CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 110Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudySmoking Behavior and Cessation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuroadaptive changes in the mesoaccumbens dopamine system after chronic nicotine self-administration: A microdialysis study

Rahman, S., Zhang, J., Engleman, E.A., Corrigall, W.A.·2004·Neuroscience
DOI 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.08.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

There is little evidence to date to indicate if mesoaccumbens dopamine function at the neurochemical level is altered during early abstinence from chronic i.v. nicotine self-administration. Thus, a quantitative microdialysis (no-net-flux) approach was used to measure basal extracellular concentrations and extraction fractions of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens (ACB) of rats that self-administered nicotine i.v. for 25 days, as well as in rats serving as yoked comparison groups (yoked nicotine and yoked saline). After 24-48 h of the final self-administration session, there was a significant reduction in basal extracellular dopamine levels in the ACB of the self-administration group compared with the yoked saline group (1.35+/-0.15 nM versus 3.70+/-0.28 nM). The basal extracellular dopamine levels in the yoked nicotine group (1.46+/-0.20 nM) were not significantly different compared with the nicotine self-administration group. The in vivo extraction fraction of dopamine, an indirect measure of dopamine uptake, was significantly increased in the nicotine self-administration (86%) and yoked nicotine (91%) groups compared with the yoked saline group (77%). In addition, a marked reduction in the elevation of extracellular dopamine levels in the ACB occurred after a nicotine challenge as measured by conventional microdialysis in the self-administration (112% of basal) and yoked nicotine (121% of basal) groups as compared with a yoked saline (154% of basal) group. The reduced basal ACB dopamine levels in the nicotine groups during early abstinence appears to be due to increased clearance, suggesting increased dopamine uptake is occurring as a result of the chronic nicotine treatment. The reduced elevation of extracellular dopamine levels in the ACB upon nicotine challenge suggests a functional desensitization or downregulation phenomenon involving acetylcholine receptors (nicotinic nAChRs). Overall, these results provide clear evidence for a neuroadaptive change that alters dopamine transmission in the ACB during abstinence from chronic i.v. nicotine exposure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.08.010

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Balfour, 2003, The psychopharmacology of tobacco dependence, J Clin Psychiatry Monogr, 18, 12
  2. Lonnroth, 1987, A microdialysis method allowing characterization of intracellular water space in humans, Am J Physiol, 253, E228
  3. Marks, 1985, Time course of the effects of chronic nicotine infusion on drug responses and brain receptors, J Pharmacol Ther, 235, 619

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 110

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Rahman, S., Zhang, J., Engleman, E. A., & Corrigall, W. A.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Rahman, S.
ORCID
Rahman, S.
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-01
Volume
129
Issue
2
Pages
415-424
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.08.010
OpenAlex
W2033657283
Cited by
110
References
64
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da009577-06)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 09577)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
nicotine self-administration, nicotine abstinence, nucleus accumbens, extracellular dopamine, dopamine uptake, extraction fraction, acetylcholine receptor, nicotinic receptor desensitization, neural adaptation, chronic nicotine exposure
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Conditioning, Operant, Dopamine, Extracellular Space, Infusions, Intravenous, Male, Synaptic Transmission, Nicotine, Nucleus Accumbens, Self Administration, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Microdialysis, Nicotinic Agonists, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review