Cited by 287Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Neural Perspectives on Cognitive Control Development during Childhood and Adolescence

Open access
Crone, Eveline A., Steinbeis, Nikolaus·2017·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Since the discovery that patients with damage to the prefrontal cortex (PFC) show similar deficits in cognitive control as young children, the PFC model of cognitive control development has been a popular description of how cognitive control emerges over time. In this review, we show that not only do many studies support this model, but also that more specific models of PFC development can be formulated, according to the functional roles of subregions and by taking into account the distinctions within ventral-dorsal and lateral-medial PFC. We also reveal that the functional development of dorsolateral PFC supports the development of deliberative processes, whereas that of the medial PFC supports the development of internalized decisions. These new conceptualizations may provide better descriptions of the complexity of cognitive control development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.003

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognitive skills such as planning, future thinking, inhibiting inappropriate behaviour, emotion regulation, decision making, and particular forms of memory continue to improve during adolescence.

    “At the same time, cognitive skills such as planning, future thinking, inhibiting inappropriate behaviour, emotion regulation, decision making, and particular forms of memory continue to improve during adolescence (figure 2). 144-149”

    From The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024) · cites this paper as [146]

    The ‘A hierarchical representation (basic to complex) of cognitive control’ section reports improvements in working memory, emotion regulation, and delay discounting through adolescence. It also says response inhibition shows no large additional improvement during adolescence. The cited passages do not establish the claimed adolescent improvement in planning or future thinking. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Stuss, D.T. and B. Levine, Adults clinical neuropsychology: lessons from studies of the frontal lobes. Annual Review of Psychology, 2002. 53: p. 401-433.
  2. Dempster, F.N., The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: towards a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 1992. 12(1): p. 45-75.
  3. van Noordt, S.J. and S.J. Segalowitz, Performance monitoring and the medial prefrontal cortex: a review of individual differences and context effects as a window on self-regulation. Front Hum Neurosci, 2012. 6: p. 197.
  4. Achterberg, M., et al., Fronto-striatal white matter integrity predicts development in delay of gratification: a longitudinal study. Journal of Neuroscience, 2016. 36(6): p. 1954-1961.
  5. Peters, S., et al., Predicting reading and mathematics from neural activity for feedback learning. . Developmental Psychology, in press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crone, E. A., & Steinbeis, N.
Affiliations
Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Crone, Eveline A.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
205-215
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2584294616
Cited by
287
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 7
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (14-001, 453-14-011, 45314001, VICI 453‐14‐001, NWO?VICI 453-14-001)
  • Jacobs Foundation
  • H2020 European Research Council (681632, 715282)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
prefrontal cortex, childhood, adolescence, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, deliberative processes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cognition, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review