Cited by 59Nitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsOral microbiology and periodontitis researchExercise and Physiological Responses

Variability in nitrate-reducing oral bacteria and nitric oxide metabolites in biological fluids following dietary nitrate administration: an assessment of the critical difference

Open access
Liddle, Luke, Burleigh, Mia C., Monaghan, Chris, Muggeridge, David J., Sculthorpe, Nicholas, Pedlar, Charles R., Butcher, John, Henriquez, Fiona L. +1 more·2019·Nitric Oxide

Abstract

There is conflicting evidence on whether dietary nitrate supplementation can improve exercise performance. This may arise from the complex nature of nitric oxide (NO) metabolism which causes substantial inter-individual variability, within-person biological variation (CVB), and analytical imprecision (CVA) in experimental endpoints. However, no study has quantified the CVA and CVB of NO metabolites or the factors that influence their production. These data are important to calculate the critical difference (CD), defined as the smallest difference between sequential measurements required to signify a true change. The main aim of the study was to evaluate the CVB, CVA, and CD for markers of NO availability (nitrate and nitrite) in plasma and saliva before and after the ingestion of nitrate-rich beetroot juice (BR). We also assessed the CVB of nitrate-reducing bacteria from the dorsal surface of the tongue. It was hypothesised that there would be substantial CVB in markers of NO availability and the abundance of nitrate-reducing bacteria. Ten healthy male participants (age 25 ± 5 years) completed three identical trials at least 6 days apart. Blood and saliva were collected before and after (2, 2.5 and 3 h) ingestion of 140 ml of BR (∼12.4 mmol nitrate) and analysed for [nitrate] and [nitrite]. The tongue was scraped and the abundance of nitrate-reducing bacterial species were analysed using 16S rRNA next generation sequencing. There was substantial CVB for baseline concentrations of plasma (nitrate 11.9%, nitrite 9.0%) and salivary (nitrate 15.3%, nitrite 32.5%) NO markers. Following BR ingestion, the CVB for nitrate (plasma 3.8%, saliva 12.0%) and salivary nitrite (24.5%) were lower than baseline, but higher for plasma nitrite (18.6%). The CD thresholds that need to be exceeded to ensure a meaningful change from baseline are 25, 19, 37, and 87% for plasma nitrate, plasma nitrite, salivary nitrate, and salivary nitrite, respectively. The CVB for selected nitrate-reducing bacteria detected were: Prevotella melaninogenica (37%), Veillonella dispar (35%), Haemophilus parainfluenzae (79%), Neisseria subflava (70%), Veillonella parvula (43%), Rothia mucilaginosa (60%), and Rothia dentocariosa (132%). There is profound CVB in the abundance of nitrate-reducing bacteria on the tongue and the concentration of NO markers in human saliva and plasma. Where these parameters are of interest following experimental intervention, the CD values presented in this study will allow researchers to interpret the meaningfulness of the magnitude of the change from baseline.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.niox.2018.12.003

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liddle, L., Burleigh, M. C., Monaghan, C., Muggeridge, D. J., Sculthorpe, N., Pedlar, C. R., Butcher, J., Henriquez, F. L., & Easton, C.
Affiliations
  • University of the West of Scotland (GB)
  • University of the Highlands and Islands (GB)
  • St Mary's University Twickenham London (GB)
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
Corresponding author
Easton, Chris
Venue
Nitric Oxide
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
83
Pages
1-10
ISSN
1089-8603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902374800
Cited by
59
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Nitric Oxide (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The UWS Academic Portal (University of the West of Scotland) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • St Mary's University Repository (St Mary's University Twickenham London) (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Output (Edinburgh Napier University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • BGRO - Business, Governance and Religious Organisations Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Napier Research Repository (Edinburgh Napier University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • University of the West of Scotland
  • European Union’s INTERREG VA Programme
  • EU Programmes Body (SEUPB)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Exercise and Physiological Responses
Keywords
dietary nitrate, beetroot juice, nitric oxide metabolism, nitrate-reducing bacteria, nitrite, nitrate, critical difference, analytical imprecision, saliva, plasma, tongue microbiota, exercise performance, interindividual variability, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, Prevotella melaninogenica, Veillonella dispar, Haemophilus parainfluenzae
MeSH terms
Fruit and Vegetable Juices, Administration, Oral, Adult, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Prevotella melaninogenica, Humans, Male, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Micrococcaceae, Neisseria, Nitrates, Nitric Oxide, Veillonella, Biomarkers, Haemophilus parainfluenzae, Healthy Volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review