Cited by 41Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Controlling one’s world: Identification of sub-regions of primate PFC underlying goal-directed behavior

Open access
Duan, Lisa Y., Horst, Nicole K., Cranmore, Stacey A.W., Horiguchi, Naotaka, Cardinal, Rudolf N., Roberts, Angela C., Robbins, Trevor W.·2021·Neuron

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Impaired detection of causal relationships between actions and their outcomes can lead to maladaptive behavior. However, causal roles of specific prefrontal cortex (PFC) sub-regions and the caudate nucleus in mediating such relationships in primates are unclear. We inactivated and overactivated five PFC sub-regions, reversibly and pharmacologically: areas 24 (perigenual anterior cingulate cortex), 32 (medial PFC), 11 (anterior orbitofrontal cortex, OFC), 14 (rostral ventromedial PFC/medial OFC), and 14-25 (caudal ventromedial PFC) and the anteromedial caudate to examine their role in expressing learned action-outcome contingencies using a contingency degradation paradigm in marmoset monkeys. Area 24 or caudate inactivation impaired the response to contingency change, while area 11 inactivation enhanced it, and inactivation of areas 14, 32, or 14-25 had no effect. Overactivation of areas 11 and 24 impaired this response. These findings demonstrate the distinct roles of PFC sub-regions in goal-directed behavior and illuminate the candidate neurobehavioral substrates of psychiatric disorders, including obsessive-compulsive disorder.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.003

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OFC's functional significance in goal-directed decision-making has been controversial; both activation and inhibition of OFC disrupt flexibility of behavior and shift it to habitual.

    “In contrast to the ACC, although a number of studies implicate the OFC in reward-related decision-making, its functional significance in goal-directed decision-making has been controversial; both activation and inhibition of the OFC disrupt flexibility of a behavior and shift it to a habitual one5,44.”

    From Dissociable roles of prefrontal plasticity in decision-making strategy and execution of habitual behavior (2026) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results section reports that overactivation of anterior OFC (area 11) blunted sensitivity to action–outcome contingency degradation, but inactivation enhanced it rather than disrupting it. The Discussion’s Implications section also cautions that persistent responding during degradation is not necessarily habitual control, so the claimed shift to habit is not established. Page numbers were not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 124 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Cochran W.G. Cox G.M. Experimental Designs Second Edition 1957 John Wiley & Sons 31

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duan, L. Y., Horst, N. K., Cranmore, S. A. W., Horiguchi, N., Cardinal, R. N., Roberts, A. C., & Robbins, T. W.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Duan, Lisa Y.
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-08
Volume
109
Issue
15
Pages
2485-2498.e5
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3176985371
Cited by
41
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (106431/Z/14/Z, 104631/Z/14/Z)
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
goal-directed behavior, action-outcome contingency, contingency degradation, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, caudate nucleus, marmoset monkey, neural inactivation, obsessive-compulsive disorder, mental illness
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Callithrix, Goals, Learning, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review