CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 80Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

The relationship between food reward and satiation revisited

Sclafani, Anthony, Ackroff, Karen·2004·Physiology & Behavior
DOI 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.045
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The postingestive satiating action of food is often viewed as producing a positive affective state that rewards eating. However, in an early test of this idea, Van Vort and Smith [Physiol. Behav. 30 (1983) 279] reported that rats did not learn to prefer a food that was "real-fed" and satiating over a food that was "sham-fed" and not satiating. Subsequent investigators obtained similar findings with concentrated nutrient sources. With dilute nutrient sources, however, rats learned to prefer the real-fed to the sham-fed food. These and other findings demonstrate that nutrients have rewarding postingestive effects that enhance food preferences via a conditioning process. These reward effects appear separate from the satiating actions of nutrients, which may actually reduce food reward. Food intake and preference are controlled by a complex interaction of positive and negative signals generated by nutrients in the mouth and at postingestive sites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.045

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nutrient sensors in the gastrointestinal tract and elsewhere in the body contribute to the generation of food reward during and after a meal.

    “nutrient sensors in the gastrointestinal tract and elsewhere in the body appear to also contribute to the generation of food reward during and after a meal ([153](#B153)).”

    From Food reward, hyperphagia, and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [153]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Sclafani, A., & Ackroff, K.
Affiliations
City University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Sclafani, Anthony
ORCID
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-08
Volume
82
Issue
1
Pages
89-95
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.physbeh.2004.04.045
OpenAlex
W2052366277
Cited by
80
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-31135)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
food reward, satiation, food preferences, sham feeding, food intake regulation, nutrient signaling, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Operant, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Humans, Reward, Satiation, Stomach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review