Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review

Open access
Dedehayir, Ozgur, Mäkinen, Saku J., Roland Ortt, J.·2018·Technological Forecasting and Social Change
DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This paper addresses recent calls to enhance our understanding of innovation ecosystem genesis, focusing in particular on the roles that come to prominence during this important yet volatile phase in the innovation ecosystem lifecycle. To this end, we undertook a systematic review of the literature, which has allowed us to study in detail 60 publications appearing in journals and conference proceedings. Our results propose several roles seminal to innovation ecosystem birth, which we have collated thematically into four groups – leadership roles (‘ecosystem leader’ and ‘dominator’), direct value creation roles (‘supplier’, ‘assembler’, ‘complementor’, and ‘user’), value creation support roles (‘expert’ and ‘champion’), and entrepreneurial ecosystem roles (‘entrepreneur’, ‘sponsor’, and ‘regulator’) – and defined in terms of the specific activities they carry out during ecosystem birth. Furthermore, our findings tentatively suggest the entrance of these roles at different times as the process of genesis unfolds. Particular roles, such as the champion, are likely to be pivotal in ensuring that the innovation can move successfully from discovery to its commercialization. We conclude our paper by discussing future research avenues that can build on our role typology, to shed further light on the process of innovation ecosystem genesis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Adner, 2007, Managing transitions in the semiconductor lithography ecosystem, Solid State Technol., 20
  2. Kapoor, 2007, Technology interdependence and the evolution of semiconductor lithography, Solid State Technol., 51
  3. Popp, 2010, Goals of software vendors for partner ecosystems - A practitioner's view, Softw. Bus., 51, 181, 10.1007/978-3-642-13633-7_17 · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13633-7_17
  4. Roberts, 1981, Staffing the innovative technology-based organization, Sloan Manag. Rev., 22, 19
  5. Tighe, 1998, From experience: Securing sponsors and funding for new product development projects – the human side enterprise, J. Prod. Innov. Manag., 15, 75, 10.1111/1540-5885.1510075 · doi:10.1111/1540-5885.1510075

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S. J., & Roland Ortt, J.
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
136
Pages
18-29
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028
OpenAlex
W2559764717
Cited by
499
References
82
FWCI
23.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)
Funders
Academy of Finland (279087)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.