Cited by 791Technostress in Professional SettingsTechnology Adoption and User BehaviourInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Technostress: negative effect on performance and possible mitigations

Open access
Tarafdar, Monideepa, Pullins, Ellen Bolman., Ragu‐Nathan, T. S.·2015·Information Systems Journal

Abstract

We investigate the effect of conditions that create technostress, on technology‐enabled innovation, technology‐enabled performance and overall performance. We further look at the role of technology self‐efficacy, organizational mechanisms that inhibit technostress and technology competence as possible mitigations to the effects of technostress creators. Our findings show a negative association between technostress creators and performance. We find that, while traditional effort‐based mechanisms such as building technology competence reduce the impact of technostress creators on technology‐enabled innovation and performance, more empowering mechanisms such as developing technology self‐efficacy and information systems (IS) literacy enhancement and involvement in IS initiatives are required to counter the decrease in overall performance because of technostress creators. Noting that the professional sales context offers increasingly high expectations for technology‐enabled performance in an inherently interpersonal‐oriented and relationship‐oriented environment with regard to overall performance, and high failure rates for IS acceptance/use, the study uses survey data collected from 237 institutional sales professionals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/isj.12042

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings extend existing classifications of technostress-antecedents and technostress-inhibitors by the influence of leadership.

    “These findings contribute to technostress research by extending existing classifications of technostress-antecedents and technostressinhibitors (La Torre et al. 2019;Ragu-Nathan et al. 2008;Tarafdar et al. 2015) by the influence of leadership.”

    From Leadership and technostress: A systematic literature review (2025) · cites this paper as Tarafdar et al. 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Behrman, D. and Perreault, W. (1984) A Role Stress Model of the Performance and Satisfaction of Industrial Salespersons, Journal of Marketing 48(4): 9-21.
  2. Bharadwaj, S. and Menon, A. (2000) Making Innovation Happen in Organizations: Individual Creativity Mechanisms, Organizational Creativity Mechanisms or Both?, Journal of Product Innovation Management 17:424-434.
  3. Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M. (1985) Self-Determination: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..
  4. Eggert, A. and Serdaroglu, M. (2011) Exploring the Impact of Sales Technology on Salesperson Performance: A Task-Based Approach, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 19(2): 169- 186.
  5. Fu, F., Richards, K., Hughes, D. and Jones, E. (2010) Motivating Salespeople to Sell New Products: The Relative Influence of Attitudes, Subjective Norms, and Self-Efficacy, Journal of Marketing 74(6): 61-76.
  6. Holt, S. (1998) Sales Force Automation Ramps Up, InfoWorld 20(29): 38.
  7. Hunter, G. and Perrault, W. (2006) Sales Technology Orientation, Information Effectiveness and Sales Performance, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 26(2): 95-113.
  8. Im, S. and Workman Jr, J. (2004) Market Orientation, Creativity, and New Product Performance in High-Technology Firms, Journal of Marketing 68: 114-132.
  9. Jimmieson, N. and Terry, D. (1998) The role of informational control in the stress strain relationship; 13th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology.
  10. Kumar, R. and Uzkurt, C. (2010) Investigating the effects of self-efficacy on innovativeness and the moderating impact of cultural dimensions, Journal of International Business & Cultural Studies 4: 1-15.
  11. Lazarus, R. (1991) Psychological stress in the workplace, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 6: 1-13.
  12. Nelson, D. (1990) Individual adjustment to information-driven technologies: a critical review, MIS Quarterly: 79-98.
  13. Nelson, D.L. and Kletke, M.G. (1990) Individual adjustment during technology innovation: A research framework, Behavior and Information Technology 9(4): 257-271.
  14. Nunnally, J. (1978) Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  15. Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing, International Journal of Research in Marketing 19(4): 305-335.
  16. Sainfort, P. (1990) Job design predicators of stress in automated office, Behavior and Information Technology 9(1): 3-16.
  17. Saxe, R. and Weitz, B. (1982) The SOCO Scale: A Measure of the Customer Orientation of Salespeople, Journal of Marketing Research 19(3): 343-351.
  18. Tanner, J.F., Ahearne, M., Leigh, T.W., Mason, C. and Moncrief, W. (2005) CRM in sales- intensive organizations: A review and future directions, Journal of Personal Selling and Sales Management 25(2): 170-180.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu‐Nathan, T. S.
Affiliations
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • University of Toledo (US)
Corresponding author
Tarafdar, Monideepa
Venue
Information Systems Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-24
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
103-132
ISSN
  • 1350-1917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2575
OpenAlex
W2164949797
Cited by
791
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 154 · 2025: 119 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 110 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 59 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
20.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Information Systems Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Technostress in Professional Settings
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
technostress, technology self-efficacy, technological competence, overall performance, salespeople, mitigating circumstances, organizational mechanisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review