Cited by 226Algal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Modern Developmental Aspects in the Field of Economical Harvesting and Biodiesel Production from Microalgae Biomass

Open access
Muhammad, Gul, Alam, Md Asraful, Mofijur, M., Jahirul, M.I., Lv, Yongkun, Xiong, Wenlong, Ong, Hwai Chyuan, Xu, Jingliang·2021·Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110209

Cites

216 of 216 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Harvesting with lipid production accounts for 90% of total energy demand and 20-30% of total production cost.

    “In addition, with the harvesting with lipid production accounting for 90% of total energy demand and 20 -30% of the total production cost, fl occulation has been considered a low operational and energy cost in recent years, with an operation and energy cost of € 0.1 -0.6/kg and 0.1 -0.7 k Wh/kg biomass respectively for closed cultivation (Muhammad et al., 2021; Vasistha et al., 2021).”

    From Strategies to Produce Cost-Effective Third-Generation Biofuel From Microalgae (2021) · cites this paper as Muhammad et al., 2021

  • Flocculation has been considered a low operational and energy cost method in recent years, with an operation and energy cost of €0.1-0.6/kg and 0.1-0.7 kWh/kg biomass respectively for closed cultivation.

    “In addition, with the harvesting with lipid production accounting for 90% of total energy demand and 20 -30% of the total production cost, fl occulation has been considered a low operational and energy cost in recent years, with an operation and energy cost of € 0.1 -0.6/kg and 0.1 -0.7 k Wh/kg biomass respectively for closed cultivation (Muhammad et al., 2021; Vasistha et al., 2021).”

    From Strategies to Produce Cost-Effective Third-Generation Biofuel From Microalgae (2021) · cites this paper as Muhammad et al., 2021

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muhammad, G., Alam, M. A., Mofijur, M., Jahirul, M. I., Lv, Y., Xiong, W., Ong, H. C., & Xu, J.
Affiliations
  • Zhengzhou University (CN)
  • University of Technology Sydney (AU)
  • Central Queensland University (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Alam, Md Asraful
  • Xu, Jingliang
Venue
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
135
Pages
110209
ISSN
1364-0321 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3049751855
Cited by
226
References
216
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 8
FWCI
6.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2019M662535)
  • Key Laboratory of Engineering Plastics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (2020HENZT08)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21650110457, 21908205)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
microalgae harvesting, flocculation, bioflocculation, biodiesel production, microalgal lipid extraction, biofuel commercialization, microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review