The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
H3K9 methylation is a barrier during somatic cell reprogramming into iPSCs
Abstract
The induction of pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) by defined factors is poorly understood stepwise. Here, we show that histone H3 lysine 9 (H3K9) methylation is the primary epigenetic determinant for the intermediate pre-iPSC state, and its removal leads to fully reprogrammed iPSCs. We generated a panel of stable pre-iPSCs that exhibit pluripotent properties but do not activate the core pluripotency network, although they remain sensitive to vitamin C for conversion into iPSCs. Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) were subsequently identified in serum as critical signaling molecules in arresting reprogramming at the pre-iPSC state. Mechanistically, we identified H3K9 methyltransferases as downstream targets of BMPs and showed that they function with their corresponding demethylases as the on/off switch for the pre-iPSC fate by regulating H3K9 methylation status at the core pluripotency loci. Our results not only establish pre-iPSCs as an epigenetically stable signpost along the reprogramming road map, but they also provide mechanistic insights into the epigenetic reprogramming of cell fate.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
H3K9me3 inhibits full reprogramming of pre-iPS cells into stem cells, effectively functioning as a barrier to pluripotency.
“Using this system, Chen and colleagues found that H3K9me3 inhibits full reprogramming of pre-iPS cells into stem cells, effectively functioning as a barrier to pluripotency 88 .”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [88]
Pre-iPS cells have embryonic stem cell-like morphology and SSEA-1 expression.
“These cells, which have embryonic stem cell-like morphology 88 and SSEA-1 expression 85 , may help to identify critical events occurring before cell identity programs are erased.”
From Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming (2023) · cites this paper as [88]
Citations
Cites
Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.024 · Cited by 26,673
IDH mutation impairs histone demethylation and results in a block to cell differentiation
Lu, C., Ward, P. S., Kapoor, G. S., Rohle, D., Turcan, S., Abdel-Wahab, O., Edwards, C. R., Khanin, R., Figueroa, M. E., Melnick, A., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10860 · Cited by 1,985
Chromatin-Remodeling Components of the BAF Complex Facilitate Reprogramming
Singhal, N., Graumann, J., Wu, G., Araúzo-Bravo, M. J., Han, D. W., Greber, B., Gentile, L., Mann, M., & Schöler, H. R. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.037 · Cited by 378
The role of nuclear architecture in genomic instability and ageing.
Oberdoerffer, P., & Sinclair, D. A. (2007) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2238 · Cited by 305
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- Takahashi, K. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 131, 861–872 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Yamanaka, S. & Blau, H.M. Nuclear reprogramming to a pluripotent state by three approaches. Nature 465, 704–712 (2010). · DOI
- Hussein, S.M. et al. Copy number variation and selection during reprogramming to pluripotency. Nature 471, 58–62 (2011). · DOI
- Bar-Nur, O., Russ, H.A., Efrat, S. & Benvenisty, N. Epigenetic memory and preferential lineage-specific differentiation in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from human pancreatic islet β cells. Cell Stem Cell 9, 17–23 (2011). · DOI
- Plath, K. & Lowry, W.E. Progress in understanding reprogramming to the induced pluripotent state. Nat. Rev. Genet. 12, 253–265 (2011). · DOI
- Mikkelsen, T.S. et al. Dissecting direct reprogramming through integrative genomic analysis. Nature 454, 49–55 (2008). · DOI
- Sridharan, R. et al. Role of the murine reprogramming factors in the induction of pluripotency. Cell 136, 364–377 (2009). · DOI
- Ang, Y.S. et al. Wdr5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network. Cell 145, 183–197 (2011). · DOI
- Onder, T.T. et al. Chromatin-modifying enzymes as modulators of reprogramming. Nature 483, 598–602 (2012). · DOI
- Li, R. et al. A mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition initiates and is required for the nuclear reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts. Cell Stem Cell 7, 51–63 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- Samavarchi-Tehrani, P. et al. Functional genomics reveals a BMP-driven mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in the initiation of somatic cell reprogramming. Cell Stem Cell 7, 64–77 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- Silva, J. et al. Promotion of reprogramming to ground state pluripotency by signal inhibition. PLoS Biol. 6, e253 (2008). · DOI
- Mattout, A., Biran, A. & Meshorer, E. Global epigenetic changes during somatic cell reprogramming to iPS cells. J. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 341–350 (2011). · DOI
- Stadtfeld, M. et al. Aberrant silencing of imprinted genes on chromosome 12qF1 in mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. Nature 465, 175–181 (2010). · DOI
- Stadtfeld, M. et al. Ascorbic acid prevents loss of Dlk1-Dio3 imprinting and facilitates generation of all–iPS cell mice from terminally differentiated B cells. Nat. Genet. 44, 398–405 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, J. et al. Towards an optimized culture medium for the generation of mouse induced pluripotent stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 31066–31072 (2010). · DOI
- Esteban, M.A. et al. Vitamin C enhances the generation of mouse and human induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 6, 71–79 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, T. et al. The histone demethylases Jhdm1a/1b enhance somatic cell reprogramming in a vitamin-C–dependent manner. Cell Stem Cell 9, 575–587 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- Hanna, J.H., Saha, K. & Jaenisch, R. Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues. Cell 143, 508–525 (2010). · DOI
- Ichida, J.K. et al. A small-molecule inhibitor of Tgf-β signaling replaces Sox2 in reprogramming by inducing Nanog. Cell Stem Cell 5, 491–503 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- Herrera, B. & Inman, G.J. A rapid and sensitive bioassay for the simultaneous measurement of multiple bone morphogenetic proteins. Identification and quantification of BMP4, BMP6 and BMP9 in bovine and human serum. BMC Cell Biol. 10, 20 (2009). · DOI
- David, L. et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-9 is a circulating vascular quiescence factor. Circ. Res. 102, 914–922 (2008). · DOI
- Wang, W. et al. Rapid and efficient reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells by retinoic acid receptor γ and liver receptor homolog 1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18283–18288 (2011). · DOI
- Feng, B. et al. Reprogramming of fibroblasts into induced pluripotent stem cells with orphan nuclear receptor Esrrb. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 197–203 (2009). · DOI
- Fritsch, L. et al. A subset of the histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases Suv39h1, G9a, GLP, and SETDB1 participate in a multimeric complex. Mol. Cell 37, 46–56 (2010). · DOI · Paper page
- Frontelo, P. et al. Suv39h histone methyltransferases interact with Smads and cooperate in BMP-induced repression. Oncogene 23, 5242–5251 (2004). · DOI
- Krishnan, S., Horowitz, S. & Trievel, R.C. Structure and function of histone H3 lysine 9 methyltransferases and demethylases. Chembiochem 12, 254–263 (2011). · DOI
- Loh, Y.H., Zhang, W., Chen, X., George, J. & Ng, H.H. Jmjd1a and Jmjd2c histone H3 Lys 9 demethylases regulate self-renewal in embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 21, 2545–2557 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
- Hanna, J. et al. Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature 462, 595–601 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
- Koche, R.P. et al. Reprogramming factor expression initiates widespread targeted chromatin remodeling. Cell Stem Cell 8, 96–105 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- Shi, Y. et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic fibroblasts by Oct4 and Klf4 with small-molecule compounds. Cell Stem Cell 3, 568–574 (2008). · DOI
- Lachner, M., O'Carroll, D., Rea, S., Mechtler, K. & Jenuwein, T. Methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 creates a binding site for HP1 proteins. Nature 410, 116–120 (2001). · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, J. et al. BMPs functionally replace Klf4 and support efficient reprogramming of mouse fibroblasts by Oct4 alone. Cell Res. 21, 205–212 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
- Childs, A.J. et al. BMP signaling in the human fetal ovary is developmentally regulated and promotes primordial germ cell apoptosis. Stem Cells 28, 1368–1378 (2010). · DOI
- Huang, W., Sherman, B.T. & Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 4, 44–57 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control
Allis, C. D., & Jenuwein, T. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.59 · Cited by 2,809
Pluripotent stem cells induced from mouse somatic cells by small-molecule compounds.
Hou, P., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Liu, C., Guan, J., Li, H., Zhao, T., Ye, J., Yang, W., Liu, K., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1239278 · Cited by 1,402
Senescence-associated reprogramming promotes cancer stemness
Milanovic, M., Fan, D. N. Y., Belenki, D., Däbritz, J. H. M., Zhao, Z., Yu, Y., Dörr, J. R., Dimitrova, L., Lenze, D., Monteiro Barbosa, I. A., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25167 · Cited by 1,131
Epigenetic reprogramming in cancer
Suvà, M. L., Riggi, N., & Bernstein, B. E. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1230184 · Cited by 706
Gao, Y., Chen, J., Li, K., Wu, T., Huang, B., Liu, W., Kou, X., Zhang, Y., Huang, H., Jiang, Y., et al. (2013) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2013.02.005 · Cited by 362
Self-citationRegulation of the epigenome by vitamin C
Young, J. I., Züchner, S., & Wang, G. (2015) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034228 · Cited by 319
Sridharan, R., Gonzales-Cope, M., Chronis, C., Bonora, G., McKee, R., Huang, C., Patel, S., Lopez, D., Mishra, N., Pellegrini, M., et al. (2013) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2768 · Cited by 220
Lineage-Determining Transcription Factor TCF-1 Initiates the Epigenetic Identity of T Cells
Johnson, J. L., Georgakilas, G., Petrovic, J., Kurachi, M., Cai, S., Harly, C., Pear, W. S., Bhandoola, A., Wherry, E. J., & Vahedi, G. (2018) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2018.01.012 · Cited by 226
Vitamin C in stem cell reprogramming and cancer
Cimmino, L., Neel, B. G., & Aifantis, I. (2018) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2018.04.001 · Cited by 197
Breathing-in epigenetic change with vitamin C
Monfort, A., & Wutz, A. (2013) · The EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/embor.2013.29 · Cited by 140
Molecular Obstacles to Clinical Translation of iPSCs
Tapia, N., & Schöler, H. R. (2016) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2016.06.017 · Cited by 141
Li, W., Yang, L., He, Q., Hu, C., Zhu, L., Ma, X., Ma, X., Bao, S., Li, L., Chen, Y., et al. (2019) · Cell Stem Cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2019.06.008 · Cited by 124
Self-citationReprogramming the epigenome with vitamin C
Lee Chong, T., Ahearn, E. L., & Cimmino, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2019.00128 · Cited by 120
Vitamin C – A new player in regulation of the cancer epigenome
Gillberg, L., Ørskov, A. D., Liu, M., Harsløf, L. B. S., Jones, P. A., & Grønbæk, K. (2018) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.11.001 · Cited by 100
Vitamin C-induced epigenomic remodelling in IDH1 mutant acute myeloid leukaemia
Mingay, M., Chaturvedi, A., Bilenky, M., Cao, Q., Jackson, L., Hui, T., Moksa, M., Heravi-Moussavi, A., Humphries, R. K., Heuser, M., et al. (2018) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2017.171 · Cited by 94
Mechanisms, pathways and strategies for rejuvenation through epigenetic reprogramming
Cipriano, A., Moqri, M., Maybury-Lewis, S. Y., Rogers-Hammond, R., de Jong, T. A., Parker, A., Rasouli, S., Schöler, H. R., Sinclair, D. A., & Sebastiano, V. (2023) · Nature Aging · doi:10.1038/s43587-023-00539-2 · Cited by 66
The NuRD complex cooperates with SALL4 to orchestrate reprogramming
Wang, B., Li, C., Ming, J., Wu, L., Fang, S., Huang, Y., Lin, L., Liu, H., Kuang, J., Zhao, C., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38543-0 · Cited by 39
“…fi ed numerous barriers with repressive functions that act on pluripotent-associated genes, including DNA Methyltransferases (DNMT) 27 , Nucleosome Remodeling and histone Deacetylation (NuRD) 28 , histone deacetylases (HDACs) 29 , H3K9 methylation 30 , and chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF1) 31 .”
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, J., Liu, H., Liu, J., Qi, J., Wei, B., Yang, J., Liang, H., Chen, Y., Chen, J., Wu, Y., Guo, L., Zhu, J., Zhao, X., Peng, T., Zhang, Y., Chen, S., Li, X., Li, D., Wang, T., & Pei, D.
- Venue
- Nature Genetics
- Published
- 2012-12-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-42
- ISSN
- 1061-4036
- 1546-1718
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review