Cited by 552Experimental Behavioral Economics StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSocial Power and Status Dynamics

The Sunny Side of Fairness: Preference for Fairness Activates Reward Circuitry (and Disregarding Unfairness Activates Self-Control Circuitry)

Tabibnia, Golnaz, Satpute, Ajay B., Lieberman, Matthew D.·2008·Psychological Science

Abstract

Little is known about the positive emotional impact of fairness or the process of resolving conflict between fairness and financial interests. In past research, fairness has covaried with monetary payoff, such that the mental processes underlying preference for fairness and those underlying preference for greater monetary outcome could not be distinguished. We examined self-reported happiness and neural responses to fair and unfair offers while controlling for monetary payoff. Compared with unfair offers of equal monetary value, fair offers led to higher happiness ratings and activation in several reward regions of the brain. Furthermore, the tendency to accept unfair proposals was associated with increased activity in right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, a region involved in emotion regulation, and with decreased activity in the anterior insula, which has been implicated in negative affect. This work provides evidence that fairness is hedonically valued and that tolerating unfair treatment for material gain involves a pattern of activation resembling suppression of negative affect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02091.x

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first player experiences increased positive emotion and ventral striatum and medial prefrontal cortex activity when receiving fair offers from the second player, independently of the material outcome.

    “Research shows that the first player experiences increased positive emotion and ventral striatum and medial prefrontal cortex activity when receiving fair offers from the second player, independently of the material outcome 93.”
  • Striatum responses reflect the positive value of fair outcomes.

    “Whereas increased responses in insular cortex have been associated with perceived unfairness of monetary outcomes 91, a growing literature suggests that striatum responses reflect the positive value of fair outcomes 73, 92, 93.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tabibnia, G., Satpute, A. B., & Lieberman, M. D.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2008-04
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
339-347
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2110617775
Cited by
552
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 32
FWCI
94.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
fairness, happiness, monetary rewards, reward processing, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior insula, emotion regulation, negative affect, social decision-making
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Cerebral Cortex, Conflict, Psychological, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Reward, Social Control, Informal, Social Justice, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review