5]5. Osterhout L, Poliakov A, Inoue K et al. Secondlanguage learning and changes in the brain. J Neurolinguistics 2008;21:50921.
  2. [8]8. Gindrat AD, Chytiris M, Balerna M et al. Usedependent cortical process ing from fingertips in touchscreen phone users. Curr Biol 2015;25:109 16.
  3. [10]10. Levy R. Agingassociated cognitive decline. Int Psychogeriatr 1994;6:638.
  4. [31]31. Loh KK, Kanai R. Higher media multitasking activity is associated with smaller graymatter density in the anterior cingulate cortex. PLoS One 2014;9:e106698.
  5. [45]45. Wegner DM, Ward AF. The internet has become the external hard drive for our memories. Sci Am 2013;309:5861.
  6. [51]51. Dong G, Potenza MN. Shortterm Internetsearch practicing modulates brain activity during recollection. Neuroscience 2016;335:8290.
  7. [52]52. Dong G, Li H, Potenza MN. Shortterm internetsearch training is associ ated with increased fractional anisotropy in the superior longitudinal fas ciculus in the parietal lobe. Front Neurosci 2017;11:372.
  8. [65]65. HoltLunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a metaanalytic review. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000316.
  9. [70]70. Sunstein CR. # Republic. Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.
  10. [78]78. Sperling RA, Bates JF, Cocchiarella AJ et al. Encoding novel facename as sociations: a functional MRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 2001;14:12939.
  11. [102]102. Watts DJ. A twentyfirst century science. Nature 2007;445:489.
  12. [110]110. Lin LY, Sidani JE, Shensa A et al. Association between social media use and depression among US young adults. Depress Anxiety 2016;33:323 31.
  13. [119]119. Gleeson JF, Cotton SM, AlvarezJimenez M et al. A randomized controlled trial of relapse prevention therapy for firstepisode psychosis patients: outcome at 30month followup. Schizophr Bull 2013;39:43648.
  14. [122]122. AlvarezJimenez M, AlcazarCorcoles MA, GonzalezBlanch C et al. On line, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: a system atic review on novel userled interventions. Schizophr Res 2014; 156:96106.
  15. [123]123. AlvarezJimenez M, Bendall S, Lederman R et al. On the HORYZON: mod erated online social therapy for longterm recovery in first episode psy chosis. Schizophr Res 2013;143:1439.
  16. [129]129. Bhugra D, Tasman A, Pathare S et al. The WPALancet Psychiatry commis sion on the future of psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry 2017;4:775818.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Firth, J., Torous, J., Stubbs, B., Firth, J. A., Steiner, G. Z., Smith, L., Alvarez‐Jimenez, M., Gleeson, J., Vancampfort, D., Armitage, C. J., & Sarris, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • Anglia Ruskin University (GB)
  • Centre for Youth Mental Health University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB)
Venue
World Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-05-06
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
119-129
ISSN
  • 1723-8617 (ISSN-L)
  • 2051-5545
OpenAlex
W2944285188
Cited by
694
References
135
Citations by year
2026: 136 · 2025: 100 · 2024: 98 · 2023: 145 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 16
FWCI
108.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • World Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Anglia Ruskin Research Online (Anglia Ruskin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (APP1125000, ICA-CL-2017-03-001, NIHR-INF-0685)
  • NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre
  • Patient Safety Translational Research Centre
  • Manchester Biomedical Research Centre
  • Medical Research Council
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S009752/1)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1102532, 1125000, 1082934)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
Keywords
internet use, cognitive change, attention, divided attention, sustained attention, memory, online information, social cognition, self-concept, self-esteem, online social interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review