Cited by 117Cognitive Abilities and TestingPersonality Traits and PsychologyCognitive Functions and Memory

Influence of neuroticism and conscientiousness on working memory training outcome

Open access
Studer-Luethi, Barbara, Jaeggi, Susanne M., Buschkuehl, Martin, Perrig, Walter J.·2012·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2012.02.012

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Studer-Luethi, B., Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., & Perrig, W. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Studer-Luethi, Barbara
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
44-49
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114104079
Cited by
117
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
neuroticism, conscientiousness, working memory training, n-back task, individual differences, personality traits, transfer of training, near transfer, far transfer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review