Cited by 49Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessEarly Childhood Education and Development

How can the blow of math difficulty on elementary school children’s motivational, cognitive, and affective experiences be dampened? The critical role of autonomy-supportive instructions.

Open access
Baten, Elke, Vansteenkiste, Maarten, De Muynck, Gert-Jan, De Poortere, Eline, Desoete, Annemie·2020·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

Although teachers are recommended to create a stimulating learning environment in which children can use, perfect, and extend their skills, this is far from easy. In many cases, identifying the optimal difficulty level of learning tasks involves a trial-and-error process during which teachers offer children too difficult tasks, with negative outcomes as a result. This experimental study investigated if autonomy-supportive instructions could dampen or even cancel out these presumed negative outcomes associated with math difficulty in elementary schoolchildren (N = 479; M-age = 9.41). After varying an autonomy-supportive versus a controlling instructional style through a comic book, children solved a series of either easy-medium or difficult math exercises, followed by the completion of questionnaires and the opportunity to choose the difficulty level of a final set of exercises to work on independently. Children who solved difficult, relative to easier, exercises reported less interest, more irritation, and more cognitive disengagement, while also seeking less challenge when asked to work independently. Need-based experiences of competence and autonomy accounted for these effects. Yet, the impairing impact of task difficulty could, at least partially, be dampened through the use of an autonomy-supportive relative to a controlling instructional style, which led to enhanced autonomy satisfaction. These findings largely occurred independent of children's motives for mathematics. The results have high practical value, especially for poor performers and children with mathematical learning disabilities, who find math to be harder overall. Limitations and implications for practice are discussed. Educational Impact and Implications Statement : Autonomy-supportive instructions (e.g., inviting language, meaningful rationale) were found to dampen the impairing effects of too difficult math tasks on children's motivational, cognitive, and affective experiences. This is especially important for poor performers and children with mathematical learning disabilities, who find math to be harder overall. An autonomy-supportive environment and avoiding too hard learning material may stimulate children to accept new challenges, thereby possibly improving chances for later academic/job success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/edu0000444

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in individuals' autonomous motivation, causality orientations, need strength and motive dispositions can moderate to some extent the relation between various need-supportive and need-thwarting practices and outcomes.

    “Yet, as for the first part of the model, differences in individuals' autonomous motivation (e.g., Baten et al. 2020;Black and Deci 2000;Mouratidis et al. 2011), causality orientations (e.g., Hagger and Chatzisarantis 2011), need strength (Katz et al. 2009) and motive dispositions (Sheldon and Schüler 2011) can moderate to some extent the relation between various need-supportive and need-thwarting”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baten, E., Vansteenkiste, M., De Muynck, G.-J., De Poortere, E., & Desoete, A.
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2020-11
Volume
112
Issue
8
Pages
1490-1505
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2995110658
Cited by
46
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
task difficulty, mathematics learning, elementary school students, interest, cognitive disengagement, challenge seeking, competence, autonomy, need satisfaction, mathematical learning disabilities, student motivation, emotional experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review