Cited by 383Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorCognitive Science and Education Research

Mood as representation of momentum

Open access
Eldar, Eran, Rutledge, Robb B., Dolan, Raymond J., Niv, Yael·2016·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Experiences affect mood, which in turn affects subsequent experiences. Recent studies suggest two specific principles. First, mood depends on how recent reward outcomes differ from expectations. Second, mood biases the way we perceive outcomes (e.g., rewards), and this bias affects learning about those outcomes. We propose that this two-way interaction serves to mitigate inefficiencies in the application of reinforcement learning to real-world problems. Specifically, we propose that mood represents the overall momentum of recent outcomes, and its biasing influence on the perception of outcomes 'corrects' learning to account for environmental dependencies. We describe potential dysfunctions of this adaptive mechanism that might contribute to the symptoms of mood disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.010

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eldar, E., Rutledge, R. B., Dolan, R. J., & Niv, Y.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
  • Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Eldar, Eran
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
15-24
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2194932295
Cited by
383
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 5
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Army Research Office (W911NF-14-1-0101)
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Wellcome Trust (095844/Z/11/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Cognitive Science and Education Research
Keywords
mood, momentum, reinforcement learning, reward anticipation, learning bias, environmental dependency, mood disorders
MeSH terms
Affect, Humans, Learning, Reinforcement, Psychology, Reward

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review