Cited by 769Cognitive Abilities and TestingCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skillsDevelopmental and Educational Neuropsychology

Short- and long-term benefits of cognitive training

Open access
Jaeggi, Susanne M., Buschkuehl, Martin, Jonides, John, Shah, Priti·2011·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Does cognitive training work? There are numerous commercial training interventions claiming to improve general mental capacity; however, the scientific evidence for such claims is sparse. Nevertheless, there is accumulating evidence that certain cognitive interventions are effective. Here we provide evidence for the effectiveness of cognitive (often called "brain") training. However, we demonstrate that there are important individual differences that determine training and transfer. We trained elementary and middle school children by means of a videogame-like working memory task. We found that only children who considerably improved on the training task showed a performance increase on untrained fluid intelligence tasks. This improvement was larger than the improvement of a control group who trained on a knowledge-based task that did not engage working memory; further, this differential pattern remained intact even after a 3-mo hiatus from training. We conclude that cognitive training can be effective and long-lasting, but that there are limiting factors that must be considered to evaluate the effects of this training, one of which is individual differences in training performance. We propose that future research should not investigate whether cognitive training works, but rather should determine what training regimens and what training conditions result in the best transfer effects, investigate the underlying neural and cognitive mechanisms, and finally, investigate for whom cognitive training is most useful.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.1103228108

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive far-transfer effects from working memory training are unlikely to occur in specific subgroups, such as baseline underachievers.

    “Moreover, it is unlikely that WM training exerts positive far-transfer effects on subgroups of individuals (e.g., underachievers at baseline assessment; Jaeggi et al., 2011).”

    From Working memory training in typically developing children: A multilevel meta-analysis (2020) · cites this paper as Jaeggi et al., 2011

    The Results (page unavailable) report positive far transfer to fluid intelligence in the subgroup of children with large working-memory training gains, contrary to the claim that positive effects are unlikely in subgroups. The Discussion (page unavailable) finds no significant difference in transfer between children with high and low initial fluid-intelligence performance; it does not identify baseline underachievers as unlikely to benefit. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Previous studies typically compared low versus high training gain subgroups, and this responder analysis can be problematic.

    “Previous studies have examined the relationship between training gain and far transfer, typically by comparing subgroups of participants who show low versus high training gain31,38,39; however, this type of responder analysis can be problematic40.”
  • In Jaeggi et al. (2011), perceived difficulty of the training task negatively affected training-related gains.

    “they found that the perceived difficulty of the training task negatively affected training-related gains”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Jaeggi et al., 2011

  • Jaeggi et al. (2011) found that, compared with a control group performing knowledge and vocabulary-based tasks, the working-memory training group showed significant improvement on the training tasks.

    “Compared to a control group that performed knowledge and vocabulary-based tasks, the working-memory training group showed significant improvement on the training tasks”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Jaeggi et al., 2011

  • In Jaeggi et al. (2011), improvements on the training tasks were positively correlated with transfer gains in fluid intelligence.

    “improvements on the training tasks were positively correlated with transfer gains in terms of fluid intelligence”

    From Executive control training from middle childhood to adolescence (2014) · cites this paper as Jaeggi et al., 2011

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [1]Suter E, Marti B, Gutzwiller F. Jogging or walking—comparison of health effects. Ann Epidemiol. 1994;4:375–381. doi: 10.1016/1047-2797(94)90072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  2. [3]Salomon G, Perkins DN. Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educ Psychol. 1989;24:113–142. [Google Scholar]
  3. [5]Lustig C, Shah P, Seidler R, Reuter-Lorenz PA. Aging, training, and the brain: A review and future directions. Neuropsychol Rev. 2009;19:504–522. doi: 10.1007/s11065-009-9119-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [7]Cattell RB. Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. J Educ Psychol. 1963;54:1–22. doi: 10.1037/h0024654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  5. [8]Deary IJ, Strand S, Smith P, Fernandes C. Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence. 2007;35:13–21. [Google Scholar]
  6. [9]Rohde TE, Thompson LA. Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence. 2007;35:83–92. [Google Scholar]
  7. [10]Herrnstein RJ, Murray C. Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Free Press; 1996. [Google Scholar]
  8. [11]Jensen AR. Raising the IQ: The Ramey and Haskins study. Intelligence. 1981;5:29–40. [Google Scholar]
  9. [12]Engle RW, Tuholski SW, Laughlin JE, Conway ARA. Working memory, short-term memory, and general fluid intelligence: A latent-variable approach. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999;128:309–331. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.128.3.309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  10. [13]Shah P, Miyake A. Models of working memory: An introduction. In: Miyake A, Shah P, editors. Models of Working Memory: Mechanism of Active Maintenance and Executive Control. New York: Cambridge Univ Press; 1999. pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  11. [14]Pickering S, editor. Working Memory and Education. Oxford: Elsevier; 2006. [Google Scholar]
  12. [15]Gray JR, Chabris CF, Braver TS. Neural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence. Nat Neurosci. 2003;6:316–322. doi: 10.1038/nn1014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  13. [16]Kane MJ, et al. The generality of working memory capacity: A latent-variable approach to verbal and visuospatial memory span and reasoning. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004;133:189–217. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  14. [17]Jaeggi SM, Buschkuehl M, Jonides J, Perrig WJ. Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:6829–6833. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801268105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  15. [18]Jaeggi SM, et al. The relationship between n-back performance and matrix reasoning—implications for training and transfer. Intelligence. 2010;38:625–635. [Google Scholar]
  16. [20]Prensky M. Digital Game-Based Learning. New York: McGraw–Hill; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  17. [21]Squire K. Video games in education. Int J Intell Simulations Gaming. 2003;2:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  18. [22]Malone TW, Lepper MR. Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In: Snow RE, Farr MJ, editors. Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: III. Conative and Affective Process Analyses. Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1987. pp. 223–253. [Google Scholar]
  19. [23]Brown L, Sherbenou RJ, Johnsen SK. TONI-3: Test of Nonverbal Intelligence. 3rd Ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  20. [24]Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J. Raven's Progressive Matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologist Press; 1998. [Google Scholar]
  21. [26]Bjork EL, Bjork RA. Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In: Gernsbacher MA, Pew RW, Hough LM, Pomerantz JR, editors. Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society. New York: Worth; 2011. pp. 56–64. [Google Scholar]
  22. [27]Vygotsky L. Interaction between learning and development. In: Cole M, John-Steiner V, Scribner S, Souberman E, editors. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ Press; 1978. pp. 79–91. [Google Scholar]
  23. [31]Holmes J, Gathercole SE, Dunning DL. Adaptive training leads to sustained enhancement of poor working memory in children. Dev Sci. 2009;12:F9–F15. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00848.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  24. [33]Ball K, et al. Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study Group Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2271–2281. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  25. [34]Healy AF, Wohldmann EL, Sutton EM, Bourne LE., Jr Specificity effects in training and transfer of speeded responses. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006;32:534–546. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  26. [35]Jaeggi SM, Schmid C, Buschkuehl M, Perrig WJ. Differential age effects in load-dependent memory processing. Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2009;16:80–102. doi: 10.1080/13825580802233426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  27. [36]Shipstead Z, Redick TS, Engle RW. Does working memory training generalize? Psychol Belg. 2010;50:245–276. [Google Scholar]
  28. [37]Chein JM, Morrison AB. Expanding the mind's workspace: Training and transfer effects with a complex working memory span task. Psychon Bull Rev. 2010;17:193–199. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.2.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  29. [38]Whisman MA. The efficacy of booster maintenance sessions in behavior therapy: Review and methodological critique. Clin Psychol Rev. 1990;10:155–170. [Google Scholar]
  30. [39]Bell DS, et al. Knowledge retention after an online tutorial: A randomized educational experiment among resident physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1164–1171. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0604-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  31. [42]Basak C, Boot WR, Voss MW, Kramer AF. Can training in a real-time strategy video game attenuate cognitive decline in older adults? Psychol Aging. 2008;23:765–777. doi: 10.1037/a0013494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  32. [43]Dahlin E, Neely AS, Larsson A, Bäckman L, Nyberg L. Transfer of learning after updating training mediated by the striatum. Science. 2008;320:1510–1512. doi: 10.1126/science.1155466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  33. [44]Jonides J. How does practice makes perfect? Nat Neurosci. 2004;7:10–11. doi: 10.1038/nn0104-10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  34. [45]McNab F, et al. Changes in cortical dopamine D1 receptor binding associated with cognitive training. Science. 2009;323:800–802. doi: 10.1126/science.1166102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  35. [46]Kelly AM, Garavan H. Human functional neuroimaging of brain changes associated with practice. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:1089–1102. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page
  36. [48]Minear M, Shah P. Sources of working memory deficits in children and possibilities for remediation. In: Pickering S, editor. Working Memory and Education. Oxford: Elsevier; 2006. pp. 274–307. [Google Scholar]
  37. [49]McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989;60:48–58. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Shah, P.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2011-06-13
Volume
108
Issue
25
Pages
10081-10086
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1974081955
Cited by
769
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 47
FWCI
76.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Institute of Education Sciences (R324A090164)
  • Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
Keywords
cognitive training, brain training, working memory, fluid intelligence, transfer of training, individual differences, children, long-term effects
MeSH terms
Brain, Child, Cognition, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Surveys and Questionnaires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review