Cited by 285Genetic Associations and EpidemiologySchizophrenia research and treatmentGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The Psychiatric GWAS Consortium: Big Science Comes to Psychiatry

Open access
Sullivan, Patrick F.·2010·Neuron

Abstract

The Psychiatric GWAS Consortium was founded with the aim of conducting statistically rigorous and comprehensive GWAS meta-analyses for five major psychiatric disorders: ADHD, autism, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia. In the era of GWAS and high-throughput genomics, a major trend has been the emergence of collaborative, consortia approaches. Taking advantage of the scale that collaborative consortia approaches can bring to a problem, the PGC has been a major driver in psychiatric genetics and provides a model for how similar approaches may be applied to other disease communities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.10.003

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sullivan, P. F.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Sullivan, Patrick F.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
68
Issue
2
Pages
182-186
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079849867
Cited by
285
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 20
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • START, Global Change System for Analysis, Research, and Training
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH077139, U01MH085520, MH085520)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
psychiatric genetics, genome-wide association study, meta-analysis, big science, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, autism spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Neurobiology, Psychiatry, Meta-Analysis as Topic, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review