Cited by 507Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour

Rushworth, M.F.S., Behrens, T.E.J., Rudebeck, P.H., Walton, M.E.·2007·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

There is general acknowledgement that both the anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex are implicated in reinforcement-guided decision making, and emotion and social behaviour. Despite the interest that these areas generate in both the cognitive neuroscience laboratory and the psychiatric clinic, ideas about the distinctive contributions made by each have only recently begun to emerge. This reflects an increasing understanding of the component processes that underlie reinforcement-guided decision making, such as the representation of reinforcement expectations, the exploration, updating and representation of action values, and the appreciation that choices are guided not just by the prospect of reward but also by the costs that action entails. Evidence is emerging to suggest that the anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex make distinct contributions to each of these aspects of decision making.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2007.01.004

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Orbital frontal lesions, which spare the cingulum, disrupt emotional responsiveness to non-social cues.

    “In contrast, orbital frontal lesions (which spare the cingulum) additionally disrupt emotional responsiveness to non-social cues, e.g., to a snake (Rushworth et al., 2007).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Rushworth et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rushworth, M. F. S., Behrens, T. E. J., Rudebeck, P. H., & Walton, M. E.
Affiliations
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Rushworth, M.F.S.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
168-176
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000226539
Cited by
507
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 40
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
anterior cingulate cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, social behavior, action value, reward, exploration, emotions
MeSH terms
Animals, Decision Making, Frontal Lobe, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Social Behavior, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review