Cited by 532Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

What the orbitofrontal cortex does not do

Open access
Stalnaker, Thomas A, Cooch, Nisha K, Schoenbaum, Geoffrey·2015·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The number of papers about the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) has grown from 1 per month in 1987 to a current rate of over 50 per month. This publication stream has implicated the OFC in nearly every function known to cognitive neuroscience and in most neuropsychiatric diseases. However, new ideas about OFC function are typically based on limited data sets and often ignore or minimize competing ideas or contradictory findings. Yet true progress in our understanding of an area's function comes as much from invalidating existing ideas as proposing new ones. Here we consider the proposed roles for OFC, critically examining the level of support for these claims and highlighting the data that call them into question.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3982

Cites

147 of 147 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The importance of OFC in reward processing has been challenged.

    “However, the importance of the OFC has been challenged in this and other work (Berridge and Kringelbach, 2008; Stalnaker et al., 2015).”

    From Circuit Mechanisms of Reward, Anhedonia, and Depression (2019) · cites this paper as Stalnaker et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [96]von Neumann J Morgenstern O Theory of Games and Economic Behavior Princeton University Press 1947
  2. [150]Schoenbaum G Setlow B Gallagher M Orbitofrontal cortex: modeling prefrontal function in rats The Neuropsychology of Memory Squire L Schacter D 463 477 Guilford Press 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stalnaker, T. A., Cooch, N. K., & Schoenbaum, G.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Schoenbaum, Geoffrey
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2015-04-28
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
620-627
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2020689320
Cited by
531
References
147
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 16
FWCI
5.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health (Z99 DA999999)
  • National Institute on Aging
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (ZIADA000587)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
orbitofrontal cortex, neuropsychiatric disorders, cognitive neuroscience
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Mapping, Decision Making, Emotions, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Judgment, Learning, Models, Neurological, Models, Psychological, Primates, Reward, Prefrontal Cortex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review