The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 164 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 101 of the 281 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond.
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a conceptual model and reviews the empirical evidence to support a nightly bedtime routine as a key factor in the promotion of not only healthy sleep, but also of broad development and wellbeing in early childhood. A bedtime routine embodies the characteristics of nurturing care and early child stimulation, which are deemed to be essential for positive outcomes, especially for at-risk children. Furthermore, common, adaptive components of a bedtime routine can contribute to an array of positive developmental outcomes beyond improved sleep, inclusive of language development, literacy, child emotional and behavioral regulation, parent-child attachment, and family functioning, among other outcomes. These bedtime routine components include activities in the broad domains of nutrition (e.g., feeding, healthy snack), hygiene (e.g., bathing, oral care), communication (e.g., reading, singing/lullabies) and physical contact (e.g., massage, cuddling/rocking). A bedtime routine can provide multiple benefits to child and family functioning at a time of day that many parents are present with their children. Although additional research on hypothesized routine-related child outcomes and mechanisms of action are needed, promoting a bedtime routine may be a feasible and cost-effective method to promote positive early childhood development worldwide, particularly for socioeconomically disadvantaged and other at-risk young children.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
68 No full text of the sources · 41 Partly supported · 29 Own interpretation · 26 Supported · 8 Supported so far · 4 Sources not found · 2 Couldn’t confirm · 2 Not checked yet · 1 Not supported · 1 Own method · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured
At least one cited source doesn’t support this claim or points to a different paper, and none confirmed it — see the verdicts below.
In the paper
“Bennett et al. [131] did not find evidence of any positive associations between massage and sleep when examining studies conducted with infants ages 0–6 mo.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Massage
What the sources say
- Disputedcites [131] Bennett, 2013, Massage for promoting mental and physical health in typically developing infants under the age of six months, Cochrane Database Syst Rev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page unavailable) report several positive sleep findings, including significantly fewer night wakings after massage and at three- and six-month follow-up. The review cautions that the overall evidence is poor and does not support routine use of massage in low-risk groups, but that is different from finding no evidence of any positive association with sleep. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Disputed
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“early childhood sleep problems are associated with a number of poor developmental outcomes across neurocognitive [4,5], social-emotional [6-9], physical health [10,11], and family functioning domains [12-15]”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Abstract
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [4] Beebe, 2011, Cognitive, behavioral, and functional consequences of inadequate sleep in children and adolescents, Pediatr Clin North Am source
The citation is attached to the neurocognitive domain, not to the sentence’s separate social-emotional, physical-health, or family-functioning domains. In “Adding a Developmental Context,” the paper reports associations between childhood sleep problems and later executive-function scores, learning, and intelligence. Page numbers are not available in the supplied passages. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [5] Turnbull, 2013, Behavioral sleep problems and their potential impact on developing executive function in children, Sleep source
The citation is attached to the neurocognitive outcome, not the separately cited social-emotional, physical-health, or family-functioning outcomes. The Introduction reports that poor school functioning and lower cognitive performance have been associated with sleep problems in children. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [6] Hysing, 2016, Pediatric sleep problems and social-emotional problems. A population-based study, Infant Behav Dev source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [7] Mindell, 2016, Sleep and social-emotional development in infants and toddlers, J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [8] Sivertsen, 2015, Later emotional and behavioral problems associated with sleep problems in toddlers: a longitudinal study, JAMA Pediatr source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] Williams, 2017, A developmental cascade model of behavioral sleep problems and emotional and attentional self-regulation across early childhood, Behav Sleep Med source
- Partly supportedcites [12] Hiscock, 2007, Improving infant sleep and maternal mental health: a cluster randomised trial, Arch Dis Child sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introduction (section M; page unavailable) links infant sleep problems with poor maternal health and links maternal depression with poorer mother-child relationships. The Discussion likewise says mothers reporting infant sleep problems suffer poorer mental health. These passages support an association with maternal well-being, but do not establish the broader family-functioning outcome attributed to this source; the other outcome domains are attached to different citations in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [13] Hiscock, 2001, Infant sleep problems and postnatal depression: a community-based study, Pediatrics source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [14] Meltzer, 2007, Relationship between child sleep disturbances and maternal sleep, mood, and parenting stress: a pilot study, J Fam Psychol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [15] Sadeh, 2010, Parenting and infant sleep, Sleep Med Rev source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A bedtime routine, in and of itself, embodies the characteristics of nurturing care and early child stimulation [1,3].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Abstract
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [1] Black, 2017, Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course, Lancet sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The life course conceptual framework describes nurturing care as responsive, emotionally supportive, and developmentally stimulating. The Home activities section identifies storytelling and singing as activities that promote early development. The paper does not discuss bedtime routines or establish that a routine, in and of itself, has those characteristics; pages were not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not matchedcites [3] World Bank, UNICEF, World Bank Group, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“engaging in regular routines can buffer against the effects of family stress [37] and individual child risk factors [28,38,39] on child wellbeing.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [37] Yoon, 2015, Parenting stress, dinnertime rituals, and child well-being in working-class families, Fam Relat source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [28] Yoo, 2010, The impact of health-promoting behaviors on low-income children's health: a risk and resilience perspective, Health Soc Work source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] Ivanova, 2006, Family stability as a protective factor against psychopathology for urban children receiving psychological services, J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol source
- Supportedcites [39] Rijlaarsdam, 2015, Early family regularity protects against later disruptive behavior, Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry source
The Discussion reports that regular mealtime and bedtime routines buffered infant boys high in anger or frustration from developing oppositional behavior, supporting the part of the citing sentence about individual child risk factors. The family-stress part is attached to citation [37], not this source; this paper’s finding concerns a specific risk factor and outcome. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“African American families, as well as families of lower SES, were less likely than Caucasian families and those of more advantaged backgrounds to engage in interactive and hygiene-related routines.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [25] Hale, 2009, Social and demographic predictors of preschoolers' bedtime routines, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
The Results section reports that Black mothers were less likely than white mothers to use interactive bedtime routines, and that hygiene-related routines were less common in families with Black mothers than with white mothers. It also links lower maternal education and poverty to less use of these routines, supporting the socioeconomic comparison for the preschool-age sample. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“increased engagement in general, everyday routines is associated with positive child outcomes, including enhanced language development, academic achievement, and social-emotional and behavioral functioning [21,33,34].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [21] Fiese, 2002, Routines of daily living and rituals in family life: a glimpse at stability and change during the early child-raising years, Zero Three
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites [33] Baldridge, 2011, Family stability and childhood behavioral outcomes: a critical review of the literature, J Fam Strengths sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Relational (dynamic) variables section links regular family routines and rituals to better social development, healthy behaviors, and fewer problematic behaviors. It does not link routines to enhanced language development or academic achievement; no page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Fiese, 2002, A review of 50 years of research on naturally occurring family routines and rituals: cause for celebration?, J Fam Psychol source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Caregiver presence and related activities at child sleep onset, as opposed to prior to lights out, can create problematic sleep onset associations that negatively impact sleep [19,24].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Allen, 2016, ABCs of SLEEPING: a review of the evidence behind pediatric sleep practice recommendations, Sleep Med Rev source
- Partly supportedcites [24] Mindell, 2006, Behavioral treatment of bedtime problems and night wakings in infants and young children, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The diagnostic criteria for sleep-onset association insomnia say that special conditions at sleep onset can delay or disrupt sleep when absent, and that nighttime awakenings may require caregiver intervention. The Parent Education/Prevention section recommends putting babies to bed “drowsy but awake.” The paper does not explicitly make the claimed contrast between caregiver activities at sleep onset and activities before lights out. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“preschoolers of African American or Hispanic/Latino racial/ethnic background, as well as those whose mothers had lower levels of educational attainment, were significantly less likely to follow a regular bedtime routine [25].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [25] Hale, 2009, Social and demographic predictors of preschoolers' bedtime routines, J Dev Behav Pediatr sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results report that children of Black and Hispanic mothers were less likely to have bedtime routines, and that lower maternal education was associated with being less likely to have one. But the Results also state that maternal education was not significantly associated with actually using a bedtime routine on four or more weeknights. Thus the claim is supported for having a routine, but not for lower-education children being less likely to follow it regularly. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“between 81% [25] and nearly 95% [17] of parents of infants, toddlers, and preschoolers report having a bedtime routine.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [25] Hale, 2009, Social and demographic predictors of preschoolers' bedtime routines, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
The Results report that 81% of children in the sample had a bedtime routine. The Method identifies the sample as 3-year-old children assessed through parent reports. This source supports the 81% figure attached to [25]; the nearly 95% figure is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] Mindell, 2009, Developmental aspects of sleep hygiene: findings from the 2004 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll, Sleep Med source
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“a dose-dependent relationship emerged between a bedtime routine and these sleep benefits. As the number of nights per week that a child followed the same bedtime routine increased, there were linear improvements across the sleep outcomes”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [23] Mindell, 2015, Bedtime routines for young children: a dose-dependent association with sleep outcomes, Sleep source
The Sleep Patterns section reports a linear relationship between bedtime-routine frequency and sleep outcomes, noting a few exceptions at one to two nights per week. The Discussion describes better sleep outcomes as the number of nights with a routine increases. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“parent–child attachment, child mood and emotional–behavioral regulation, and family stress levels are interrelated outcomes [1].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [1] Black, 2017, Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course, Lancet sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The 'Accumulation of adversities' section links family stress with difficulties in children’s self-regulation and says family adversity can undermine nurturing care. The 'Life course conceptual framework' also describes caregiver–child interactions and socio-emotional development as interconnected. Our copy does not specifically establish child mood, parent–child attachment, and family stress levels as interrelated outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.82)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“preschoolers with both a current and a history of a consistent bedtime routine showed the best sleep outcomes.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [23] Mindell, 2015, Bedtime routines for young children: a dose-dependent association with sleep outcomes, Sleep source
The Sleep Patterns section reports that preschool-aged children with both a current bedtime routine and one during infancy had the best sleep outcomes. The claim accurately paraphrases that finding. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Cross-sectional associations have been found within the United States [17,26,47] and internationally [23,30,48,49].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] Mindell, 2009, Developmental aspects of sleep hygiene: findings from the 2004 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [26] Henderson, 2010, Development and preliminary evaluation of the bedtime routines questionnaire, J Psychopathol Behav Assess source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [47] Fiese, 2007, Nighttime waking in children with asthma: an exploratory study of daily fluctuations in family climate, J Fam Psychol source
- Supportedcites [23] Mindell, 2015, Bedtime routines for young children: a dose-dependent association with sleep outcomes, Sleep source
The Participants section describes a survey of mothers in the United States and 12 other countries or regions. The Sleep Patterns and Discussion sections report associations between bedtime routines and sleep outcomes in this global sample, while explicitly treating the findings as correlational. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Mindell, 2010, Parental behaviors and sleep outcomes in infants and toddlers: a cross-cultural comparison, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [48] Mindell, 2017, Young child and maternal sleep in the Middle East, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [49] Sadeh, 2009, Sleep and sleep ecology in the first 3 years: a web-based study, J Sleep Res source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“having a language-based bedtime routine at age 3 y was predictive of increased nighttime sleep duration at age 5, by about 0.2 h.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [42] Hale, 2011, A longitudinal study of preschoolers' language-based bedtime routines, sleep duration, and well-being, J Fam Psychol source
The Measures section records language-based bedtime routines at 36 months and nighttime sleep duration at 60 months. The Results section reports that, after adjustment for child, mother, and household characteristics, children with those routines slept about 0.2 hours longer per night. The paper describes this as an association, consistent with the claim's predictive wording rather than a causal effect. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Children whose mothers indicated more consistent self-reported daytime discipline and limit-setting practices and a more consistent bedtime routine had the largest gains in nighttime sleep duration between 30 and 36 mo, by about 1 h.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [50] Staples, 2015, Bedtime routines in early childhood: prevalence, consistency, and associations with nighttime sleep, Monogr Soc Res Child Dev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that children with more consistent parenting and bedtime routines had the strongest gains in nightly sleep from 30 to 36 months. The Results report that this group slept about one hour longer at 36 months than the other groups, controlling for sleep at 30 months; they do not establish that the group's sleep duration itself increased by one hour over that interval. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Even after controlling for a number of child, maternal, and household characteristics, including race/ethnicity and SES”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [42] Hale, 2011, A longitudinal study of preschoolers' language-based bedtime routines, sleep duration, and well-being, J Fam Psychol source
The Measures section states that the models adjust for child characteristics and caregiver and household demographics. It specifically lists maternal ethnicity, education, and family income relative to poverty, supporting the claim about race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. No page number is provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Two of the intervention studies referenced above also demonstrated that the institution of a bedtime routine results in more positive maternal-rated child morning mood”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [40] Mindell, 2009, A nightly bedtime routine: impact on sleep in young children and maternal mood, Sleep source
The paper reports two intervention studies, one with infants and one with toddlers. In the sleep-wake tables (page unavailable), maternal ratings of morning mood improved significantly in both bedtime-routine groups (P < 0.001); the control groups showed no significant change. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Partly supportedcites [69] Mindell, 2011, Efficacy of an internet-based intervention for infant and toddler sleep disturbances, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page not provided) report improved parent-rated child morning mood in both intervention groups. However, the Methods and Discussion describe interventions with multiple recommendations, and the Results found no significant outcome difference from adding the prescribed bedtime routine. This study therefore does not establish that starting a bedtime routine caused the mood improvement. (LLM, conf=0.86)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Concurrently and over time, mother-reported child awakenings were not associated with bedtime routine adherence.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [50] Staples, 2015, Bedtime routines in early childhood: prevalence, consistency, and associations with nighttime sleep, Monogr Soc Res Child Dev source
The Results section, “Correlates of Adherence to Routine within and Across Time,” reports that mother-reported (signaled) night awakenings were not predicted by bedtime-routine adherence either concurrently or longitudinally. The Discussion also reports no support for an association between routine adherence and fewer parent-reported signaled awakenings. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“broader behavioral sleep interventions that include a bedtime routine have largely resulted in improved child sleep outcomes, including diminished bedtime resistance, decreased sleep onset latency and nighttime awakenings, and longer nighttime sleep duration”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Allen, 2016, ABCs of SLEEPING: a review of the evidence behind pediatric sleep practice recommendations, Sleep Med Rev source
- Partly supportedcites [24] Mindell, 2006, Behavioral treatment of bedtime problems and night wakings in infants and young children, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The General conclusions (section 7.1; page unavailable) report that behavioral interventions generally improved bedtime problems and night wakings, and that many studies included a consistent bedtime routine. The copy also discusses quicker sleep initiation and increased total sleep time, but it does not establish that routine-containing interventions generally shortened sleep-onset latency or lengthened nighttime sleep specifically. It does not evaluate a bedtime routine as a stand-alone treatment. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Greater weekly adherence to a bedtime routine was concurrently associated with increased nightly child sleep at 36 and 42 mo, but not at age 30 mo.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [50] Staples, 2015, Bedtime routines in early childhood: prevalence, consistency, and associations with nighttime sleep, Monogr Soc Res Child Dev source
The Results (Correlates of Adherence to Routine within and Across Time; page not provided) report that greater adherence was concurrently associated with more nightly sleep at 36 and 42 months, but not at 30 months. The Method identifies 87 children followed at those ages and defines adherence from bedtime-routine steps completed over seven nights. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaincorrelationaln = 87- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Studies that focus explicitly on implementing a bedtime routine have consistently shown positive effects on early childhood sleep”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [40] Mindell, 2009, A nightly bedtime routine: impact on sleep in young children and maternal mood, Sleep source
The sleep-diary results report improvements in sleep onset, continuity, and night wakings for both infants and toddlers after a consistent bedtime routine was implemented; the control group showed no significant changes. The paper concludes that the routine improved sleep in infants and toddlers with mild to moderate sleep problems. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [41] Field, 2001, Sleep problems in infants decrease following massage therapy, Early Child Dev Care source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [65] Galbraith, 1993, Behavioural treatment for sleep disturbance, Health Visit
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [66] Milan, 1982, Positive routines: a rapid alternative to extinction for elimination of bedtime tantrum behavior, Child Behav Ther source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Adams, 1989, Reducing bedtime tantrums: comparison between positive routines and graduated extinction, Pediatrics source
- Partly supportedcites [69] Mindell, 2011, Efficacy of an internet-based intervention for infant and toddler sleep disturbances, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Methods describe an intervention arm that implemented a prescribed bedtime routine, and the Results report improved infant and toddler sleep in both intervention arms. However, the Discussion says the study could not determine which recommendations produced the improvements, and adding the prescribed routine yielded no statistically significant additional benefit. This supports a positive effect of an intervention that included a routine, not a distinct effect of the routine itself. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Even after controlling for child and family socio-demographic characteristics, having a language-based bedtime routine at age three years significantly predicted higher language abilities and receptive vocabulary at age five years.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [42] Hale, 2011, A longitudinal study of preschoolers' language-based bedtime routines, sleep duration, and well-being, J Fam Psychol source
The Discussion reports that children with language-based bedtime routines at age 3 had significantly higher PPVT-R scores at age 5, even after adjustment for child, caregiver, and family characteristics. The paper describes these scores as cognitive or verbal skills; the claim's language-ability and receptive-vocabulary wording refers to this measured outcome, not two separately reported outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“These results were attenuated when age three years language and vocabulary scores were included in the model.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [42] Hale, 2011, A longitudinal study of preschoolers' language-based bedtime routines, sleep duration, and well-being, J Fam Psychol source
The Results section says the association was further attenuated when children's lagged (36-month) PPVT-R scores were added to the model. This matches the claim that the results weakened after including age-three vocabulary scores. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A large body of research indicates that proper nutrition during early childhood is necessary for physical health, including adequate growth and the prevention of illness”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [1] Black, 2017, Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course, Lancet sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Health and nutrition section (page unavailable) says that undernourished children are at high risk for developmental problems and that nutrition interventions are necessary to promote child development. The Early brain development section also links nutritional deficiencies to adverse growth outcomes. Neither passage establishes the claim that proper nutrition during early childhood prevents illness. (LLM, conf=0.83)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Maternal confidence in managing child sleep problems also increased, suggesting benefits for caregiver self-efficacy”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [69] Mindell, 2011, Efficacy of an internet-based intervention for infant and toddler sleep disturbances, Sleep source
The Results report improved mothers’ confidence in managing their child’s sleep following the intervention (P < 0.001). The Discussion likewise says mothers reported greater confidence in their ability to manage their child’s sleep, supporting the cautious inference about caregiver self-efficacy. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“The two bedtime routine intervention studies additionally found improvements in intervention mothers' self-reported mood compared to control mothers”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [40] Mindell, 2009, A nightly bedtime routine: impact on sleep in young children and maternal mood, Sleep source
The Mood state results (page not available in our copy) report significant improvements for mothers in both the infant and toddler bedtime-routine groups, while neither control group showed significant overall change. The Profile of Mood States methods describe the mothers’ questionnaire responses, supporting the description of mood as self-reported. (LLM, conf=0.93)
- Supportedcites [69] Mindell, 2011, Efficacy of an internet-based intervention for infant and toddler sleep disturbances, Sleep source
The Results (Maternal Mood State; page unavailable) report improvements on all self-reported mood subscales for mothers in the internet-plus-bedtime-routine group. The control group improved only on fatigue, and by less than the intervention groups. This paper supports the claim for the bedtime-routine intervention it studied; it is one of the two studies described, not evidence of two separate studies on its own. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“One study of 1278 children from the Gemini twin cohort found that those who had a shorter sleep duration at 16 mo of age consumed more nighttime calories from milk at 21 mo of age”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [91] McDonald, 2015, Sleep and nighttime energy consumption in early childhood: a population-based cohort study, Pediatr Obes source
The Abstract Methods identify 1278 Gemini twin-cohort families, with one child selected per family, and report sleep measured at 16 months and dietary intake at 21 months. The Abstract Results and Discussion state that shorter sleepers consumed more nighttime calories, with most of the additional intake coming from milk drinks. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelationaln = 1,278- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Hygiene-related activities such as bathing and brushing teeth have direct effects on children's health by preventing illness and disease”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [1] Black, 2017, Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course, Lancet sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Home activities section discusses storytelling, singing, and play, while Health and nutrition discusses illness as a risk for developmental problems. Neither addresses whether bathing or brushing teeth prevents illness or disease in children; searches for those activities and hygiene found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [94] Blume-Peytavi, 2012, Skin care practices for newborns and infants: review of the clinical evidence for best practices, Pediatr Dermatol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [95] American Academy of Pediatrics, 2016, Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines and Policies source
- Partly supportedcites [96] Sheiham, 2006, Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre-school children, Br Dent J sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page unavailable) says untreated dental caries can harm children's health and that preventing caries would be preferable to treating it. It does not discuss bathing or toothbrushing, or establish that those activities directly prevent illness and disease. (LLM, conf=0.79)
- Partly supportedcites [97] Tinanoff, 2009, Update on early childhood caries since the Surgeon General's Report, Acad Pediatr sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Tooth Brushing with Fluoridated Toothpaste” section says that daily brushing with fluoride toothpaste reduces caries incidence in young children. It also says evidence that brushing by itself reduces caries is limited. The paper does not address bathing or the broader prevention of illness and disease claimed here. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Could not verify
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Breastfeeding has also been associated with an average increase in child intelligence of about three intelligence quotient (IQ) points”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [80] Victora, 2016, Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect, Lancet source
The section “Long term effects: Obesity, NCDs and intelligence” reports that breastfeeding was associated with a pooled increase of 3.4 IQ points across 16 observational studies. That supports the citing sentence’s approximate three-point association. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Breastfeeding may also facilitate increased parent–child bonding and attachment, although there is less available research on this topic.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [81] Smith, 2011, Feeding patterns and emotional care in breastfed infants, Soc Indic Res source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [82] Moore, 2007, Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source
- Could not verifycites [83] Neelon, 2014, Regulations to promote healthy sleep practices in child care, Pediatrics sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) addresses child-care sleep regulations, sleep and obesity, and a previous study of infant-feeding regulations; it does not address bonding or attachment. Searches for breastfeeding and parent–child bonding, including maternal–infant attachment, found no passage supporting the claim or its statement about the amount of research available. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [84] Feldman, 2007, Parent–infant synchrony biological foundations and developmental outcomes, Curr Dir Psychol Sci source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [85] Bakermans-Kranenburg, 2003, Less is more: meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood, Psychol Bull source
- Could not verifycites [86] Bernard, 2013, Parental synchrony and nurturance as targets in an attachment based intervention: building upon Mary Ainsworth's insights about mother–infant interaction, Attach Hum Dev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Nurturance section links parents’ responses to infant distress with attachment security, but does not discuss breastfeeding. A search for breastfeeding and feeding-related terms found only a mention of feeding among the factors Ainsworth observed; our copy does not address whether breastfeeding facilitates bonding or whether research on that question is limited. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [87] Britton, 2006, Breastfeeding, sensitivity, and attachment, Pediatrics source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [88] Verhage, 2016 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“While listening to stories, children who had greater exposure to reading at home showed higher levels of brain activation in areas related to semantic processing, suggesting a neurobiological mechanism linking early reading activities to positive child literacy outcomes.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [108] Hutton, 2015, Home reading environment and brain activation in preschool children listening to stories, Pediatrics source
The Results in the Abstract report that greater home reading exposure was positively correlated with activation in brain areas supporting semantic processing during a story-listening task. The Conclusions likewise report significantly greater activation in those areas among children exposed to more parent-child reading. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A study of 19 2–5-y-olds also found that increased home literacy exposure can impact the developing brain [108].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [108] Hutton, 2015, Home reading environment and brain activation in preschool children listening to stories, Pediatrics sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract reports 19 participating families, but describes the eligible children as 3–5 years old, not 2–5. The Conclusions report an association between home reading environment and brain activation and suggest that reading may shape the developing brain; the study does not establish a causal impact. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“practicing regular oral hygiene from an early age is critical for supporting child health”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [96] Sheiham, 2006, Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre-school children, Br Dent J sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper says that preventing caries is preferable to treating it and that untreated caries can harm preschool children’s growth and well-being (Abstract; page not available). It does not specifically address regular oral hygiene practices or establish that beginning them early supports child health. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Partly supportedcites [97] Tinanoff, 2009, Update on early childhood caries since the Surgeon General's Report, Acad Pediatr sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Tooth Brushing with Fluoridated Toothpaste” section reports that daily brushing with fluoride toothpaste reduces caries in 3–6-year-olds, supporting early preventive care. It also says evidence that brushing or oral hygiene alone prevents caries is weak. The source therefore does not support the broader, unqualified claim that regular oral hygiene is critical for child health. (LLM, conf=0.86)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Recommendations to promote early literacy and cognitive development have emphasized the need for frequent, high-quality interactions around reading or singing that begin early in development [18], in order to capitalize on increased neuroplasticity between ages 0 and 3 y [1,103,104].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [18] Pediatrics, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Partly supportedcites [1] Black, 2017, Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course, Lancet sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Home activities section says storytelling and singing expose young children to experiences that promote early development, and it discusses adults reading to children. The life course framework also emphasizes responsive caregiving and early learning. Neither passage specifically recommends frequent, high-quality reading or singing interactions or links those activities to early literacy and cognitive development; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [103] Duursma, 2008, Reading aloud to children: the evidence, Arch Dis Child source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [104] Zuckerman, 2010, Reach Out and Read: evidence based approach to promoting early child development, Curr Opin Pediatr source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Collectively, these studies, as well as the two bedtime routine studies that have shown a link between reading activities before bedtime and child literacy-related outcomes [42,71] highlight the benefits of including parent–child book sharing as a bedtime routine component for child language, literacy, and cognitive development.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [42] Hale, 2011, A longitudinal study of preschoolers' language-based bedtime routines, sleep duration, and well-being, J Fam Psychol source
The Introduction (page unavailable) says shared book reading at bedtime may encourage cognitive development and facilitate vocabulary, language, reading skills, and positive attitudes toward literacy. The Discussion (page unavailable) also reports higher vocabulary scores among children with language-based bedtime routines, while noting that those routines included activities besides reading. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [71] High, 1998, Evaluation of a clinic-based program to promote book sharing and bedtime routines among low-income urban families with young children, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“poor oral hygiene in early childhood leads to the development of dental caries in childhood and adolescence”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [97] Tinanoff, 2009, Update on early childhood caries since the Surgeon General's Report, Acad Pediatr sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Risk Factors for ECC > Visible Plaque section reports that plaque on primary teeth correlates with caries risk in young children. But Interventions to Reduce ECC > Tooth Brushing with Fluoridated Toothpaste says the relationship between oral hygiene status and caries experience is weak. The paper does not establish that poor hygiene causes caries or that this effect extends into adolescence. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] Alm, 2012, Caries in adolescence–influence from early childhood, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Dental caries in early childhood can inhibit weight gain and growth”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [96] Sheiham, 2006, Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre-school children, Br Dent J source
The Abstract reports that preschool children with severe caries weighed less than controls and gained weight more rapidly after treatment. It also states that untreated caries can reduce food intake and affect growth, supporting the claim that early-childhood caries can inhibit weight gain and growth. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“studies have shown that health-related quality of life is higher among children who engage in regular dental hygiene and who have healthy teeth, both during the preschool years and during later development”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [28] Yoo, 2010, The impact of health-promoting behaviors on low-income children's health: a risk and resilience perspective, Health Soc Work source
- Partly supportedcites [96] Sheiham, 2006, Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre-school children, Br Dent J sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The supplied passage labeled Abstract reports significantly poorer oral health-related quality of life among preschool children with untreated early childhood caries than among children without it. It does not establish that regular dental hygiene is associated with higher quality of life, or that the quality-of-life difference persists during later development. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [100] Abanto, 2011, Impact of oral diseases and disorders on oral health-related quality of life of preschool children, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [101] Shaghaghian, 2015, Impact of oral hygiene on oral health-related quality of life of preschool children, Int J Dent Hyg source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Oral hygiene likely has an indirect effect on sleep through the prevention of dental caries and related oral pain, as studies have shown that untreated dental caries are associated with pain-related sleep disruption”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [96] Sheiham, 2006, Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre-school children, Br Dent J source
The Abstract says untreated caries and associated infection can cause pain, and that the impacts of severe caries include disturbed sleeping habits. It also reports improved sleep after dental treatment, supporting the cited link between caries-related pain and sleep disruption in children. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Partly supportedcites [97] Tinanoff, 2009, Update on early childhood caries since the Surgeon General's Report, Acad Pediatr sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Child, Family and Societal Impact of ECC section reports that untreated caries commonly causes dental pain and that children’s dental pain affects sleep. The Tooth Brushing with Fluoridated Toothpaste section supports caries prevention through brushing with fluoride toothpaste, but says evidence for toothbrushing or oral hygiene alone is weak. The claim’s general reference to oral hygiene omits that important qualification. (LLM, conf=0.85)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Music is also thought to promote prosocial skills through engagement in synchronous, music-related behaviors (e.g., moving rhythmically, singing with others) [120-122].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Singing/lullabies
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [120] Rabinowitch, 2013, Long-term musical group interaction has a positive influence on empathy in children, Psychol Music source
The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies entrainment in musical group interaction as a process that can lead to synchronization and says it has been shown to promote social interaction and cooperation. That supports the citing sentence’s hedged claim that synchronous music-related behavior is thought to promote prosocial skills. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [121] Kirschner, 2010, Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children, Evol Hum Behav source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [122] Hallam, 2010, The power of music: its impact on the intellectual, social and personal development of children and young people, Int J Music Educ source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“investing early in the health and wellbeing of all children, but especially those who are at increased risk for poor outcomes, has been shown to be a robust and cost-effective method for conferring positive short- and longterm developmental outcomes [1,2].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [1] Black, 2017, Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course, Lancet sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction reports long-term benefits of early interventions for children exposed to poverty or adversity and says these findings provide strong economic justification for investment. The Delivery strategies section favors reaching vulnerable groups and discusses universal programming in communities facing extreme poverty or malnutrition. These passages support early investment, particularly for at-risk children, but do not establish that investment for all children is uniformly robust and cost-effective; the copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [2] Heckman, 2006, Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children, Science source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Finally, evidence linking massage with better early childhood sleep is mixed.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Massage
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [131] Bennett, 2013, Massage for promoting mental and physical health in typically developing infants under the age of six months, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source
The Discussion states that the small number of studies in the sleep meta-analysis produced conflicting results. The review concerns infants under six months, so its support for the claim is specific to sleep in that age group. (LLM, conf=0.94)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [41] Field, 2001, Sleep problems in infants decrease following massage therapy, Early Child Dev Care source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [52] Ferber, 2002, Massage therapy by mothers enhances the adjustment of circadian rhythms to the nocturnal period in full-term infants, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [67] Field, 2016, Mothers massaging their newborns with lotion versus no lotion enhances mothers' and newborns' sleep, Infant Behav Dev source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Field, 1996, Preschool children's sleep and wake behavior: effects of massage therapy, Early Child Dev Care source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“children and families of lower SES may face increased challenges implementing a consistent bedtime routine due to social and contextual issues.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [139] Bagley, 2015, What keeps low-SES children from sleeping well: the role of presleep worries and sleep environment, Sleep Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that lower SES was linked to environmental conditions, which in turn were linked to greater variability in children’s sleep schedules. That supports the concern about contextual barriers to consistency, but the study measured sleep timing, not families’ ability to implement a bedtime routine. It also found no direct association between lower SES and sleep-schedule variability. (LLM, conf=0.83)
- Partly supportedcites [140] Evans, 2004, The environment of childhood poverty, Am Psychol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Psychosocial Environment of Childhood Poverty (p. 5) reports that lower-income households tend to be more chaotic, with fewer routines and less structure. This supports the claim about contextual challenges to maintaining routines, but the paper does not specifically address bedtime routines or difficulty implementing one. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A bedtime routine that includes appropriate nutrition, hygiene, and communication-related activities may be critical in health promotion for these children, given that studies have shown increased risk for dental caries, other health concerns, and lower levels of school readiness and academic achievement in lower SES children and families [1,97,107].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [1] Black, 2017, Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course, Lancet sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s “Adversity, brain development, and protective influences” section (page unavailable) links low socioeconomic status and poverty with poorer cognitive and academic performance. Its “Home activities” section (page unavailable) also describes developmental benefits of activities such as storytelling and reading, with disparities by wealth. The copy does not support the more specific claim about bedtime routines, hygiene, dental caries, or school readiness. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Supportedcites [97] Tinanoff, 2009, Update on early childhood caries since the Surgeon General's Report, Acad Pediatr source
The Risk Factors for ECC > Socioeconomic Status passage states that preschool children from low-income families are more likely to have caries. In this multi-citation sentence, this dental-caries finding is the part attributable to this source; the proposed bedtime routine is the citing authors’ own conclusion. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Partly supportedcites [107] Raikes, 2006, Mother–child bookreading in low-income families: correlates and outcomes during the first three years of life, Child Dev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s opening discussion reports that low-income children are at risk for academic and reading failure and describes links between shared bookreading and early language and cognitive development. It does not address bedtime routines, nutrition, hygiene, dental caries, or health promotion; those parts of the citing sentence are not supported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Bennett et al. [131] did not find support for these effects in their meta-analytic review of 34 studies on massage for full-term infants, although the review was limited to research conducted with infants ages 0–6 mo.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Massage
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [131] Bennett, 2013, Massage for promoting mental and physical health in typically developing infants under the age of six months, Cochrane Database Syst Rev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion (page not available) identify 34 trials of full-term infants aged six months or younger and conclude that the evidence does not support using massage to improve growth in this population; significant growth findings came from studies at high risk of bias. This review did not assess NICU length of stay. Its Background mentions shorter hospital stays only as a finding of reviews of preterm infants, so that part of the claim is not supported by this review's analysis. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In this study, 14-mo-old infants who were bounced synchronously while listening to music were more likely to exhibit prosocial and altruistic behavior compared to infants who were bounced asynchronously or were not bounced at all [123].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Singing/lullabies
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [123] Cirelli, 2014, Interpersonal synchrony increases prosocial behavior in infants, Dev Sci sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper reports greater spontaneous helping after synchronous than asynchronous bouncing, and its Discussion describes the helping as an early form of altruism. But the listed experimental conditions all involved bouncing; our copy does not support the claimed comparison with infants who were not bounced. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Partly supported
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“32% of toddlers and 12% of infants are watching television as part of their bedtime routine”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Mindell, 2010, Cross-cultural differences in infant and toddler sleep, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Mindell, 2010, Parental behaviors and sleep outcomes in infants and toddlers: a cross-cultural comparison, Sleep Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Other activities are also common in some countries, such as reading in New Zealand (59%) or singing songs in Indonesia (36%), but relatively rare in others.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Mindell, 2010, Cross-cultural differences in infant and toddler sleep, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Mindell, 2010, Parental behaviors and sleep outcomes in infants and toddlers: a cross-cultural comparison, Sleep Med source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Feeding (breast or bottle feeding) is highly common across all areas, with 73% of families reporting it as part of their child's bedtime routine.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Mindell, 2010, Cross-cultural differences in infant and toddler sleep, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Mindell, 2010, Parental behaviors and sleep outcomes in infants and toddlers: a cross-cultural comparison, Sleep Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“common, adaptive components of a bedtime routine can contribute to an array of positive developmental outcomes beyond improved sleep, inclusive of language development, literacy, child emotional and behavioral regulation, parent–child attachment, and family functioning, among other outcomes.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This paper presents a conceptual model and reviews the empirical evidence to support a nightly bedtime routine as a key factor in the promotion of not only healthy sleep, but also of broad development and wellbeing in early childhood.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“promoting a bedtime routine may be a feasible and cost-effective method to promote positive early childhood development worldwide, particularly for socioeconomically disadvantaged and other at-risk young children.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A bedtime routine can provide multiple benefits to child and family functioning at a time of day that many parents are present with their children.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“watching television as part of their bedtime routine, which has been found to negatively impact early childhood sleep duration and quality [31,32].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] Brockmann, 2016, Impact of television on the quality of sleep in preschool children, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [32] Xu, 2016, Associations of outdoor play and screen time with nocturnal sleep duration and pattern among young children, Acta Paediatr source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we propose that a bedtime routine is a vehicle for promoting an array of healthy developmental outcomes during early childhood.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“in a largely lower-income sample of US children ages 1–7 y, less than half (44%) of caregivers reported that their child followed a bedtime routine on a nightly basis [28].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [28] Yoo, 2010, The impact of health-promoting behaviors on low-income children's health: a risk and resilience perspective, Health Soc Work source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“the prevalence of having a consistent (implemented five or more nights per week) bedtime routine varied substantially, from 40% in India to 80% in the United Kingdom.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Mindell, 2010, Cross-cultural differences in infant and toddler sleep, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Mindell, 2010, Parental behaviors and sleep outcomes in infants and toddlers: a cross-cultural comparison, Sleep Med source
plainn = 29,287- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Overall, children from predominantly Asian countries/regions (China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Korea, Japan, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam) were significantly less likely than those from predominantly Caucasian countries (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United Kingdom, US) to have a consistent bedtime routine.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Mindell, 2010, Cross-cultural differences in infant and toddler sleep, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Mindell, 2010, Parental behaviors and sleep outcomes in infants and toddlers: a cross-cultural comparison, Sleep Med source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Another study of children ages 2–8 y found that both African American racial background and lower SES were associated with less consistent bedtime routines [26].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [26] Henderson, 2010, Development and preliminary evaluation of the bedtime routines questionnaire, J Psychopathol Behav Assess source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a bedtime routine that is longer than 30–40 min may also be viewed as maladaptive, as a prolonged bedtime routine may result in a later child bedtime and, in turn, a shorter sleep duration.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“in line with transactional models of child development and behavior [15], the outcome domains in this conceptual model represent a series of interactive processes that occur over the course of early child development, with potential bidirectional effects.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [15] Sadeh, 2010, Parenting and infant sleep, Sleep Med Rev source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the defined “maladaptive” and positive bedtime routine activities described in this paper may not apply to all children in the same way.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“children with neuro-developmental disabilities may do better with the inclusion of electronics use as part of the bedtime process to effectively relax [44].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [44] Jan, 2008, Sleep hygiene for children with neurodevelopmental disabilities, Pediatrics source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“children who follow a bedtime routine evidence significantly longer caregiver-reported sleep duration [17].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] Mindell, 2009, Developmental aspects of sleep hygiene: findings from the 2004 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll, Sleep Med source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“bedtime routine activities that do not fit well with the child or family may result in unanticipated negative consequences, such as caregiver–child conflict that prolongs bedtime and results in family stress.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“these types of bedtime behaviors have been linked to poor sleep [19,26,31,32] as well as worse psychosocial and physical health functioning (e.g., television-viewing; [43]).”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Allen, 2016, ABCs of SLEEPING: a review of the evidence behind pediatric sleep practice recommendations, Sleep Med Rev source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [26] Henderson, 2010, Development and preliminary evaluation of the bedtime routines questionnaire, J Psychopathol Behav Assess source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] Brockmann, 2016, Impact of television on the quality of sleep in preschool children, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [32] Xu, 2016, Associations of outdoor play and screen time with nocturnal sleep duration and pattern among young children, Acta Paediatr source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [43] Pagani, 2010, Prospective associations between early childhood television exposure and academic, psychosocial, and physical well-being by middle childhood, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“research has demonstrated that engaging in a regular bedtime routine is particularly beneficial for multiple aspects of early childhood sleep [19].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Allen, 2016, ABCs of SLEEPING: a review of the evidence behind pediatric sleep practice recommendations, Sleep Med Rev source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“research on the mechanisms of action by which engagement in routines confer positive child and family effects is limited [35].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [35] Spagnola, 2007, Family routines and rituals: a context for development in the lives of young children, Infants Young Child source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“involvement in a bedtime routine occurs within a larger social-ecological framework [45] in which there are multiple and interrelated child, family, neighborhood, and broader cultural and societal influences operating simultaneously.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [45] Bronfenbrenner, 1992
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“those in the bedtime routine condition evidenced a more rapid reduction in tantrums over the 6-wk course of treatment than those in the graduated extinction condition.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Adams, 1989, Reducing bedtime tantrums: comparison between positive routines and graduated extinction, Pediatrics source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The authors indicated that these changes together suggested an earlier adjustment of intervention infants' circadian rhythm to a nocturnal sleep period.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [52] Ferber, 2002, Massage therapy by mothers enhances the adjustment of circadian rhythms to the nocturnal period in full-term infants, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“when naptime music was played children in both age groups evidenced shorter sleep onset latencies, based on behavioral coding conducted by coders who were blinded to the study hypotheses.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [73] Field, 1999, Music enhances sleep in preschool children, Early Child Dev Care source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Two additional studies have reported on the use of massage [72] and music [73] as being beneficial pre-nap activities for promoting early childhood sleep.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Field, 1996, Preschool children's sleep and wake behavior: effects of massage therapy, Early Child Dev Care source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [73] Field, 1999, Music enhances sleep in preschool children, Early Child Dev Care source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“children who received a 20-min massage twice per week immediately before naptime for 5 wk at their preschool had shorter naptime sleep onset latencies than children in a wait-list control condition”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Field, 1996, Preschool children's sleep and wake behavior: effects of massage therapy, Early Child Dev Care source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Actigraphic recordings of infant sleep for one day pre-treatment, one day post-treatment, and at 6 and 8 wk of age showed that compared to control infants, infants who received massage showed peak activity levels in the morning hours.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [52] Ferber, 2002, Massage therapy by mothers enhances the adjustment of circadian rhythms to the nocturnal period in full-term infants, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Relative to those in the bedtime story condition, after one month of intervention, children in the massage group had less bedtime resistance and shorter sleep onset latencies”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [41] Field, 2001, Sleep problems in infants decrease following massage therapy, Early Child Dev Care source
plaindirectn = 23- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“children who had a consistent bedtime routine had more positive maternal-rated daily mood”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [48] Mindell, 2017, Young child and maternal sleep in the Middle East, Sleep Med source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“at 12 wk of age, infants in the treatment condition showed significantly higher levels of nocturnal melatonin (6-sulphatoxymelatonin) secretion.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [52] Ferber, 2002, Massage therapy by mothers enhances the adjustment of circadian rhythms to the nocturnal period in full-term infants, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One intervention study with 151 children (ages 12–38 mo) has shown null findings for the effects of a bedtime routine on sleep outcomes”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [71] High, 1998, Evaluation of a clinic-based program to promote book sharing and bedtime routines among low-income urban families with young children, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med source
plainn = 151- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Children in both intervention groups showed similar decreases in bedtime tantrums relative to the control condition.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Adams, 1989, Reducing bedtime tantrums: comparison between positive routines and graduated extinction, Pediatrics source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Having a consistent bedtime routine (≥4 nights per week) at age 36 mo was concurrently associated with increased child emotional and behavioral regulation.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [51] Zajicek-Farber, 2013, The buffering effect of childhood routines: longitudinal connections between early parenting and prekindergarten learning readiness of children in low-income families, J Soc Serv Res source
plaincorrelationaln = 2,977- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“children who did not have a regular bedtime or changed from a regular to a non-regular bedtime had increased emotional and behavioral difficulties, with a dose-dependent relationship between non-regular bedtimes and child difficulties.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] Kelly, 2013, Changes in bedtime schedules and behavioral difficulties in 7 year old children, Pediatrics source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Bedtime routines at 36 mo also buffered against the effects of early parenting stress.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [51] Zajicek-Farber, 2013, The buffering effect of childhood routines: longitudinal connections between early parenting and prekindergarten learning readiness of children in low-income families, J Soc Serv Res source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Increased child self-regulation at 36 mo was in turn predictive of better school readiness, including early numeracy and literacy development, at age 60 mo.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [51] Zajicek-Farber, 2013, The buffering effect of childhood routines: longitudinal connections between early parenting and prekindergarten learning readiness of children in low-income families, J Soc Serv Res source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“parents who were provided with an intervention that emphasized parent–child book sharing at bedtime reported significant improvements in their child's literacy orientation”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [71] High, 1998, Evaluation of a clinic-based program to promote book sharing and bedtime routines among low-income urban families with young children, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“feeding as part of the nighttime routine may promote sleep through increasing child satiety.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“breastfeeding has been associated with decreased likelihood of postpartum depression”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [79] Chung, 2007, Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries, Evid Technol Asses (Full Rep)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“including feeding as part of a bedtime routine can help to supplement early childhood nutrition, and in turn promote positive effects.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a healthy snack in response to child hunger or nutritional needs in children under age five may be an adaptive component of a bedtime routine.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“a recent review of snacking across ages and countries/regions suggests that it is not snacking per se, but the nutritional content of the snack and purpose of the snack (i.e., in response to hunger cues versus in response to boredom) that pose risks for overweight and obesity”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [93] Hess, 2016, What is a snack, why do we snack, and how can we choose better snacks? A review of the definitions of snacking, motivations to snack, contributions to dietary intake, and recommendations for improvement, Adv Nutr Int Rev J source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Meta-analytic research indicates that engaging in musical activities, including singing, is correlated with enhanced cognitive skills, likely via gains in visual-spatial reasoning [113,114], although to our knowledge there is no available research on singing or lullabies and such outcomes in the context of a bedtime routine.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Singing/lullabies
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [113] Catterall, 2008, Unpacking the impact of music on intelligence, Neurosci Music Pedagogy
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [114] Hetland, 2000, Learning to make music enhances spatial reasoning, J Aesthetic Educ source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“a longitudinal study of oral hygiene at ages 1, 3, and 6 y and dental health at age 15 y in a sample of 671 children showed that infrequent tooth-brushing at age 3 y was a significant predictor of adolescent caries”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [99] Alm, 2012, Caries in adolescence–influence from early childhood, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol source
plaincorrelationaln = 671- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the prevention of dental problems via early childhood oral hygiene may benefit long term child health and psychosocial outcomes, as well as aspects of family functioning”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggesting a neurobiological mechanism linking early reading activities to positive child literacy outcomes.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Levels of parent distress are also lower with fewer early childhood dental problems”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [100] Abanto, 2011, Impact of oral diseases and disorders on oral health-related quality of life of preschool children, Community Dent Oral Epidemiol source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“at least one previous study has found an association found between reading at bedtime and increased sleep duration [17].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] Mindell, 2009, Developmental aspects of sleep hygiene: findings from the 2004 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll, Sleep Med source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Recommendations for early literacy often reference singing songs or nursery rhymes to promote language and emergent literacy skills [103], particularly for increasing phonological awareness [109-112].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Singing/lullabies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [103] Duursma, 2008, Reading aloud to children: the evidence, Arch Dis Child source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [109] Anvari, 2002, Relations among musical skills, phonological processing, and early reading ability in preschool children, J Exp Child Psychol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [110] Bryant, 1989, Nursery rhymes, phonological skills and reading, J Child Lang source
- Not matchedcites [111] Maclean, 1987, Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood, Merrill-Palmer Q (1982-)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [112] Panel, 2000
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Meta-analytic reviews on 33 studies conducted between 1951 and 1993 [105] and 29 studies conducted between 1994 and 2009 [106] have also demonstrated that parent–child book sharing in early childhood positively impacts oral language abilities and emergent reading skills, which are necessary for school readiness and subsequent academic achievement.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [105] Bus, 1995, Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: a meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy, Rev Educ Res source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [106] Mol, 2011, To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood, Psychol Bull source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Adequate skin care and regular bathing promote skin barrier functions, including thermoregulation, gas exchange, hydration, and protection against infection”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [94] Blume-Peytavi, 2012, Skin care practices for newborns and infants: review of the clinical evidence for best practices, Pediatr Dermatol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [95] American Academy of Pediatrics, 2016, Pediatric Clinical Practice Guidelines and Policies source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Communicative activities, including reading and singing/lullabies, incorporate responsive caregiving and early learning opportunities.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“in meta-analysis of 13 preventive interventions for promoting positive parent–child interactions in mothers with depression, the inclusion of infant massage emerged as the most robust predictor of intervention-related increases in maternal sensitivity [130].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Massage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] Kersten-Alvarez, 2011, Which preventive interventions effectively enhance depressed mothers' sensitivity? A meta-analysis, Infant Ment Health J source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“several small-scale studies with older infant, toddler, and preschooler samples have demonstrated some positive effects of massage on sleep [41,52,67,72].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Massage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [41] Field, 2001, Sleep problems in infants decrease following massage therapy, Early Child Dev Care source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [52] Ferber, 2002, Massage therapy by mothers enhances the adjustment of circadian rhythms to the nocturnal period in full-term infants, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [67] Field, 2016, Mothers massaging their newborns with lotion versus no lotion enhances mothers' and newborns' sleep, Infant Behav Dev source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [72] Field, 1996, Preschool children's sleep and wake behavior: effects of massage therapy, Early Child Dev Care source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But just as important, and what we are proposing, is that the components of a bedtime routine in and of themselves are associated with broader positive outcomes.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Implementation of a nightly bedtime routine can support positive developmental outcomes for all children, worldwide.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Furthermore, all of these activities support early child stimulation.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“adequate health is supported by inclusion of nutrition- and hygiene-related activities (e.g., bathing, brushing teeth).”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“one of the bedtime routine studies that included a massage component also reported positive effects on child bedtime behavior as well as parental mood [41].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Massage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [41] Field, 2001, Sleep problems in infants decrease following massage therapy, Early Child Dev Care source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This finding suggests that cuddling and rocking can benefit sleep when these behaviors are enacted in the context of high parental sensitivity and responsiveness.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Cuddling/rocking
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the Field et al. [73] study (see also Table 1) on pre-nap music and sleep in young children, those exposed to background music fell asleep faster at naptime.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Singing/lullabies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [73] Field, 1999, Music enhances sleep in preschool children, Early Child Dev Care source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“observational studies cannot disentangle the effects of a bedtime routine on child outcomes from the effects of more broad household routines and structure.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Future directions for research
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 63
- Probably not a substantial claim. 14
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Interactive and hygiene-related routines were the most common, with 60% of families reporting interactive routines and 58% with hygiene-related routines.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [25] Hale, 2009, Social and demographic predictors of preschoolers' bedtime routines, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
The Results report that 60% of children engaged in interactive routines and 58% had hygiene-related routines, higher than the percentages for the other routine categories. The Discussion identifies the sample as relatively disadvantaged urban children, so these figures describe that sample rather than US families generally. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Hale et al. found in a study of 3217 families of preschoolers that although 81% indicated having a bedtime routine, 71% of the families reported implementing their bedtime routine on four of the past five weeknights [25].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [25] Hale, 2009, Social and demographic predictors of preschoolers' bedtime routines, J Dev Behav Pediatr source
The Methods (Sample; page not provided) identify an analysis sample of 3,217 children. The Results (page not provided) report that 81% had a bedtime routine and 71% engaged in one on at least four of the last five weeknights. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plainn = 3,217- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“it is unlikely that these components all serve as mechanisms of action, particularly as it could be that the presence of a positive, family-based routine and the cumulative effects of a consistent routine provide benefits above and beyond the discrete bedtime behaviors and activities [35,40].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [35] Spagnola, 2007, Family routines and rituals: a context for development in the lives of young children, Infants Young Child source
- Partly supportedcites [40] Mindell, 2009, A nightly bedtime routine: impact on sleep in young children and maternal mood, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“the results of this study held in both the infant/toddler and preschool age groups, in both predominantly Asian and predominantly Caucasian cultural regions, and when controlling for maternal education”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [23] Mindell, 2015, Bedtime routines for young children: a dose-dependent association with sleep outcomes, Sleep source
The Sleep Patterns section reports better sleep outcomes with consistent bedtime routines in both age groups. The Bedtime Routine section says the reported relationships were found within both predominantly Asian and predominantly Caucasian cultural groups, and the Discussion states that the associations remained after controlling for maternal education. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.93)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“increased bedtime routine consistency [23,40] and engagement in positive, healthy bedtime routine activities [19,25,26] are critical in conferring improved developmental outcomes.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [23] Mindell, 2015, Bedtime routines for young children: a dose-dependent association with sleep outcomes, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that more consistent bedtime routines were associated with better sleep and fewer parent-reported daytime behavior problems in young children. The Procedure section shows that the study asked about routine frequency, not the activities within routines. It does not establish that consistency or particular healthy activities are critical causes of improved developmental outcomes; the Introduction mentions cognitive development only when describing another study. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [40] Mindell, 2009, A nightly bedtime routine: impact on sleep in young children and maternal mood, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Discussion reports that a consistent nightly bedtime routine improved sleep and bedtime behavior in infants and toddlers. But the paper does not establish improved developmental outcomes, and its limitations section says it cannot determine whether the specific activities—or any individual component—were essential. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Allen, 2016, ABCs of SLEEPING: a review of the evidence behind pediatric sleep practice recommendations, Sleep Med Rev source
- Partly supportedcites [25] Hale, 2009, Social and demographic predictors of preschoolers' bedtime routines, J Dev Behav Pediatr sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The introduction describes consistent bedtime routines as associated with better sleep, which in turn is associated with better physical, behavioral, and cognitive outcomes. The Methods section identifies interactive and hygiene-related bedtime activities. But the paper does not establish that greater routine consistency or engagement in those activities is critical to causing improved developmental outcomes; its conclusion says routines may contribute to later differences. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [26] Henderson, 2010, Development and preliminary evaluation of the bedtime routines questionnaire, J Psychopathol Behav Assess source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“having a bedtime routine is associated with an earlier bedtime, shorter sleep onset latency, longer nighttime sleep duration, fewer night awakenings, and decreased caregiver-perceived child sleep problems [23].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [23] Mindell, 2015, Bedtime routines for young children: a dose-dependent association with sleep outcomes, Sleep source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaincorrelationaln = 10,085- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“improvements in child sleep can improve parent mood and family stress levels, with resulting improvements in parent mood and family stress enabling improved management of problematic bedtime behaviors, leading to a more consistent routine and better child sleep [40].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [40] Mindell, 2009, A nightly bedtime routine: impact on sleep in young children and maternal mood, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Mood state results (page unavailable) report improved maternal mood after a bedtime routine was introduced, alongside the child-sleep improvements described in the discussion. The paper does not establish the claimed feedback loop: it does not show that improved parent mood or reduced family stress enabled better management of bedtime behavior, producing a more consistent routine and further sleep gains. (LLM, conf=0.86)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Several studies have shown that a bedtime routine is associated with positive child mood and enhanced emotional–behavioral regulation.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [48] Mindell, 2017, Young child and maternal sleep in the Middle East, Sleep Med source
- Partly supportedcites [40] Mindell, 2009, A nightly bedtime routine: impact on sleep in young children and maternal mood, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The sleep-diary results (p. unavailable) report improved parent-rated morning mood in infants and toddlers after a bedtime routine. The discussion (p. unavailable) also reports fewer disruptive bedtime behaviors, but the paper does not establish the broader claim of enhanced emotional–behavioral regulation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Partly supportedcites [69] Mindell, 2011, Efficacy of an internet-based intervention for infant and toddler sleep disturbances, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results (page unavailable) report improved parental perceptions of children’s morning mood after an intervention that recommended a bedtime routine. The Discussion (page unavailable) says the added prescribed routine produced no statistically significant difference in outcomes, so the study does not isolate a routine-specific effect; it also does not report a measure of emotional–behavioral regulation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] Kelly, 2013, Changes in bedtime schedules and behavioral difficulties in 7 year old children, Pediatrics source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Although the two intervention conditions did not significantly differ in their effectiveness, effect sizes for the condition that included the bedtime routine were larger for some sleep outcomes.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [69] Mindell, 2011, Efficacy of an internet-based intervention for infant and toddler sleep disturbances, Sleep source
The Results (Child Sleep) report no significant difference between the two intervention groups for any sleep outcome at the end of treatment. They also state that effect sizes appeared slightly larger for many sleep outcomes in the internet-plus-routine group. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Relative to the control condition, there were also improvements in maternal-perceived child sleep quality, as well as reductions in maternal-perceived child bedtime resistance and broad sleep problems.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [40] Mindell, 2009, A nightly bedtime routine: impact on sleep in young children and maternal mood, Sleep source
The sleep-diary results (page unavailable in our copy) report improved parental perceptions of how well children slept and, for toddlers, bedtime ease; the control group showed no significant changes. The same section reports changed parental perceptions of whether their child had a sleep problem. Bedtime ease is a reasonable paraphrase of the claimed reduction in perceived bedtime resistance. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“From baseline to study week three, caregivers in the bedtime routine condition reported significant improvements in child sleep onset latency, the frequency and duration of night awakenings, and sleep consolidation, while mothers in the control condition reported no changes in child sleep.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [40] Mindell, 2009, A nightly bedtime routine: impact on sleep in young children and maternal mood, Sleep source
The Methods describe random assignment, and the paper reports 405 mother–child participants. The sleep-diary results and post hoc analyses report significant baseline-to-week-three improvements in sleep onset latency, night wakings, and sleep continuity in the routine groups, with no significant changes in the control groups. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.91)
plaindirectn = 405- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“greater adherence to a bedtime routine at age 30 mo predicted an increase in nighttime sleep duration from 30 to 36 mo, although this pattern was not found for the period of time between 36 and 42 mo.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [50] Staples, 2015, Bedtime routines in early childhood: prevalence, consistency, and associations with nighttime sleep, Monogr Soc Res Child Dev source
The Discussion states that adherence to a bedtime routine predicted increased nightly sleep minutes from 30 to 36 months, controlling for sleep at 30 months, but that the hypothesis was not supported at 42 months. It also notes that the gains at 36 months were strongest among children whose parents reported more consistent parenting practices. (LLM, conf=0.92)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“effects for both intervention conditions were maintained relative to controls in a one-year follow-up study, with 87% of mothers in bedtime routine condition continuing to use this specific routine at least half of the time”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [70] Mindell, 2011, Long-term efficacy of an internet-based intervention for infant and toddler sleep disturbances: one year follow-up, J Clin Sleep Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Child Sleep section reports that improvements were maintained at one year in both intervention groups, and Sleep Recommendations reports that 87.3% of mothers prescribed the routine continued using it at least half the time. The paper assessed changes within groups, however, rather than establishing that the maintained effects were relative to controls; the control group also improved on some sleep measures. (LLM, conf=0.84)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Both of the CSP conditions resulted in improved sleep onset latency, reduced number and duration of night awakenings, improved maternal perceptions of sleep quality, and reduced maternal perceptions of child sleep problems relative to the control condition.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [69] Mindell, 2011, Efficacy of an internet-based intervention for infant and toddler sleep disturbances, Sleep source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirectn = 264- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“following a predictive set of behaviors consistently before sleep onset can lead to increased compliance with a set bedtime, decreased arousal prior to bedtime, and positive sleep onset associations, all of which contribute to increased total sleep time, greater sleep consolidation, and better quality sleep”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Allen, 2016, ABCs of SLEEPING: a review of the evidence behind pediatric sleep practice recommendations, Sleep Med Rev source
- Partly supportedcites [24] Mindell, 2006, Behavioral treatment of bedtime problems and night wakings in infants and young children, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Proper nutrition during early childhood also helps to support brain growth [1], whereas protein malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies inhibit cognitive development and increase childhood risk for poor neuro-behavioral outcomes”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [1] Black, 2017, Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course, Lancet source
The citation follows the first clause, about early-childhood nutrition supporting brain growth. The Early brain development section states that nutrients promote healthy brain development; the later claim about protein malnutrition and micronutrient deficiencies is not attached to this citation. (LLM, conf=0.92)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [75] Morgane, 2002, Effects of prenatal protein malnutrition on the hippocampal formation, Neurosci Biobehav Rev source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [76] Tanner, 2002, Nutrition and brain development: social policy implications, Am J Orthopsychiatry source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“There is emerging evidence that breastfeeding may reduce the likelihood of child overweight status and diabetes”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [80] Victora, 2016, Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect, Lancet source
The Panel: Key Messages says there is growing evidence that breastfeeding protects against overweight and diabetes. The Conclusions likewise argue for growing evidence of protection while noting that residual confounding means there is no consensus; the citing sentence’s “emerging evidence” and “may” preserve that uncertainty. (LLM, conf=0.94)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“physiological co-regulation (or synchrony) through mother–child interactions increases maternal responsiveness to infant signals and broad maternal sensitivity [84], which are key factors in the development of secure infant–mother attachment”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [84] Feldman, 2007, Parent–infant synchrony biological foundations and developmental outcomes, Curr Dir Psychol Sci source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [85] Bakermans-Kranenburg, 2003, Less is more: meta-analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood, Psychol Bull source
- Partly supportedcites [86] Bernard, 2013, Parental synchrony and nurturance as targets in an attachment based intervention: building upon Mary Ainsworth's insights about mother–infant interaction, Attach Hum Dev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Synchrony section defines synchrony as a parent's contingent responsiveness to a child's cues and describes physiological co-regulation as a hypothesized mediator of children's regulatory outcomes. It does not say that co-regulation increases maternal responsiveness or broad maternal sensitivity. The Abstract links maternal sensitivity to attachment security, while the Nurturance section identifies responsiveness to infant distress—not synchrony—as particularly relevant to secure attachment. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [87] Britton, 2006, Breastfeeding, sensitivity, and attachment, Pediatrics source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [88] Verhage, 2016 source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Breastfeeding mothers tend to spend more time soothing and cuddling their infants compared to formula-fed babies [81], and also engage in more skin to skin contact (SSC), which has been associated with increased levels of mother–infant cortisol concordance and heightened maternal levels of oxytocin”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [81] Smith, 2011, Feeding patterns and emotional care in breastfed infants, Soc Indic Res source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [82] Moore, 2007, Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source
- Could not verifycites [83] Neelon, 2014, Regulations to promote healthy sleep practices in child care, Pediatrics sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s Overview describes a review of child-care sleep regulations, and its Discussion addresses sleep duration and obesity; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. Searches for breastfeeding, soothing, skin-to-skin contact, cortisol concordance, and maternal oxytocin found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Several meta-analytic reviews have demonstrated that breastfeeding during infancy protects against infant infections and infection-related mortalities as well as the development of malocclusion”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [78] Organization, 2013
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [79] Chung, 2007, Breastfeeding and maternal and infant health outcomes in developed countries, Evid Technol Asses (Full Rep)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Supportedcites [80] Victora, 2016, Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect, Lancet source
The Conclusions state that breastfeeding prevents morbidity from diarrhoea, respiratory infections, and otitis media and provides major protection where infectious diseases commonly cause death. The short-term effects section reports a meta-analysis associating breastfeeding with a 68% reduction in malocclusion. (LLM, conf=0.93)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“In this way, early parent–child book sharing and positive literacy outcomes are thought to be reciprocally related, with a “snowballing” effect in which benefits accumulate and gain momentum throughout child development [106,107].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [106] Mol, 2011, To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood, Psychol Bull source
- Partly supportedcites [107] Raikes, 2006, Mother–child bookreading in low-income families: correlates and outcomes during the first three years of life, Child Dev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Reading and Children's Language and Cognitive Development’ section (page unavailable) describes a reciprocal, ‘snowball’-like relationship in which reading and vocabulary growth gather momentum. But the study follows children only through 36 months; it does not establish that benefits accumulate throughout child development. (LLM, conf=0.84)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“studies of children and adolescents suggest that dental problems contribute to school absences and, in turn, to academic achievement”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [96] Sheiham, 2006, Dental caries affects body weight, growth and quality of life in pre-school children, Br Dent J sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract links high caries levels to school absence and diminished ability to learn, and reports parents’ perceptions of improved school performance after treatment. It focuses on young children rather than adolescents and does not establish that absences are the pathway by which dental problems affect academic achievement. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [102] Jackson, 2011, Impact of poor oral health on children's school attendance and performance, Am J Public Health sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Results and Discussion report that poorer oral health was associated with absences due to dental pain or infection, and that those absences were associated with poorer school performance. But the Results explicitly say that absences did not mediate the relationship between oral health and performance, so the claim’s “in turn” pathway is not established. The paper also says its cross-sectional data cannot establish cause and effect. (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Book sharing facilitates interest in reading and advanced language skills, which, in turn, influence continued engagement in reading activities, enhanced school readiness, and childhood academic achievement [106,107].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [106] Mol, 2011, To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood, Psychol Bull source
- Partly supportedcites [107] Raikes, 2006, Mother–child bookreading in low-income families: correlates and outcomes during the first three years of life, Child Dev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Bookreading and Children’s Language and Cognitive Development section (page unavailable) links shared bookreading with vocabulary development and positive attitudes toward reading. The Reading and Children’s Language and Cognitive Development section (page unavailable) describes a possible cycle of vocabulary gains and more reading, but cautions that the study cannot establish the direction of influence. The cited passages do not establish that this cycle improves school readiness or academic achievement, and the claim states the relationships more causally than the paper does. (LLM, conf=0.87)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“bathing prior to bedtime in childhood may increase core body temperature, with a subsequent decrease in core temperature promoting sleep onset”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [40] Mindell, 2009, A nightly bedtime routine: impact on sleep in young children and maternal mood, Sleep sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The discussion (page not provided) suggests that the bath in the bedtime routine may have improved children's sleep by affecting core body temperature. It does not say that bathing first raises core temperature or that a subsequent drop promotes sleep onset; the study did not measure that proposed sequence. (LLM, conf=0.85)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“children living in lower SES households may be more likely to have single caregivers and/or caregivers who engage in evening or shift work, as well experience increased household crowding, noise, and light exposure [139,140]”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [139] Bagley, 2015, What keeps low-SES children from sleeping well: the role of presleep worries and sleep environment, Sleep Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (§1.1; page unavailable) says fewer resources may make quiet, dark sleep environments harder to maintain and links smaller homes to tighter sleeping conditions. The Results (§3.4; page unavailable) associate lower income-to-needs ratios with more disruptive environmental conditions. The paper reports the proportion of single-parent families in its sample but does not link single caregiving to lower SES, and the passages found do not address caregivers’ evening or shift work. (LLM, conf=0.87)
- Partly supportedcites [140] Evans, 2004, The environment of childhood poverty, Am Psychol sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Environmental Risk and Developmental Outcomes (p. 10) reports that lower-social-class children in a London study more often lived with a single parent and in crowded homes. The Conclusions (p. 12) describe poor children’s households as more crowded and noisier. The passages do not support the additional claims about caregivers’ evening or shift work or increased light exposure (searched: shift work, evening work, and light exposure). (LLM, conf=0.88)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Across outcomes, there are more studies of massage with infants as opposed to with toddlers and preschoolers, and more evidence for the benefits of massage in high-risk groups, such as preterm infants [128,129] and infants of depressed mothers [130].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Massage
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [128] Field, 2010, Preterm infant massage therapy research: a review, Infant Behav Dev source
The citation is attached to preterm infants as an example of a high-risk group with evidence of massage benefits. The review’s “Massage Therapy Studies” section reports randomized controlled studies showing greater weight gain and shorter hospital stays in massaged preterm infants; the separate claim about infants of depressed mothers has its own citation. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [129] Vickers, 2004, Massage for promoting growth and development of preterm and/or low birth-weight infants, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source
This citation is attached to the preterm-infant example, not the separately cited example of infants of depressed mothers. The Effects of interventions section reports greater weight gain and a shorter hospital stay among preterm or low-birth-weight infants receiving massage, while noting that the weight-gain difference had low clinical significance. The review characterizes the overall evidence base as weak. (LLM, conf=0.86)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [130] Kersten-Alvarez, 2011, Which preventive interventions effectively enhance depressed mothers' sensitivity? A meta-analysis, Infant Ment Health J source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Two recent reviews of studies with preterm infants demonstrated that moderate (but not gentle) pressure massage can increase infant growth and reduce length of stay in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) [128,129], although effect sizes were small.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Massage
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [128] Field, 2010, Preterm infant massage therapy research: a review, Infant Behav Dev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The “Moderate Pressure is Critical” section reports greater weight gain with moderate rather than light pressure. “Massage Therapy Studies” reports greater weight gain and hospital stays 3–6 days shorter for preterm infants receiving massage. The review does not characterize these findings as having small effect sizes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [129] Vickers, 2004, Massage for promoting growth and development of preterm and/or low birth-weight infants, Cochrane Database Syst Rev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Effects of interventions section (page unavailable) reports greater daily weight gain with massage (5.1 g) and a shorter hospital stay (4.5 days), but no such advantage from gentle, still touch. It does not identify the effective massage as moderate-pressure massage; the Background describes neonatal massage as gentle stroking. It calls the weight-gain difference of low clinical significance, while the Discussion describes the shorter stay as of considerable value, so the blanket characterization of small effects is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“An adaptive bedtime routine generates rich opportunities to support positive early childhood developmental outcomes, and is a clear framework for promoting nurturing care (adequate health, nutrition, security and safety, responsive caregiving, and early learning opportunities) and early child stimulation [1,3].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [1] Black, 2017, Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course, Lancet sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Life course conceptual framework section links nurturing care—including responsive, developmentally stimulating care—to positive child development. The Home activities section says storytelling, singing, and play promote early development. Neither section identifies an adaptive bedtime routine as a framework or establishes its developmental effects; page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
- Not matchedcites [3] World Bank, UNICEF, World Bank Group, 2016
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“studies have shown increased risk for dental caries, other health concerns, and lower levels of school readiness and academic achievement in lower SES children and families [1,97,107].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [1] Black, 2017, Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course, Lancet sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The ‘Adversity, brain development, and protective influences’ section links low socioeconomic status and poverty to poorer cognitive and academic performance. The ‘Accumulation of adversities’ section describes broader developmental and health-related risks of poverty. Our copy does not address dental caries or explicitly establish lower school readiness among lower-SES children. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Partly supportedcites [97] Tinanoff, 2009, Update on early childhood caries since the Surgeon General's Report, Acad Pediatr sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Socioeconomic Status section states that preschool children from low-income families are more likely to have caries. The Child, Family and Societal Impact of ECC section discusses school absence among children with severe caries, but does not establish lower school readiness or academic achievement in lower-SES children; the paper also does not establish the claimed broader risk of other health concerns. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [107] Raikes, 2006, Mother–child bookreading in low-income families: correlates and outcomes during the first three years of life, Child Dev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (page not supplied) describes low-income children as at risk for academic and reading failure and reports early language and cognitive delays. It does not address dental caries or other health concerns, and it does not directly assess school readiness or later academic achievement. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“A recent review of 21 studies of KMC with low birthweight infants showed that this practice can benefit infant health and wellbeing, with positive impacts on infant weight, length, and head circumference, as well as selected measures of parent attachment [134].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Cuddling/rocking
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [134] Conde-Agudelo, 2016, Kangaroo mother care to reduce morbidity and mortality in low birthweight infants, Cochrane Database Syst Rev source
The Main results section reports 21 included studies, mostly evaluating KMC in low-birthweight infants. The Discussion’s Summary of main results reports increased weight, length, and head-circumference gain with intermittent KMC, as well as improvements in some measures of mother–infant attachment. It also reports increased weight gain and some attachment measures with continuous KMC. (LLM, conf=0.94)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“instituting a healthy bedtime routine may be particularly beneficial for promoting healthy outcomes in at-risk populations, such as socioeconomically disadvantaged young children and their families [25,138], as developing positive routines can act as a buffer against family stress and promote better outcomes.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [25] Hale, 2009, Social and demographic predictors of preschoolers' bedtime routines, J Dev Behav Pediatr sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Partly supportedcites [138] Martin, 2011, Parenting services may be an opportunity for improving bedtime routines among at-risk preschoolers, Behav Sleep Med sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The Bennett et al. review of massage in full-term infants did find some small effects for massage on infant personal and social behavior, but high risk of bias may have impacted study findings [131].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Massage
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [131] Bennett, 2013, Massage for promoting mental and physical health in typically developing infants under the age of six months, Cochrane Database Syst Rev sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Background reports a statistically significant effect on infant personal and social behaviour, and says one of the two contributing studies was at high risk of bias. It does not characterize that effect as small: the reported standardized mean difference is −0.90. The risk-of-bias caution is supported, but the magnitude qualifier is not. (LLM, conf=0.82)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“feeding and bathing are the most common activities in both age groups, but in line with expectations bedtime routine activities change across child age and development.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Mindell, 2010, Cross-cultural differences in infant and toddler sleep, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Mindell, 2010, Parental behaviors and sleep outcomes in infants and toddlers: a cross-cultural comparison, Sleep Med source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Bathing is also highly common (45% overall) but ranges from 6% in Indonesia to 81% in the United Kingdom.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] Mindell, 2010, Cross-cultural differences in infant and toddler sleep, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Mindell, 2010, Parental behaviors and sleep outcomes in infants and toddlers: a cross-cultural comparison, Sleep Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“early childhood sleep problems, such as difficulty falling/staying asleep and obstructive sleep apnea, are highly prevalent [16,17]”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [16] Hiscock, 2007, Adverse associations of sleep problems in Australian preschoolers: national population study, Pediatrics source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [17] Mindell, 2009, Developmental aspects of sleep hygiene: findings from the 2004 National Sleep Foundation Sleep in America Poll, Sleep Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“One of these sleep health recommendations is the implementation of a consistent bedtime routine, given the evidence of its sleep benefits [19], as well as the importance of childhood routines in general as a method to promote positive child development and family functioning [20].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Allen, 2016, ABCs of SLEEPING: a review of the evidence behind pediatric sleep practice recommendations, Sleep Med Rev source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [20] Combs-Orme, 2011, Anticipatory guidance and early child development: pediatrician advice, parent behaviors, and unmet needs as reported by parents from different backgrounds, Clin Pediatr (Phila) source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“routines are associated with higher levels of marital satisfaction [35] and lower levels of maternal distress [36].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [35] Spagnola, 2007, Family routines and rituals: a context for development in the lives of young children, Infants Young Child source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [36] Leiferman, 2005, Mothers' mental distress and parenting practices with infants and toddlers, Archiv Women's Ment Health source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“resulting in the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendation that sleep health be included as part of anticipatory guidance at well-child visits throughout development [18].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [18] Pediatrics, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Caucasian children demonstrating significantly more adaptive activities and fewer maladaptive activities relative to African American children. Increased SES was also positively associated with an increased number of adaptive bedtime routine activities.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Definition, prevalence, and components of a bedtime routine
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [26] Henderson, 2010, Development and preliminary evaluation of the bedtime routines questionnaire, J Psychopathol Behav Assess source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“early implementation of a bedtime routine provides the opportunity to establish long-term positive habits.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“having a bedtime routine is concurrently associated with better caregiver-reported sleep quality [26] and longer nighttime sleep duration [30], whereas the absence [48,49] or disruption [47] of a bedtime routine is correlated with increased night awakenings.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [26] Henderson, 2010, Development and preliminary evaluation of the bedtime routines questionnaire, J Psychopathol Behav Assess source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Mindell, 2010, Parental behaviors and sleep outcomes in infants and toddlers: a cross-cultural comparison, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [48] Mindell, 2017, Young child and maternal sleep in the Middle East, Sleep Med source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [49] Sadeh, 2009, Sleep and sleep ecology in the first 3 years: a web-based study, J Sleep Res source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a seemingly “adaptive” activity such as singing songs may be too stimulating for some children.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it stands to reason that a bedtime routine in particular, with its multiple steps and discrete family engagement and health-related activities, could promote far-reaching positive child developmental outcomes.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“this model is likely not exhaustive in regards to outcomes, and the benefits of a bedtime routine are likely more than the sum of its parts.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > A conceptual model for the benefits of a bedtime routine for broad child development
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention studies (Table 1), have provided robust evidence that following a bedtime routine is associated with a number of positive sleep outcomes, including an earlier bedtime, decreased sleep onset latency, reduced nighttime awakenings, increased sleep duration, and enhanced caregiver-reported sleep quality [19].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] Allen, 2016, ABCs of SLEEPING: a review of the evidence behind pediatric sleep practice recommendations, Sleep Med Rev source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“this study's intervention was primarily focused on encouraging parent–child book sharing at bedtime, as opposed to promoting parent–child engagement in a specific bedtime routine. In addition, the study intervention and control condition participants reported no difference in the information they received on bedtime routines”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [71] High, 1998, Evaluation of a clinic-based program to promote book sharing and bedtime routines among low-income urban families with young children, Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“frequency of nighttime massages was positively correlated with total infant sleep time, and negatively correlated with night awakenings.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [67] Field, 2016, Mothers massaging their newborns with lotion versus no lotion enhances mothers' and newborns' sleep, Infant Behav Dev source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Infants in the lotion massage condition evidenced fewer mother-reported nighttime awakenings and longer nighttime sleep durations relative to infants in the other two study conditions.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine on sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [67] Field, 2016, Mothers massaging their newborns with lotion versus no lotion enhances mothers' and newborns' sleep, Infant Behav Dev source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“children with non-regular bedtimes were less likely to engage in parent–child reading activities and regular mealtimes, suggesting that regular bedtime routines were unlikely for those without a set bedtime.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] Kelly, 2013, Changes in bedtime schedules and behavioral difficulties in 7 year old children, Pediatrics source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“families who implemented a bedtime routine to reduce bedtime tantrums reported significant improvements in marital satisfaction, whereas those in the comparison intervention and control conditions did not.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [68] Adams, 1989, Reducing bedtime tantrums: comparison between positive routines and graduated extinction, Pediatrics source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“mothers who engaged in massage reported child behavioral improvements at bedtime as well as decreased maternal anxiety about bedtime”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of a bedtime routine beyond improved sleep
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [41] Field, 2001, Sleep problems in infants decrease following massage therapy, Early Child Dev Care source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“mothers who chose to breastfeed their infants showed increased sensitivity during infant–mother interactions at infant age 3 mo. Sensitivity during these early dyadic interactions was in turn related to secure attachment when infants were 12 mo of age.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [87] Britton, 2006, Breastfeeding, sensitivity, and attachment, Pediatrics source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“inclusion of too much fluid at bedtime may result in a need for nighttime voiding, which could disrupt sleep.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“given that satiety contributes to somnolence [89], it could be that feeding prior to bedtime promotes sleep, particularly during early infancy when nutritional needs and feeding frequency are increased.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [89] Nicolaidis, 2006, Metabolic mechanism of wakefulness (and hunger) and sleep (and satiety): role of adenosine triphosphate and hypocretin and other peptides, Metabolism source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Animal research has shown that just as disruption of circadian rhythms and sleep deprivation can impact energy and hunger cues, malnutrition and appetite suppression are associated with dysregulated sleep”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [90] VanItallie, 2006, Sleep and energy balance: interactive homeostatic systems, Metabolism source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Direct links between breastfeeding and attachment were not found, suggesting that it is the quality of the mother–infant interactions, with breastfeeding providing a context that can facilitate positive interactions, that leads to better attachment outcomes.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [87] Britton, 2006, Breastfeeding, sensitivity, and attachment, Pediatrics source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Hunger and sleep both play a role in homeostatic regulation and are interrelated processes”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [89] Nicolaidis, 2006, Metabolic mechanism of wakefulness (and hunger) and sleep (and satiety): role of adenosine triphosphate and hypocretin and other peptides, Metabolism source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [90] VanItallie, 2006, Sleep and energy balance: interactive homeostatic systems, Metabolism source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Oral health care is one of the most prevalent unmet health needs among infants and toddlers, both in the United States and developing countries”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [98] Okunseri, 2015, Children's oral health assessment, prevention, and treatment, Pediatr Clin North Am source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Reading aloud to or reading with children (hereafter referred to as parent–child book sharing) has been linked to language development, literacy, and positive cognitive outcomes.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [18] Pediatrics, 2008
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Parent–child book sharing is a rich and interactive activity that can facilitate parent–child communication and increase parent sensitivity to child learning and broad developmental progress [103,106].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [103] Duursma, 2008, Reading aloud to children: the evidence, Arch Dis Child source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [106] Mol, 2011, To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood, Psychol Bull source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“the Reach out and Read (ROR) program, in which pediatricians and other health professionals provide free books and anticipatory guidance related to parent–child book sharing, has shown that these efforts can increase parent–child reading frequency and improve child language development [103,104].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Reading
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [103] Duursma, 2008, Reading aloud to children: the evidence, Arch Dis Child source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [104] Zuckerman, 2010, Reach Out and Read: evidence based approach to promoting early child development, Curr Opin Pediatr source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Including bathing and teeth brushing as part of a consistent bedtime routine may facilitate early learning of proper self-care and health-related habits, which are important for subsequent child health-related quality of life and psychosocial functioning.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Hygiene
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“In a review on the effects of massage therapy on child and adult biochemistry, Field et al. [132] found evidence that massage therapy can decrease cortisol and increase serotonin and dopamine, suggesting that massage therapy could reduce stress and promote positive mood.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Massage
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [132] Field, 2005, Cortisol decreases and serotonin and dopamine increase following massage therapy, Int J Neurosci source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“suggesting that massage therapy could reduce stress and promote positive mood.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Massage
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“After participating in a music and movement program, which included the teaching of songs and lullabies, mothers of 2–6 mo-old infants showed increased mother–infant reciprocity and duration of infant directed speech, as well as more positive maternal perceptions of mother–infant attachment, compared to mothers in the control condition [116].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Singing/lullabies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [116] Vlismas, 2013, The effects of music and movement on mother–infant interactions, Early Child Dev Care source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Parental affection and a secure parent–child relationship additionally are associated with enhanced child psychological functioning, with meta-analytic data providing long-term evidence of the importance of early parent–child bonds for subsequent psychological wellbeing and adjustment [135,136].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Cuddling/rocking
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [135] Madigan, 2013, Attachment and internalizing behavior in early childhood: a meta-analysis, Dev Psychol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [136] Pasco Fearon, 2011, Infant–mother attachment and the growth of externalizing problems across the primary-school years, J Child Psychol Psychiatry source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“some studies of premature infants show benefits of background music [124] or parent singing/lullabies [125] on infant sleep, whereas others do not [126,127].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Singing/lullabies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [124] Loewy, 2013, The effects of music therapy on vital signs, feeding, and sleep in premature infants, Pediatrics source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [125] Lai, 2006, Randomized controlled trial of music during kangaroo care on maternal state anxiety and preterm infants' responses, Int J Nurs Stud source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [126] Dearn, 2014, The effect of maternal presence on premature infant response to recorded music, J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [127] Dorn, 2014, Influence of acoustic stimulation on the circadian and ultradian rhythm of premature infants, Chronobiol Int source
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Physical contact, such as cuddling, rocking, and massage are linked to increased feelings of security.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One study of bedtime practices and maternal emotional availability, which was assessed by coding videos of maternal behaviors (sensitivity, scaffolding, intrusiveness and hostility) at bedtime in 44 mother–infant dyads, showed that increased maternal emotional availability was associated with decreased night awakenings [137], although close physical contact was not.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Cuddling/rocking
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [137] Teti, 2010, Maternal emotional availability at bedtime predicts infant sleep quality, J Fam Psychol source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A bedtime routine provides the seemingly obvious benefits to sleep and to reduction of sleep problems, as well the indirect links to improved wellbeing through better sleep.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Implications
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“some initial studies have provided evidence for effects of musical engagement on family functioning and child psychosocial outcomes, including decreased levels of parental distress [118], as well as improved positive parent–child interactions, parenting-related irritability, and mental health [119].”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Benefits of bedtime routine activities > Singing/lullabies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [118] Custodero, 2003, Musical lives: a collective portrait of American parents and their young children, J Appl Dev Psychol source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [119] Nicholson, 2008, Impact of music therapy to promote positive parenting and child development, J Health Psychol source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“conclusions about some bedtime routine components, such as massage, and outcomes, such as child emotional–behavioral regulation and family functioning, are limited by small sample sizes and a prior focus on special populations (e.g., premature infants, mothers with depression), and thus require further study.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Future directions for research
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“to elicit the dose-dependent bedtime routine-outcome response relationship.”
§ Benefits of a bedtime routine in young children: Sleep, development, and beyond > Future directions for practice
plaincorrelational- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: There is a dose-dependent relationship between bedtime routine and outcomes.
The paper relies on this without support.
The outcomes of child self-care/health and parent–child bonding/attachment in the conceptual model have not yet been studied in bedtime routine research.
“To our knowledge, the conceptual model outcomes of child self-care/health and parent–child bonding/attachment have yet to be examined in the context of bedtime routine research.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Early dental caries are common worldwide and affect lower socioeconomic status children more heavily.
“Early dental caries are highly prevalent worldwide, and disproportionately impact lower SES children.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Most caregivers are present at bedtime and can engage interactively with their children.
“Bedtime is a time when most caregivers are present and can engage interactively with their children.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cuddling and rocking during early childhood involves some skin-to-skin contact.
“cuddling and rocking during early childhood likely involves some SSC.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is a dose-dependent relationship between bedtime routine and outcomes.
“to elicit the dose-dependent bedtime routine-outcome response relationship.”
Citations
Cites
Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect
Victora, C. G., Bahl, R., Barros, A. J. D., França, G. V. A., Horton, S., Krasevec, J., Murch, S., Sankar, M. J., Walker, N., & Rollins, N. C. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01024-7 · Cited by 8,040
Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk
Breastfeeding, S. O. (2005) · PEDIATRICS · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2491 · Cited by 5,357
Breastfeeding and the use of human milk
BREASTFEEDING, S. O., Eidelman, A. I., Schanler, R. J., Johnston, M., Landers, S., Noble, L., Szucs, K., & Viehmann, L. (2012) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2011-3552 · Cited by 4,357
Langenberg, D. N. (2000) · Cited by 4,305
Skill formation and the economics of investing in disadvantaged children
Heckman, J. J. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1128898 · Cited by 3,559
Bronfenbrenner, U. (2000) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1037/10518-046 · Cited by 3,197
Early childhood development coming of age: science through the life course
Black, M. M., Walker, S. P., Fernald, L. C. H., Andersen, C. T., DiGirolamo, A. M., Lu, C., McCoy, D. C., Fink, G., Shawar, Y. R., Shiffman, J., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31389-7 · Cited by 3,014
The environment of childhood poverty
Evans, G. W. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.2.77 · Cited by 2,396
Bus, A. G., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Pellegrini, A. D. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065001001 · Cited by 2,063
Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants
Moore, E. R., Bergman, N., Anderson, G. C., & Medley, N. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003519.pub4 · Cited by 1,930
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Fiese, 2002, Routines of daily living and rituals in family life: a glimpse at stability and change during the early child-raising years, Zero Three, 22, 10
- Maclean, 1987, Rhymes, nursery rhymes, and reading in early childhood, Merrill-Palmer Q (1982-), 255
- Catterall, 2008, Unpacking the impact of music on intelligence, Neurosci Music Pedagogy, 171
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rhodes, R. E., Guerrero, M., Vanderloo, L. M., Barbeau, K., Birken, C. S., Chaput, J., Faulkner, G., Janssen, I., Madigan, S. L., Mâsse, L. C., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-020-00973-0 · Cited by 377
Pediatric sleep health: It matters, and so does how we define it
Meltzer, L. J., Williamson, A. A., & Mindell, J. A. A. (2021) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101425 · Cited by 374
Self-citationA predictable home environment may protect child mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic
Glynn, L. M., Davis, E. P., Luby, J. L., Baram, T. Z., & Sandman, C. A. (2021) · Neurobiology of Stress · doi:10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100291 · Cited by 203
“…child mental health, and these include parental mental health, parenting efficacy, behavior monitoring, family cohesion and child sleep, each of which are likely to be bolstered by family routines (Fiese et al., 2002; Mindell and Williamson, 2018; Porter and Hsu, 2003; Chang and Qin, 2018).”
Promoting Mental Health and Wellness in Youth Through Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Sleep
Hosker, D. K., Elkins, R. M., & Potter, M. P. (2019) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.chc.2018.11.010 · Cited by 244
Sleep and Early Brain Development
Jiang, F. (2019) · Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism · doi:10.1159/000508055 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Mindell, J. A., & Williamson, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mindell, Jodi A.
- Venue
- Sleep medicine reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-08
- Volume
- 40
- Pages
- 93-108
- ISSN
- 1087-0792 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6587181
- OpenAlex
- W2767478263
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 164
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Sleep Medicine Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Health and Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Keywords
- bedtime routines, early childhood development, children's sleep, nurturing care, language development, literacy, parent-child attachment, family functioning, vulnerable children, socioeconomic deprivation, bedtime reading, lullabies, physical contact, hygiene practices
- MeSH terms
- Sleep Hygiene, Child Development, Child Welfare, Child, Preschool, Habits, Humans, Parent-Child Relations, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review