Cited by 29Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology Research

The effects of personality and metacognitive beliefs on cognitive training adherence and performance

Double, Kit S., Birney, Damian P.·2016·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.101

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Double, K. S., & Birney, D. P.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Double, Kit S.
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
102
Pages
7-12
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2471992495
Cited by
29
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council's (DP140101147)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
cognitive training, training adherence, personality, metacognitive beliefs, need for cognition, implicit theories of intelligence, openness to experience, Big Five personality traits, age-related cognitive decline, positive aging, older adults, training performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review