Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 560

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 95 of the 95 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis

Open access
Gaviria-Marin, Magaly, Merigó, José M., Baier-Fuentes, Hugo·2019·Technological Forecasting and Social Change
DOI 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract Knowledge management (KM) is a field of research that has gained wide acceptance in the scientific community and management literature. This article presents a bibliometric overview of the academic research on KM in the business and management areas. Various bibliometric methods are used to perform this overview, including performance analysis and science mapping of the KM field. The performance analysis uses a series of bibliometric indicators, such as the h-index, productivity and citations. In addition, the VOSviewer software is used to map the bibliographic material. Science mapping uses co-citations and the concurrency of keywords. References were obtained from the Web of Science database. We identified and classified the most relevant research in the field according to journals, articles, authors, institutions and countries. The results show that research in this field has increased significantly in the last ten years and that the USA is the most influential country in all aspects in this field. It is important to consider, however, that science continues to advance in this and in all fields and that data rapidly change over time. Therefore, this paper fulfills an informational role that shows that most of the fundamental research of KM is in business and management areas.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006

Cites

95 of 95 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Harman, 2005, Frequency of publication and topical emphasis of knowledge management books versus doctoral dissertations: 1983–2005, J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 46
  2. Lambe, 2011, The unacknowledged parentage of knowledge management, J. Knowl. Manag., 15, 175, 10.1108/13673271111119646 · doi:10.1108/13673271111119646
  3. Park, 2006, Knowledge management system for fourth generation R&D: KNOWVATION, Technovation, 26, 595, 10.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.008 · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.10.008
  4. Staples, 2001, Opportunities for research about managing the knowledge-based enterprise, Int. J. Manag. Rev., 3, 1, 10.1111/1468-2370.00051 · doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00051

Cited by

See all 560

Metadata

Authors
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H.
Venue
Technological Forecasting and Social Change
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
140
Pages
194-220
ISSN
0040-1625 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006
OpenAlex
W2886191303
Cited by
560
References
95
FWCI
24.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.