Cited by 106Bayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceMemory and Neural MechanismsNeural dynamics and brain function

Toward the neural implementation of structure learning

Tervo, D Gowanlock R, Tenenbaum, Joshua B, Gershman, Samuel J·2016·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Despite significant advances in neuroscience, the neural bases of intelligence remain poorly understood. Arguably the most elusive aspect of intelligence is the ability to make robust inferences that go far beyond one's experience. Animals categorize objects, learn to vocalize and may even estimate causal relationships - all in the face of data that is often ambiguous and sparse. Such inductive leaps are thought to result from the brain's ability to infer latent structure that governs the environment. However, we know little about the neural computations that underlie this ability. Recent advances in developing computational frameworks that can support efficient structure learning and inductive inference may provide insight into the underlying component processes and help pave the path for uncovering their neural implementation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.conb.2016.01.014

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relating Bayesian inference and learning, especially structure learning in nonparametric models, to its implementation in the brain remains challenging.

    “However, relating Bayesian inference and learning, especially structure learning in nonparametric models, to its implementation in the brain remains challenging107.”

    From Cognitive computational neuroscience (2018) · cites this paper as [107]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tervo, D. G. R., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Tervo, D Gowanlock R
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
37
Pages
99-105
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2286353276
Cited by
106
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
structure learning, inductive reasoning, computational models of learning, data sparsity, causal inference, object classification, vocal learning, neural computation
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Learning, Models, Neurological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review