Cited by 360Sleep and related disordersInfant Health and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 164 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 101 of the 281 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond.

Open access
Mindell, Jodi A., Williamson, Ariel A.·2018·Sleep medicine reviews

Abstract

This paper presents a conceptual model and reviews the empirical evidence to support a nightly bedtime routine as a key factor in the promotion of not only healthy sleep, but also of broad development and wellbeing in early childhood. A bedtime routine embodies the characteristics of nurturing care and early child stimulation, which are deemed to be essential for positive outcomes, especially for at-risk children. Furthermore, common, adaptive components of a bedtime routine can contribute to an array of positive developmental outcomes beyond improved sleep, inclusive of language development, literacy, child emotional and behavioral regulation, parent-child attachment, and family functioning, among other outcomes. These bedtime routine components include activities in the broad domains of nutrition (e.g., feeding, healthy snack), hygiene (e.g., bathing, oral care), communication (e.g., reading, singing/lullabies) and physical contact (e.g., massage, cuddling/rocking). A bedtime routine can provide multiple benefits to child and family functioning at a time of day that many parents are present with their children. Although additional research on hypothesized routine-related child outcomes and mechanisms of action are needed, promoting a bedtime routine may be a feasible and cost-effective method to promote positive early childhood development worldwide, particularly for socioeconomically disadvantaged and other at-risk young children.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.smrv.2017.10.007

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

68 No full text of the sources · 41 Partly supported · 29 Own interpretation · 26 Supported · 8 Supported so far · 4 Sources not found · 2 Couldn’t confirm · 2 Not checked yet · 1 Not supported · 1 Own method · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 63
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 14
73 of 73
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The outcomes of child self-care/health and parent–child bonding/attachment in the conceptual model have not yet been studied in bedtime routine research.

    “To our knowledge, the conceptual model outcomes of child self-care/health and parent–child bonding/attachment have yet to be examined in the context of bedtime routine research.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Early dental caries are common worldwide and affect lower socioeconomic status children more heavily.

    “Early dental caries are highly prevalent worldwide, and disproportionately impact lower SES children.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Most caregivers are present at bedtime and can engage interactively with their children.

    “Bedtime is a time when most caregivers are present and can engage interactively with their children.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Cuddling and rocking during early childhood involves some skin-to-skin contact.

    “cuddling and rocking during early childhood likely involves some SSC.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a dose-dependent relationship between bedtime routine and outcomes.

    “to elicit the dose-dependent bedtime routine-outcome response relationship.”
5 of 5

Citations

Cites

Show all 164 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Fiese, 2002, Routines of daily living and rituals in family life: a glimpse at stability and change during the early child-raising years, Zero Three, 22, 10
  2. Maclean, 1987, Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood, Merrill-Palmer Q (1982-), 255
  3. Catterall, 2008, Unpacking the impact of music on intelligence, Neurosci Music Pedagogy, 171

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 360

Metadata

Authors
Mindell, J. A., & Williamson, A. A.
Affiliations
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
Corresponding author
Mindell, Jodi A.
Venue
Sleep medicine reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
40
Pages
93-108
ISSN
1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767478263
Cited by
360
References
164
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 5
FWCI
2.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
bedtime routines, early childhood development, children's sleep, nurturing care, language development, literacy, parent-child attachment, family functioning, vulnerable children, socioeconomic deprivation, bedtime reading, lullabies, physical contact, hygiene practices
MeSH terms
Sleep Hygiene, Child Development, Child Welfare, Child, Preschool, Habits, Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review