CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 305

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Letting structure emerge: connectionist and dynamical systems approaches to cognition

McClelland, James L., Botvinick, Matthew M., Noelle, David C., Plaut, David C., Rogers, Timothy T., Seidenberg, Mark S., Smith, Linda B.·2010·Trends in Cognitive Sciences
DOI 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.002

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Sternberg, D. and McClelland, J.L. (2009) When should we expect indirect effects in human contingency learning? In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (Taatgen, N.A. and van Rijn, H., eds), pp. 206-211, Cognitive Science Society
  2. Movellan, 1993, Learning continuous probability distributions with symmetric diffusion networks, Cogn. Sci., 17, 463, 10.1207/s15516709cog1704_1 · DOI
  3. Hinton, 2006, Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks, Science, 313, 504, 10.1126/science.1127647 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Perfors, A. et al. (2006) Poverty of the stimulus? A rational approach. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 663–668, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  5. Sobel, 2004, Children's causal inferences from indirect evidence: backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers, Cogn. Sci., 28, 303
  6. Baillargeon, 1994, How do infants learn about the physical world?, Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci., 3, 133, 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770614 · DOI
  7. Thelen, 2001, The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perseverative reaching, Behav. Brain Sci., 24, 1, 10.1017/S0140525X01003910 · DOI
  8. Clearfield, 2009, Cue salience and infant perseverative reaching: Tests of the dynamic field theory, Dev. Sci., 12, 26, 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00769.x · DOI
  9. Clearfield, 2006, Young infants reach correctly in A-not-B tasks: On the development of stability and perseveration, Infant Behav. Dev., 29, 435, 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.03.001 · DOI
  10. Spencer, 2001, Tests of a dynamic systems account of the A-not-B error: The influence of prior experience on the spatial memory abilities of two-year-olds, Child Dev., 72, 1327, 10.1111/1467-8624.00351 · DOI
  11. Diedrich, 2000, Motor memory is a factor in infant perseverative errors, Dev. Sci., 3, 479, 10.1111/1467-7687.00140 · DOI
  12. Lew, 2007, Postural change effects on infants’ AB task performance: Visual, postural, or spatial?, J. Exp. Child Psychol., 97, 1, 10.1016/j.jecp.2006.12.009 · DOI
  13. Elman, 1990, Finding structure in time, Cogn. Sci., 14, 179, 10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Rohde, 1999, Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: How important is starting small?, Cognition, 72, 67, 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00031-1 · DOI
  15. Keil, 1981, Constraints on knowledge and cognitive development, Psychol. Rev., 88, 197, 10.1037/0033-295X.88.3.197 · DOI
  16. Gelman, 1990, First principles organize attention to and learning about relevant data: Number and the animate/inanimate distinction as examples, Cogn. Sci., 14, 79, 10.1207/s15516709cog1401_5 · DOI
  17. Colunga, 2005, From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: a role for associative learning, Psychol. Rev., 112, 347, 10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.347 · DOI
  18. Gelman, 1986, Categories and induction in young children, Cognition, 23, 183, 10.1016/0010-0277(86)90034-X · DOI
  19. Rogers, 2004, The structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation, Psychol. Rev., 111, 205, 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.205 · DOI · Paper page
  20. McClelland, J.L. et al. (2009) Semantic cognition: Its nature, its development, and its neural basis. In The cognitive neurosciences IV (Gazzaniga, M., ed.), pp. 1047–1066, MIT Press · DOI
  21. Rogers, 2008, A simple model from a powerful framework that spans levels of analysis, Behav. Brain Sci., 31, 729, 10.1017/S0140525X08006067 · DOI
  22. McClelland, 1998, Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effeccts of experience in recognition memory, Psychol. Rev., 105, 724, 10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.734-760 · DOI
  23. Ratcliff, 1990, Connectionist models of recognition memory: Constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions, Psychol. Rev., 97, 285, 10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.285 · DOI
  24. Feldman, 2009, The influence of categories on perception: Explaining the perceptual magnet effect as optimal statistical inference, Psychol. Rev., 116, 752, 10.1037/a0017196 · DOI
  25. Hay, 2001, Lexical frequency in morphology: Is everything relative?, Linguistics, 39, 1041, 10.1515/ling.2001.041 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Bybee, 2005, Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on domain general principles of human cognition, Ling. Rev., 22, 381, 10.1515/tlir.2005.22.2-4.381 · DOI
  27. Gonnerman, 2007, A distributed connectionist approach to morphology: Evidence from graded semantic and phonological effects in lexical priming, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 136, 323, 10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.323 · DOI
  28. Smolensky, P. and Legendre, G. (2006) The harmonic mind: From neural computation to Optimality-theoretic grammar, Vol. 1: Cognitive architecture, Vol. 2: Linguistic and philosophical Implications, MIT Press
  29. Rumelhart, D.E. et al. (1986) Schemata and sequential thought processes in PDP models. In Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2) (McClelland, J.L. et al., eds), pp. 7-57, MIT Press
  30. Plaut, 1996, Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains, Psychol. Rev., 103, 56, 10.1037/0033-295X.103.1.56 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Plaut, 2000, Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing?, Lang. Cogn. Proc., 15, 445, 10.1080/01690960050119661 · DOI
  32. Pinker, 2002, The past and future of the past tense, Trends Cogn. Sci., 6, 456, 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01990-3 · DOI
  33. Rumelhart, D.E. and McClelland, J.L. (1986) On learning past tenses of English verbs. In Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 2) (McClelland, J.L. et al., eds), pp. 216–271, MIT press
  34. Joanisse, 1999, Impairments in verb morphology following brain injury: a connectionist model, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 96, 7592, 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7592 · DOI
  35. Seidenberg, 1989, A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming, Psychol. Rev., 96, 523, 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Servan-Schreiber, 1991, Graded state machines: The representation of temporal contingencies in simple recurrent networks, Mach. Learn., 7, 161, 10.1007/BF00114843 · DOI
  37. St. John, 1992, The story gestalt: A model of knowledge-intensive processes in text comprehension, Cogn. Sci., 16, 271, 10.1207/s15516709cog1602_5 · DOI
  38. Jansen, 2001, Evidence for the phase transition from Rule I to Rule II on the balance scale task, Dev. Rev., 21, 450, 10.1006/drev.2001.0530 · DOI
  39. Ferretti, 1986, Are childrens’ rule-assessment classifications invariant across instances of problem types?, Child Dev., 57, 1419, 10.2307/1130420 · DOI
  40. Schapiro, 2009, A connectionist model of a continuous developmental transition in the balance scale task, Cognition, 110, 395, 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.017 · DOI
  41. Farah, 1991, A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality-specificity and emergent category-specificity, J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 120, 339, 10.1037/0096-3445.120.4.339 · DOI
  42. Schwartz, 1991, The quantitative description of action disorganization after brain damage: A case study, Cogn. Neuropsychol., 8, 381, 10.1080/02643299108253379 · DOI
  43. Botvinick, 2004, Doing without schema hierarchies: A recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action, Psychol. Rev., 111, 395, 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.395 · DOI
  44. Botvinick, 2006, Short-term memory for serial order: A recurrent neural network model, Psychol. Rev., 113, 201, 10.1037/0033-295X.113.2.201 · DOI
  45. Hirsh-Pasek, K. et al. (2000) An emergentist coalition model for word learning: mapping words to objects is a product of the interaction of multiple cues. In Becoming a Word Learner: a Debate on Lexical Acquisition (Hirsh-Pasek, K. and Golinkoff, R.M., eds), pp. 136-164, Oxford Press · DOI
  46. Mayor, 2010, A neurocomputational account of taxonomic responding and fast mapping in early word learning, Psychol. Rev., 117, 1, 10.1037/a0018130 · DOI
  47. McClelland, 2002, Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out?, Trends Cogn. Sci., 6, 465, 10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01993-9 · DOI
  48. Marchman, 1994, Continuity in lexical and morphological development: A test of the critical mass hypothesis, J. Child Lang., 21, 339, 10.1017/S0305000900009302 · DOI
  49. MacWhinney, 1998, Models of the emergence of language, Ann. Rev. Psychol., 49, 199, 10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.199 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McClelland, J. L., Botvinick, M. M., Noelle, D. C., Plaut, D. C., Rogers, T. T., Seidenberg, M. S., & Smith, L. B.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
14
Issue
8
Pages
348-356
ISSN
1364-6613
DOI
10.1016/j.tics.2010.06.002
Cited by
305
References
8
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review