CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 57Disability Education and EmploymentWorkplace Health and Well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Sources and impact of occupational demands for autistic employees

Open access
Hayward, Susan M., McVilly, Keith R., Stokes, Mark A.·2020·Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101571
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101571

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuro-divergent employees are already at greater risk of over-commitment and effort-reward imbalance, and general occupational demands have a greater impact on autistic employees' well-being than they do for neuro-typical employees.

    “Previous research suggests that neuro-divergent employees are already at greater risk of over-commitment and effort-reward imbalance [67] and research with autistic employees suggests that general occupational demands have a greater impact on their well-being than they do for neuro-typical employees [33].”

    From Homeworking experiences of neuro-divergent workers: systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [33]

  • Workers with autism have a reason to embrace remote work, as it creates the opportunity to avoid uncomfortable informal social interactions that would otherwise interfere with job productivity.

    “In many ways, workers with autism have a reason to embrace the concept of remote work, as it creates the opportunity to avoid uncomfortable informal social interactions that would otherwise interfere with job productivity [13].”

    From Remote work support needs of employees with autism spectrum disorder in Poland: perspectives of individuals with autism and their coworkers (2022) · cites this paper as [13]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Hayward, S. M., McVilly, K. R., & Stokes, M. A.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hayward, Susan M.
ORCID
Venue
Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
76
Pages
101571
ISSN
  • 1878-0237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1750-9467
DOI
10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101571
OpenAlex
W3032158601
Cited by
57
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Research in Autism (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, autistic employees, job demands, job demands-resources model, workplace relationships, occupational stress, well-being, management relationships, organizational support, flexible work arrangements, employee assistance programs, workplace inclusion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review