Cited by 32Psychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionFamily and Disability Support ResearchMental Health via Writing

Giving thanks: findings from a gratitude intervention with mothers of children with autism spectrum disorder.

Timmons, Lisa, Ekas, Naomi V.·2018·Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rasd.2018.01.008

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Timmons, L., & Ekas, N. V.
Affiliations
Texas Christian University (US)
Corresponding author
Timmons, Lisa
Venue
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
49
Pages
13-24
ISSN
  • 1878-0237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-9467
OpenAlex
W2794190362
Cited by
32
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in Autism (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
Keywords
gratitude interventions, autism spectrum disorder, mothers of autistic children, maternal well-being, parental self-efficacy, parenting satisfaction, relationship quality, positive psychology interventions, character strengths

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review