Cited by 132Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsPhysical Education and PedagogyPhysical education and sports games research

Do students with different motives for physical education respond differently to autonomy-supportive and controlling teaching?

Open access
De Meyer, Jotie, Soenens, Bart, Vansteenkiste, Maarten, Aelterman, Nathalie, Van Petegem, Stijn, Haerens, Leen·2016·Psychology of Sport and Exercise

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.06.001

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental studies indicate that learners benefit from an autonomy-supportive teaching style, with participants' motivational differences affecting these effects only to a limited extent.

    “Similarly, experimental studies indicate that learners benefit from an autonomy-supportive teaching style, with participants' motivational differences affecting these effects only to a limited extent (e.g., Delrue et al. 2019b;De Meyer et al. 2016;Flünger et al. 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Muth en, L. K., & Muth en, B. O. (2012). Mplus user's guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muth en & Muth en.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Meyer, J., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Aelterman, N., Van Petegem, S., & Haerens, L.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Venue
Psychology of Sport and Exercise
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
22
Pages
72-82
ISSN
1469-0292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W931264112
Cited by
132
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
8.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychology of sport and exercise (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Applied Research of the University College Ghent
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Physical education and sports games research
Keywords
autonomy support, physical education, student motivation, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, need satisfaction, need frustration, student engagement, teacher beliefs, motivational regulation, teaching styles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review