Cited by 126

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phases of reprogramming

David, Laurent, Polo, Jose M.·2014·Stem Cell Research

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.scr.2014.03.007

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Aoi, 2008, Generation of pluripotent stem cells from adult mouse liver and stomach cells, Science, 321, 699, 10.1126/science.1154884 · DOI
  2. Apostolou, 2013, Chromatin dynamics during cellular reprogramming, Nature, 502, 462, 10.1038/nature12749 · DOI
  3. Apostolou, 2013, Genome-wide chromatin interactions of the Nanog locus in pluripotency, differentiation, and reprogramming, Cell Stem Cell, 12, 699, 10.1016/j.stem.2013.04.013 · DOI
  4. Araki, 2010, Conversion of ancestral fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells, Stem Cells, 28, 213, 10.1002/stem.282 · DOI
  5. Bhutani, 2010, Reprogramming towards pluripotency requires AID-dependent DNA demethylation, Nature, 463, 1042, 10.1038/nature08752 · DOI
  6. Brambrink, 2008, Sequential expression of pluripotency markers during direct reprogramming of mouse somatic cells, Cell Stem Cell, 2, 151, 10.1016/j.stem.2008.01.004 · DOI
  7. Buckley, 2012, Regulation of pluripotency and cellular reprogramming by the ubiquitin–proteasome system, Cell Stem Cell, 11, 783, 10.1016/j.stem.2012.09.011 · DOI
  8. Buganim, 2012, Single-cell expression analyses during cellular reprogramming reveal an early stochastic and a late hierarchic phase, Cell, 150, 1209, 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.023 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Buganim, 2013, Mechanisms and models of somatic cell reprogramming, Nat. Rev. Genet., 14, 427, 10.1038/nrg3473 · DOI
  10. Carey, 2010, Single-gene transgenic mouse strains for reprogramming adult somatic cells, Nat. Methods, 7, 56, 10.1038/nmeth.1410 · DOI
  11. Carey, 2011, Reprogramming factor stoichiometry influences the epigenetic state and biological properties of induced pluripotent stem cells, Cell Stem Cell, 9, 588, 10.1016/j.stem.2011.11.003 · DOI
  12. Chen, 2013, H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs, Nat. Genet., 45, 34, 10.1038/ng.2491 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Chin, 2009, Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures, Cell Stem Cell, 5, 111, 10.1016/j.stem.2009.06.008 · DOI
  14. Di Stefano, 2014, C/EBPalpha poises B cells for rapid reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells, Nature, 506, 235, 10.1038/nature12885 · DOI
  15. Downing, 2013, Biophysical regulation of epigenetic state and cell reprogramming, Nat. Mater., 12, 1154, 10.1038/nmat3777 · DOI
  16. Golipour, 2012, A late transition in somatic cell reprogramming requires regulators distinct from the pluripotency network, Cell Stem Cell, 11, 769, 10.1016/j.stem.2012.11.008 · DOI
  17. Han, 2010, Tbx3 improves the germ-line competency of induced pluripotent stem cells, Nature, 463, 1096, 10.1038/nature08735 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hanna, 2008, Direct reprogramming of terminally differentiated mature B lymphocytes to pluripotency, Cell, 133, 250, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.03.028 · DOI
  19. Hanna, 2009, Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration, Nature, 462, 595, 10.1038/nature08592 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Hansson, 2012, Highly coordinated proteome dynamics during reprogramming of somatic cells to pluripotency, Cell Rep., 2, 1579, 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.10.014 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Heng, 2010, The nuclear receptor Nr5a2 can replace Oct4 in the reprogramming of murine somatic cells to pluripotent cells, Cell Stem Cell, 6, 167, 10.1016/j.stem.2009.12.009 · DOI
  22. Ho, 2011, Mechanistic insights into reprogramming to induced pluripotency, J. Cell. Physiol., 226, 868, 10.1002/jcp.22450 · DOI
  23. Hu, 2014, Tet and TDG mediate DNA demethylation essential for mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in somatic cell reprogramming, Cell Stem Cell, 14, 512, 10.1016/j.stem.2014.01.001 · DOI
  24. Kim, 2011, Donor cell type can influence the epigenome and differentiation potential of human induced pluripotent stem cells, Nat. Biotechnol., 29, 1117, 10.1038/nbt.2052 · DOI
  25. Koche, 2011, Reprogramming factor expression initiates widespread targeted chromatin remodeling, Cell Stem Cell, 8, 96, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.12.001 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Kumar, 2013, AID stabilizes stem-cell phenotype by removing epigenetic memory of pluripotency genes, Nature, 500, 89, 10.1038/nature12299 · DOI
  27. Ladewig, 2013, Leveling Waddington: the emergence of direct programming and the loss of cell fate hierarchies, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 14, 225, 10.1038/nrm3543 · DOI
  28. Li, 2010, A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts, Cell Stem Cell, 7, 51, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.014 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Liang, 2013, Embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell: an epigenetic perspective, Cell Res., 23, 49, 10.1038/cr.2012.175 · DOI
  30. Lin, 2012, Transcriptional amplification in tumor cells with elevated c-Myc, Cell, 151, 56, 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.026 · DOI
  31. Luo, 2013, NuRD blocks reprogramming of mouse somatic cells into pluripotent stem cells, Stem Cells, 31, 1278, 10.1002/stem.1374 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Maherali, 2007, Directly reprogrammed fibroblasts show global epigenetic remodeling and widespread tissue contribution, Cell Stem Cell, 1, 55, 10.1016/j.stem.2007.05.014 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Mansour, 2012, The H3K27 demethylase Utx regulates somatic and germ cell epigenetic reprogramming, Nature, 488, 409, 10.1038/nature11272 · DOI
  34. Marion, 2009, Telomeres acquire embryonic stem cell characteristics in induced pluripotent stem cells, Cell Stem Cell, 4, 141, 10.1016/j.stem.2008.12.010 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Megyola, 2013, Dynamic migration and cell–cell interactions of early reprogramming revealed by high-resolution time-lapse imaging, Stem Cells, 31, 895, 10.1002/stem.1323 · DOI
  36. Mikkelsen, 2008, Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis, Nature, 454, 49, 10.1038/nature07056 · DOI
  37. Nagy, 2013, Secondary cell reprogramming systems: as years go by, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 23, 534, 10.1016/j.gde.2013.07.004 · DOI
  38. Nie, 2012, c-Myc is a universal amplifier of expressed genes in lymphocytes and embryonic stem cells, Cell, 151, 68, 10.1016/j.cell.2012.08.033 · DOI
  39. Ohi, 2011, Incomplete DNA methylation underlies a transcriptional memory of somatic cells in human iPS cells, Nat. Cell Biol., 13, 541, 10.1038/ncb2239 · DOI
  40. Okita, 2007, Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells, Nature, 448, 313, 10.1038/nature05934 · DOI
  41. O'Malley, 2013, High-resolution analysis with novel cell-surface markers identifies routes to iPS cells, Nature, 499, 88, 10.1038/nature12243 · DOI
  42. Onder, 2012, Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming, Nature, 483, 598, 10.1038/nature10953 · DOI
  43. Papp, 2013, Epigenetics of reprogramming to induced pluripotency, Cell, 152, 1324, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.02.043 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Pasque, 2011, Epigenetic factors influencing resistance to nuclear reprogramming, Trends Genet., 27, 516, 10.1016/j.tig.2011.08.002 · DOI
  45. Polo, 2010, Cell type of origin influences the molecular and functional properties of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells, Nat. Biotechnol., 28, 848, 10.1038/nbt.1667 · DOI
  46. Sakurai, 2014, Kinome-wide functional analysis highlights the role of cytoskeletal remodeling in somatic cell reprogramming, Cell stem cell, 14, 523, 10.1016/j.stem.2014.03.001 · DOI
  47. Samavarchi-Tehrani, 2010, Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming, Cell Stem Cell, 7, 64, 10.1016/j.stem.2010.04.015 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Smith, 2010, Dynamic single-cell imaging of direct reprogramming reveals an early specifying event, Nat. Biotechnol., 28, 521, 10.1038/nbt.1632 · DOI
  49. Soufi, 2012, Facilitators and impediments of the pluripotency reprogramming factors' initial engagement with the genome, Cell, 151, 994, 10.1016/j.cell.2012.09.045 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Sridharan, 2009, Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency, Cell, 136, 364, 10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.001 · DOI
  51. Stadtfeld, 2010, Induced pluripotency: history, mechanisms, and applications, Genes Dev., 24, 2239, 10.1101/gad.1963910 · DOI
  52. Stadtfeld, 2008, Reprogramming of pancreatic beta cells into induced pluripotent stem cells, Curr. Biol., 18, 890, 10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.010 · DOI
  53. Stadtfeld, 2010, A reprogrammable mouse strain from gene-targeted embryonic stem cells, Nat. Methods, 7, 53, 10.1038/nmeth.1409 · DOI
  54. Tachibana, 2013, Human embryonic stem cells derived by somatic cell nuclear transfer, Cell, 153, 1228, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.006 · DOI
  55. Takahashi, 2006, Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors, Cell, 126, 663, 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Takahashi, 2007, Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors, Cell, 131, 861, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Tanabe, 2013, Maturation, not initiation, is the major roadblock during reprogramming toward pluripotency from human fibroblasts, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 110, 12172, 10.1073/pnas.1310291110 · DOI
  58. Utikal, 2009, Immortalization eliminates a roadblock during cellular reprogramming into iPS cells, Nature, 460, 1145, 10.1038/nature08285 · DOI
  59. Wernig, 2007, In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state, Nature, 448, 318, 10.1038/nature05944 · DOI
  60. Woltjen, 2009, piggyBac transposition reprograms fibroblasts to induced pluripotent stem cells, Nature, 458, 766, 10.1038/nature07863 · DOI
  61. Yamanaka, 2012, Induced pluripotent stem cells: past, present, and future, Cell Stem Cell, 10, 678, 10.1016/j.stem.2012.05.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 126

Metadata

Authors
David, L., & Polo, J. M.
Venue
Stem Cell Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
754-761
ISSN
1873-5061
Cited by
126
References
8
Language
en
Funders
  • Pays-de-la-Loire (2011-12957)
  • NHMRC (APP1036587)
  • ARC

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review