Cited by 298Personality Traits and PsychologyAging and Gerontology ResearchPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

Stability and change in the Big Five personality domains: Evidence from a longitudinal study of Australians.

Wortman, Jessica, Lucas, Richard E., Donnellan, M. Brent·2012·Psychology and Aging

Abstract

Longitudinal data from a nationally representative sample of Australians were used to evaluate mean-level differences and rank-order stability in personality traits assessed twice over a 4-year time span (n = 13,134). Extraversion, Neuroticism, and Openness declined over the life span, whereas Agreeableness increased among young cohorts, was stable among middle-aged cohorts, and declined among the oldest old. Cross-sectional analyses suggested an increase in Conscientiousness throughout the life span, though longitudinal analyses suggested a slight decline in late life. There was an inverted U-shaped pattern for rank-order stability, with peak stability occurring in middle age. For three of the Big Five domains (Extraversion, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness), age-related differences appeared to be somewhat more pronounced before age 30 than after age 30.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0029322

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The rank-order stability of personality traits is far from perfect over moderately long intervals and decreases over increasingly long delays.

    “In fact, the rank-order stability of personality traits is far from perfect over moderately long intervals (Lucas & Donnellan, 2001; Wortman, Lucas, & Donnellan, 2012; Roberts & DelVecchio, 2000; though see Ferguson, 2010) and it decreases over increasingly long delays.”

    From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Wortman, Lucas, & Donnellan, 2012

  • Personality traits can and do change across the entire life span.

    “Their relatively stable nature notwithstanding, personality traits can and do change across the entire life span.”

    From Life Events and Personality Trait Change. (2018) · cites this paper as Wortman, Lucas, & Donnellan, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wortman, J., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B.
Affiliations
Michigan State University (US)
Venue
Psychology and Aging
Published
2012
Volume
27
Issue
4
Pages
867-874
ISSN
  • 0882-7974 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1498
OpenAlex
W1977297766
Cited by
298
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
13.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, personality stability, rank-order stability, lifespan development, age differences, extraversion, neuroticism, openness to experience, agreeableness, conscientiousness, cohort differences, aging
MeSH terms
Neuroticism, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Anxiety Disorders, Australia, Extraversion, Psychological, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Personality Assessment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review