Cited by 334Smoking Behavior and CessationNicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors StudyPrenatal Substance Exposure Effects

Rodent model of nicotine abstinence syndrome

Malin, David H., Lake, J.Ronald, Newlin-Maultsby, Paige, Roberts, Linda K., Lanier, Jacqueline G., Carter, Victoria A., Cunningham, J.Scott, Wilson, Owen B.·1992·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

Few animals models are currently in use for the recognized clinical problem of nicotine dependence and abstinence. This study introduces a rapid and convenient model using the rat. Sixteen male rats were rendered nicotine dependent by 7 days of continuous subcutaneous infusion of either 3 mg/kg/day (n = 8) or 9 mg/kg/day (n = 8) nicotine tartrate salt; 8 control rats were infused with saline alone. Rats were observed for 15 min before, during, and after the drug infusion period using a tally sheet modified from a standard checklist of opiate abstinence signs. There were few signs observed in any group at baseline and at the end of the infusion period. However, nicotine-infused rats showed a significant, dose-related increase over the control group at 16 h after the end of infusion, largely subsiding by 40 h. The most frequently observed signs during withdrawals included: teeth-chattering/chews, writhes/gasps, ptosis, tremors/shakes, and yawns. A significant drop in locomotor activity and increase in weight gain following termination of nicotine infusion provided additional evidence of an abstinence syndrome. This syndrome was alleviated by SC administration of 0.4 mg/kg nicotine tartrate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0091-3057(92)90408-8

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rodents chronically exposed to nicotine undergo a characteristic withdrawal syndrome that can occur spontaneously or be precipitated by mecamylamine.

    “Rodents chronically exposed to nicotine undergo a characteristic withdrawal syndrome which develops spontaneously, after removing the nicotine source, or can be precipitated by administration of a nAChR antagonist such as mecamylamine [7, 11, 81, 163–166].”

    From Mechanistic insights into nicotine withdrawal (2011) · cites this paper as [163]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malin, D. H., Lake, J. R., Newlin-Maultsby, P., Roberts, L. K., Lanier, J. G., Carter, V. A., Cunningham, J. S., & Wilson, O. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Houston (US)
  • University of Houston - Clear Lake (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
Malin, David H.
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-11
Volume
43
Issue
3
Pages
779-784
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083993994
Cited by
334
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
Keywords
nicotine dependence, nicotine withdrawal, withdrawal syndrome, rat model, withdrawal signs, locomotor activity, weight gain, nicotine self-administration
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Body Weight, Disease Models, Animal, Male, Motor Activity, Nicotine, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review